Dream on...
Posted on 12/16/2005 7:23:26 AM PST by Wolfie
Improperly? Beg that question!
Sorry, I don't speak hempish.
Nope, you're muttering to yourself.
"If I smoke marijuana, I may not be led to rob a store. But I can lose my job and then be motivated to steal," John Fielder, a clinical psychologist... told the Senate committee last session.
It's the little things that expose a person. Note that Fielder said "I", rather than If a person...
"If I a person smokes marijuana, I the person may not be led to rob a store. But I the person can lose my his job and then be motivated to steal,"
If he, John Fielder, is capable of acting irresponsibly, he assumes that any person could be as irresponsible as he sees himself. True, virtually any person could be as irresponsible, yet it is Fielder that exposes himself. Apparently without pot prohibition he wouldn't know how to act responsibly.
Obviously his response to this would be something along the lines of: "Oh, but I wasn't speaking about myself, it is other people that could act irresponsibly."
My response: so that's why you spoke in the first person, because you were speaking about other people. Depends on the meaning of is, right?
You're beyond hope ... I'm talking over your head to the grownups.
Mojave, aka Roscoe, has for years been posting his one-line non sequiturs and straw men on the WOD threads. Mojave/Roscoe is a staunch WOsomeD warrior whom at one time actually made coherent arguments. Albeit they were all refuted causing, by his own choice, to digress to what you read of him today.
His posts do keep the threads bumped to the top where his trivial remarks are easily ignored and the only recognized value of them is as representative of the overall pitiful arguments put forth in support of the WOsomeD.
For example, from the article: "If I smoke marijuana, I may not be led to rob a store. But I can lose my job and then be motivated to steal," John Fielder, a clinical psychologist... told the Senate committee last session. How pitiful is that!?
Dream on...
I believe that what you describe is an acquired characteristic normally developed in an institutional setting, such as a public school.
Thinking in slogans results in chronic cognitive dissonance.
We are up to our a$$es in METH and Murkowski is going to try, again, to move against pot?
Murkowski, both of them, will be GONE before we Alaskans put up with more of their cr@p.
I liked him when he was in D.C., but he has been an offensive arrogant failure as governor, he really pi$$ed us off by putting his daughter into his vacant seat.
She was given a chance by us, but she's showing her true colors now, with McCain for the so-called torture "ban', now this with the Patriot act?
Do your worst Murkowskis, you're both out of here.
Can you BOTH say "one term'?
I knew you could.
Where does the state constitution set out a 4 ounce pot exemption to state law. I'll bet you're blowing smoke; that you don't know or care what the state constitution actually says. That you're another cheerleader for leftist judges legislating from the bench, inventing law as they go.
Produce the quote, prove me wrong.
Its explicit protection of privacy protects possession of every finite amount ... but allowing four ounces still brings Alaska closer to the truth than allowing none.
"There you go again", but...
I'm an ALASKAN, and YOU, are NOT, I vote in every ALASKAN election, you CAN'T.
OUR courts have settled on whatever they have settled on re: POT, according to OUR, (ALASKANS), RIGHT of PRIVACY that is in our CONSTITUTION.
Your opinion, here (in ALASKA), means NOTHING.
Don't like it?
Too bad.
The same goes for Murkowski, (although, Murkowski, (unlike you), being an ALASKAN, he is free to TRY).
And you leftists cheer the abandonment of law in favor of judicial activism.
A barge full of dope? Soros salivates at the prospect.
Making laws through elected representatives in a state legislature? I never suggested that you support such republican values. It's clear that you don't.
You want legalized dope, sanctioned by leftwing judges making law from the bench, just like the rest of your leftist comrades.
Your forced laughter doesn't hide the Soros inside.
And Coors salivates at a barge full of beer barrels. What of it?
So you want a dope entitlement.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.