Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Steyn: Enough eco-neurosis already
The Spectator (U.K.) ^ | 12/10/05 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 12/08/2005 6:24:53 AM PST by Pokey78

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 12/08/2005 6:24:54 AM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Howlin; riley1992; Miss Marple; deport; Dane; sinkspur; steve; kattracks; JohnHuang2; ...

Steyn ping!


2 posted on 12/08/2005 6:26:17 AM PST by Pokey78 (‘FREE [INSERT YOUR FETID TOTALITARIAN BASKET-CASE HERE]’)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

Posted here
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1534586/posts


3 posted on 12/08/2005 6:29:36 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam; Carry_Okie; Chanticleer; ClearCase_guy; cogitator; CollegeRepublican; ...
ECO-PING

FReepmail me to be added or removed to the ECO-PING list!

Gotta love Stein!

4 posted on 12/08/2005 6:34:43 AM PST by GreenFreeper (Not blind opposition to progress, but opposition to blind progress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

I love it....as I sit here shivering in -17 record breaking cold, even for Wyoming. Still the idiots are yapping about global warming.
I really love their claims of global warming causing an ice age, do they ever listen to themselves or are they so mesmerized by the sound of their voices that they just make noise?
Thanks for this post.


5 posted on 12/08/2005 6:51:02 AM PST by midwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

It's 7 degrees in my part of Montana this morning: it was -10 degrees yesterday. Must be that global warming.


6 posted on 12/08/2005 6:53:04 AM PST by claudiustg (Go Bush! Go Sharon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: midwyf
Heck, it's even chilly down on the Mississippi Gulf Coast - we've had several lows below freezing and expect more in the coming week - not the usual fare down here where it generally waits until January to bust the freezing mark, and then only occasionally.
7 posted on 12/08/2005 7:03:29 AM PST by trebb ("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: midwyf

Wyomimg is a big place. Where? Close to the WY border, in Rapid City, I have a very unique situation, it is 41 degrees on the east side of the house where the sun is shining on the thermometer. The temperature readout on the Ford Explorer parked in the shade on the west side of the house reads -9F. Global warming in just 50 feet, or if your walking in the opposite direction, I suppose it would be global cooling.


8 posted on 12/08/2005 7:33:00 AM PST by wita (truthspeaks@freerepublic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

Nice post! Many great points there, especially on how rapidly the US is cleaning up its act without being involved in Kyoto.

Everyone should also remember that science and technology are advancing at a breakneck pace. What seems an insurmountable problem now may be tractable in 10 years, and trivial in 20. Spending billions or trillions of dollars on this now is not the smartest approach IMO. Especially since the actual science is far from well understood yet - what we need right now is a whole lot of data gathering and research.

Jerry Pournelle wrote many years ago that perhaps manmade "global warming" was actually saving us from an upcoming Ice Age. How ironic if that were true...


9 posted on 12/08/2005 7:37:04 AM PST by PreciousLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wita

That is amazing - a 50-degree difference on one house! I think I'd almost have to get video of that - one long take, so no one can accuse you of creative editing.


10 posted on 12/08/2005 7:37:26 AM PST by Xenalyte (Tom Cruise is in my closet and he won't come out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty
Everyone should also remember that science and technology are advancing at a breakneck pace. What seems an insurmountable problem now may be tractable in 10 years, and trivial in 20. Spending billions or trillions of dollars on this now is not the smartest approach IMO. Especially since the actual science is far from well understood yet - what we need right now is a whole lot of data gathering and research.

I wanted to repeat this because you have put some of my thoughts into words so well for me, thank you! I am not as sceptical of Global Warming as most here, but I do think it is silly to spend all that capital at this time on a problem we really aren't sure about. When and if the time comes, I believe we'll have the technology to "fix" the problem. Be it solar reflectors in orbit, or seeding the skys to increase reflective cloud cover. Not just that, but the US would be at the forefront of those efforts.

11 posted on 12/08/2005 7:46:29 AM PST by Paradox (Time to sharpen ole Occam's Razor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

Yeah, global warming is a serious problem, all right. I plan on making it one of my top priorities right after we recover from the Great American Heterosexual Aids Pandemic that's gonna affect every family in the country by 1990.... < /sarcasm off>


12 posted on 12/08/2005 8:04:10 AM PST by Kenton (To my friends who celebrate Jesus' birth, Merry Christmas. To the rest of you, have a nice day off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte

The sun does some amazing things, but if I were able to take the actual air temperature rather than the reflected benefit of direct sun on the thermometer it would be a lot closer to -9 than plus 50.


13 posted on 12/08/2005 8:57:01 AM PST by wita (truthspeaks@freerepublic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Paradox

I just wanted to add one more point - any environmentalist that's really concerned about global warming and pollution should be pushing for the US to build as many nuclear power plants as possible to replace coal and oil fired plants. That would greatly reduce our greenhouse gas emissions, as well as having the nice side effect of increasing our energy independence.


14 posted on 12/08/2005 8:59:14 AM PST by PreciousLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty
I just wanted to add one more point - any environmentalist that's really concerned about global warming and pollution should be pushing for the US to build as many nuclear power plants as possible to replace coal and oil fired plants

Another great point that I have brought up before. We SHOULD be pushing Nuclear, and very hard. Its a no-lose proposition. Everyone wins except for the handwringers.

Fact is though, most of the hard left are Luddites, and want to see us living like Native Americans (except for the "eating buffalo" part...).

15 posted on 12/08/2005 9:07:35 AM PST by Paradox (Time to sharpen ole Occam's Razor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: midwyf

I want my global warming!


16 posted on 12/08/2005 10:30:41 AM PST by AmishDude (Your corporate slogan could be here! FReepmail me for my confiscatory rates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GreenFreeper
" Gotta love Stein!:"

Good article. Perhaps as the planet freezes up into an ice ball the likes of big Al Gore will be silenced once and for all.

17 posted on 12/08/2005 10:32:13 AM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wita

Near Greybull.


18 posted on 12/08/2005 11:18:40 AM PST by midwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

GREAT stuff bump! Thanks for posting this!


19 posted on 12/08/2005 1:41:23 PM PST by alwaysconservative (Are we there yet? Are we there yet? Are we there yet? Are we there yet? Are we there yet? Are we)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
We SHOULD be pushing Nuclear, and very hard.

I got a "C" in one of my MBA classes in the early 1980's for arguing with the professor about this. It seemed clear to me that Nuclear energy was the best way to go.

That class was supposed to be an "easy A", but I was too dumb to ask if that meant only for Liberals. The only species they want to see extinct are humankind. The professor was so against the human race that he said he'd never contribute to the problem by having children. I thought that was a good start. :-)
If Liberals never procreate, we might be on the right track.

20 posted on 12/08/2005 3:31:27 PM PST by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson