Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Myth of the electable moderate
World net Daily ^ | 12/12/05 | Vox Day

Posted on 12/14/2005 4:51:39 PM PST by NormsRevenge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
Vox Day is a novelist and Christian libertarian. He is a member of the SFWA, Mensa and the Southern Baptist church, and has been down with Madden since 1992.
1 posted on 12/14/2005 4:51:39 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The constant substitution of "electable" moderates for principled conservatives is what repeatedly kills the Republican Party and prevents it from ever realizing even a small part of its platform when it is in power.

Worth repeating.

2 posted on 12/14/2005 4:55:40 PM PST by Sister_T (Kenneth Blackwell for Governor of Ohio!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
If liberals propose a program and it's a just plain bad idea, the only logical thing to do is oppose it entirely. Even if refusal to "compromise" means the liberals ram through the program "full strength" instead of settling for a "watered down" version, it's still better to remain firm in stating that it's a bad idea.

When the program fails, someone who said it's a bad idea will be in a good position to explain so. By contrast, someone who worked to "water down" the program will not be in a position to do anything but shoulder blame.

3 posted on 12/14/2005 4:57:08 PM PST by supercat (Sony delinda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I've said it before and I'll repeat it agian, with emphasis:

What the hell was the CAGOP thinking when they sidled up to a foreign national with clearly defined liberal tendencies?

4 posted on 12/14/2005 5:18:40 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp; ElkGroveDan; Carry_Okie; tubebender; Czar; Prime Choice; FOG724; Reagan Man

Bump and Ping!

Another good article.


5 posted on 12/14/2005 5:28:58 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
What the hell was the CAGOP thinking when they sidled up to a foreign national with clearly defined liberal tendencies?


Well Arnie hasn't advanced the liberal agenda nearly as much as the so called conservatives in congress with their drug giveaways and farm pork not to mention creating a massive new department . Will some FReeper please explain to me why pretend conservative politicians like Delay and inc who consistently pass radically liberal bills that gouge Taxpayers are spared the vitriol directed at Arnie ?
6 posted on 12/14/2005 5:31:27 PM PST by newfarm4000n (God Bless America and God Bless Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: supercat
If liberals propose a program and it's a just plain bad idea, the only logical thing to do is oppose it entirely.

Unfortunately, in California we have a confused bunch in the GOP. In 2003, Gray Davis proposed borrowing $8 billion to address a cash shortfall for operating expenses. Republicans strongly opposed it and took him to court to stop him.

Fast forward... Davis recalled.... Schwarzenegger elected. Schwarzenegger replaces Davis' borrowing scheme with one of his own--borrowing $15 billion for operating expenses. He initiated it, promoted it, and got the CA GOP to endorse it.

It seems that even liberal ideas are embraced by this party, as long as they have an (R) next to them.

7 posted on 12/14/2005 5:44:21 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I can't believe there were people advocating a Constitutional Amendment so the The Arnold could run for President...
8 posted on 12/14/2005 5:44:57 PM PST by tubebender (You can't make Chicken Salad from Chicken Bleep...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newfarm4000n
Will some FReeper please explain to me why pretend conservative politicians like Delay and inc who consistently pass radically liberal bills that gouge Taxpayers are spared the vitriol directed at Arnie ?

I will.

The criticism of Governor Schwarzenegger is limited to the California Topic. Were I a resident of Texas, Representative Delay would probably receive, on the Texas Topic, equal criticism for acts of political larder or liberalism.

9 posted on 12/14/2005 5:45:02 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
I guess we don't gave any nationwide leaders of the caliber of say Margaret Thatcher or some other principled but electable conservative.
10 posted on 12/14/2005 5:51:51 PM PST by newfarm4000n (God Bless America and God Bless Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: newfarm4000n
Myth of the electable moderate.

Well, George W. got elected!

11 posted on 12/14/2005 5:54:16 PM PST by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tubebender

Governor S got many votes including from conservatives such as myself simply because the Dem candidate was so much worse, we didn't want to vote the better man in an election where many, many candidates were on the ballot include S and McC at the same time.

Why S? Because McC had little money for his campaign and was trailing badly in polls by election day.

Might have been different if the election had had a primary and then a final election where one dem vs one repub was on the ballot.

Normally, we like to vote the better Repub for the primary election and then whatever Repub was running vs the Dem/Socialist (same thing here in Calif) candidate.

But no primaries were done. Primaries would have helped McC a lot.


12 posted on 12/14/2005 6:13:17 PM PST by OldArmy52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The idea behind the Schwarzenegger gubernatorial candidacy was that his popularity and sheer manly presence would cause the Democrat-controlled legislature to genuflect in humble awe before him, thus allowing the state Republicans to return California to some semblance of fiscal and operational sanity.

BZZZZZZT!!! Wrongo! That was the pitch, not the idea. The folks who prepped, financed, and ran Arnold were looking to make sure the grubbamint gravy train they'd enjoyed under Bray Davis didn't get derailed by the recall.

When are these "experts" going to get it?

13 posted on 12/14/2005 6:18:28 PM PST by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are REALLY stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldArmy52
Why S? Because McC had little money for his campaign and was trailing badly in polls by election day.

Not really. Arnold and Tom were very close in the polls until the final week. If everyone who said I like him better but he can't win, had voted for him. He would have won.

14 posted on 12/14/2005 6:21:25 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The backup plan, in the event that the state Democratic leadership proved more recalcitrant than expected, was that the Great Man would simply bypass the Assembly and Senate and go over their heads in an appeal to the people of California.

That was everybody's backup plan, including McClintock's. Unfortunately, this clown thinks fiscal sanity was Arnold's goal when in reality it was delivering the goods.

So, Arnold borrowed a bucketful, and his Wall Street backers got the bond auction they'd paid for, wasting a TOTALLY unnecessary cool-half billion in extra fees, lost in-state taxable revenue, and taxes on in-State economic activity resulting from an in-State auction.

What a guy.

15 posted on 12/14/2005 6:24:26 PM PST by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are REALLY stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
If everyone who said I like him better but he can't win, had voted for him. He would have won.

How come nobody ever publishes that internal polling data? Its lack leaves us having to post parallel election results and leaving readers to infer the point.

It's been a pain.

16 posted on 12/14/2005 6:26:20 PM PST by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are REALLY stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Does anyone still rely on Hugh Hewitt? After all, he predicted that Oklahoma would win last year's college football national championship, and that both Notre Dame and UCLA would beat USC this year.


17 posted on 12/14/2005 6:26:29 PM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldArmy52
I have been registered as a California Republican since 1954...
18 posted on 12/14/2005 6:41:56 PM PST by tubebender (You can't make Chicken Salad from Chicken Bleep...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: newfarm4000n

Mike Pence 08!


19 posted on 12/14/2005 6:53:36 PM PST by JSDude1 (If we are not governed by God, we WILL be governed by Tyrants-William Penn..founder of Pennsylvania)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

On another topic your (CA's) newly elected John Campbell (R-CA) looks to be another solid big (C) in the House of Reps. Just look him up on townhall.com (I did) He's NOT a RINO at ALL!


20 posted on 12/14/2005 6:55:06 PM PST by JSDude1 (If we are not governed by God, we WILL be governed by Tyrants-William Penn..founder of Pennsylvania)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson