Posted on 12/19/2005 1:53:38 PM PST by Cinnamon
Not trollish.
See I support reason over emotion, knowledge over belief.
Sometimes that conflicts with what people want to believe.
Your rudeness aside...
I have yet to see anyone support the notion that you can wiretap U.S. citizens without a court order and not be in violation of both the law and the constitution.
Proving a negative is impossible when it comes to conduct, but when it comes to arguing that there is "no written Iraqi law," all you have to do is ... drum roll please .... read the Iraqi law books.
Then may I suggest a remedial reading course. Because you lack reading comprehension. You've been given cites and continue to hold on to YOUR mistaken BELIEF.
I guess I came late to the party. :) Sounds like an interesting afternoon.
You're going to be drum-rolliing for a long time. You want me to post the entire Iraqi civil code here?
Since 2005-12-03
"I have yet to see anyone support the notion that you can wiretap U.S. citizens without a court order and not be in violation of both the law and the constitution."
You prove that there are none so blind as those who refuse to see.
Go read FISA. The links are provided.
FISA has been upheld as constiutional, as have other, earlier, acts that gave much less protection.
Yes I know the horror, that I would hold on to my belief...which is anchored in the law and the Constitution, not in "Well I think the President ought to be able to do it, so he should!"
Yes. We have an illiterate troll. Poor thing can't read.
You have been cited law and fact in several posts and continue to blithely ignore it.
You are continuing along in mistaken belief rather than basing off FACT.
Got zot?
Thanks for posting... good stuff...
Why not post a link. I'm quite sure there will be several people who will actually take the time to read through it.
You seem to just be unable to get it.
NO WHERE in FISA does it allow the President to allow a warantless wiretap on a citizen of the United States. No where. No one has posted any information to the contrary.
"that I would hold on to my belief"
Contrary to law..
"which is anchored in the law and the Constitution, "
A lack of understanding of the laws cited to you, willful twisting and ignoring of said laws..
"not in "Well I think the President ought to be able to do it, so he should!""
And ignoring HISTORY and fact.
No, YOU are unable to get it.
YOU claimed that no prior politician wiretapped anyone.
Fact and history don't back you up.
And yes, you ARE a troll.
*shakes head* Such a shame. ;)
Your problem is that you haven't READ the law. It was given to you. I read just recently that literacy IS a problem for some. Go back to DU or wherever you crawled out of because your feints won't work here.
zot....dolt!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.