Skip to comments.
Hurricane Katrina Survivor Victimized Again: Injuries from Police Required Surgery
US Newswire (Press release) ^
| 12/14/05
| n/a
Posted on 12/15/2005 8:36:27 AM PST by kiriath_jearim
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: kiriath_jearim
The question at issue, which the article completely avoids, is whether or not she threatened police with the firearm they confiscated from her.
2
posted on
12/15/2005 8:38:36 AM PST
by
wideawake
To: kiriath_jearim
We'll sue you for NOT removing us, and we'll sue you FOR removing us..
(shakin head)..
3
posted on
12/15/2005 8:38:55 AM PST
by
GeorgiaDawg32
(Islam is a religion of peace and they'll behead 13 year old girls to prove it...)
To: kiriath_jearim
USCG rescued over 5,000 residents without anybody getting hurt.
To: wideawake
if it was avoided in the article, may I venture a guess??
5
posted on
12/15/2005 8:39:29 AM PST
by
GeorgiaDawg32
(Islam is a religion of peace and they'll behead 13 year old girls to prove it...)
To: kiriath_jearim
"When she refused to leave as ordered, they confiscated a firearm used for defense and according to Konie, "slammed" her to the ground, both displacing and fracturing her left shoulder."
This is a violation of several amendments of the Constitution. What were they trying to do? Looks as though they had a low IQ and need to be replaced.
6
posted on
12/15/2005 8:41:21 AM PST
by
YOUGOTIT
To: kiriath_jearim
Fact of American Life - after any natural disaster the lawyers will come out of the sewer to strip the bodies and get their cut of the recovery money.
Can anyone say 'tort reform'?
7
posted on
12/15/2005 8:41:31 AM PST
by
wvobiwan
(It's OUR Net! If you don't like it keep your stanky routers off it!)
To: kiriath_jearim
We saw that on television. The woman posed NO threat whatsoever to the officers.
It was pathetic to watch those guys manhandling this frail woman.
8
posted on
12/15/2005 8:41:35 AM PST
by
OldFriend
(The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
To: wideawake
I saw the incident on Fox news. The lady did not threaten the police. She told them she had a gun for protection and they took it from her. From what was shown on tv (Fox News), the police did go over the line on this one.
To: wideawake
The question at issue, which the article completely avoids, is whether or not she threatened police with the firearm they confiscated from her.
Are they still police when following an unlawful order, or are they merely thugs? The orther services didn't have a problem with this; but, in part that was because they refused to follow the Mayor's order to forcefully remove people without due process.
10
posted on
12/15/2005 8:45:48 AM PST
by
ARCADIA
(Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
To: wideawake
Some of us saw the video of this event. It didn't appear she was threatening anyone, at least on tape, BUT it also didn't seem that she needed to leave. Her house was high and dry, and she was doing just fine. Some of the police bullying that went on in these dry neighborhoods was unconscionable. Some of these, moreover, were wealthy neighborhoods, and police were later seen and caught with items from some of these houses. Not all the looting was done by "the poor."
Even worse was the confiscation of firearms, highly illegal. I believe that is being litigated by the NRA.
11
posted on
12/15/2005 8:49:55 AM PST
by
MizSterious
(Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
To: wvobiwan
You're way off base here. Maybe you should get the facts before you jerk your knee. The woman was no threat to anyone, and she was unlawfully forced from her home. She was safe there, except for the roaming thugs who wore badges.
12
posted on
12/15/2005 8:51:34 AM PST
by
MizSterious
(Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
To: kiriath_jearim
What's sad is, this the classic "blood from a turnip" situation. Even if she wins, I wonder if she'll ever see a penny of it.
13
posted on
12/15/2005 8:53:35 AM PST
by
MizSterious
(Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
To: Semper Paratus
My question is, "Why did they have to?".
People tend to forget that the residents of NOLA had a week's notice that a major hurricane was approaching, and that there were plenty of school buses (later photographed in a flooded lot) available for them to board and evacuate.
I have searched my heart, and cannot find one drop of sympathy for any of those 'rooftop' evacuees. I am totally fed up with 'victims' of stupidity. That includes the entire media who should be ashamed of the way they conducted themselves during this national hatefest.
To: GeorgiaDawg32
If you saw the video that was taken and shown on, I believe, CNN and other stations, she merely displayed the weapon to the police and did not threaten them with it in any way. They brutally assaulted her to take it from her even though she did not threaten them in any way. She should have a very good case.
To: MizSterious
The nannie state in action. They injured her worse than did the disaster and they did it for her own good. Just remember children in adult bodies: no one loves you more nor can protect you from your inferior self better than the greatest nannie of all. Vying for second place nannie -CEO's who will deny you an income for your health and improper thought.
16
posted on
12/15/2005 8:59:19 AM PST
by
Galveston Grl
(Getting angry and abandoning power to the Democrats is not a choice.)
To: GeorgiaDawg32
Damned if you do and damned if you don't. Next time let her drown.
17
posted on
12/15/2005 9:02:49 AM PST
by
CajunConservative
(Don't Blame Me, I Voted for Jindal.)
To: CajunConservative
Try looking for the facts before firing next time. She was in NO danger of drowning.
18
posted on
12/15/2005 9:04:22 AM PST
by
MizSterious
(Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
To: ishabibble
She was NOT a "rooftop" refugee. Not all neighborhoods were flooded (although to see most media reports, you might think they were), and hers was dry. There was no good reason for her to leave, except the thugs police ordered her to.
19
posted on
12/15/2005 9:06:36 AM PST
by
MizSterious
(Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
To: Galveston Grl
And amazingly, the nanny-state gets plenty of support here on Free Republic. See all the posts wondering how dare she not want to leave her house, even though it was safe, even though (before they confiscated her gun) she could protect herself, even though she had enough provisions.
20
posted on
12/15/2005 9:08:34 AM PST
by
MizSterious
(Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson