DELAY HAMMERS EARLE OF AUSTIN [Ann Coulter]

Ann Coulter.com ^ | December 7, 2005 | Ann Coulter

[Babu]

... she does have the personality of a rattlesnake.

Many didn't like General Patton's personality either, but the Germans were sure scared as Hell of him, and rightly so.

Would that but we had a few more prominent conservatives with the "personality of a rattlesnake", as you label it.

P.S. It's irrelevant for the point I make here, but you are just wrong --she's good-looking, and a majority of Freepers agree. Proof: I don't notice any rules for the posting of your or my picture :)

[jla]

Skinny, ugly witch with bleached blonde hair and all the personality of a rattlesnake.

Thin maybe, but you have to admit she's well-proportioned in her thorax area. Nor ugly by any means, she has a quite pretty face. Can't say I know if she dyes her hair, but hey, even Laura Bush does that, so I reckon it's ok. And I wouldn't use "rattlesnake" in describing her personality. She may hurl venom at the liberals, but aside from that, I'd bet she's as gentle as a lamb.

By the way, a good pair of tweezers would avail in removing that burr from your rear end.

[stop_fascism]

How can Annie be so mean to the greatest prosecutor since Jim Garrison.

[Busywhiskers]

I wouldn't say she has the personality of a rattlesnake, but she certainly has the personality of a good lawyer.

[Wolfstar]

What do you think about what she brings to the table?

In an earlier post on this thread, and plenty of times in the past, I have said I largely agree with her politics. But I sure as heck don't have to like her just because she and I share a common political perspective and she skewers the Left.

As for the fawning on FR, as you put, the reason I have begun to react increasingly harshly whenever someone goes into the tired old "rules" thingy and posts a photo, is because Coulter's intellect is the only thing about her that does appeal to me. The "rule" about always posting her photo is demeaning, in my opinion, and it distracts from what she writes.

[Wolfstar]

she's good-looking, and a majority of Freepers agree

Re the good-looking part, beauty is in the eye of the beholder -- and there is no accounting for taste.

Re the majority of FReepers part, whoop-de-do. I follow no herd.

[Paleo Conservative]

Tomorrow is Ann Coulter's birthday>.

[deport]

Interesting replys, but would someone tell me, if Delay was exonorated from the conspiricy charge how does the laundering charge hold water?

---

Apples - Oranges ..

The first indictment was flawed from its issuance just prior to the grand jury's termination. It was for a supposed violation of the election code in 1992 but the code section didn't come into being until 1993. Immediately Earle went to a 2nd grand jury who refused to indict. He then went to a 3rd that had just been empaneled and got them to indict for the 'money laundering charge'..

So the two indictments cover different areas or things in the law.

[RichRepublican]

I thought we were talking about Ann Coulter----not HILLARY!

[Wolfstar]

By the way, a good pair of tweezers would avail in removing that burr from your rear end.

Thanks for the useless advice. Your response and those of several others highlights precisely why I despise that silly, tiresome "rules" business about posting a photo on every thread of hers. Now we must all toddle along with the Ann-is-a-looker crowd no matter what. We must never, ever post a contrary opinion.

(BTW, notice how easy it is to get shunted from what she wrote to how she looks.)

[Big Horn]

I like Rattlesnakes. If you had no arms or legs you would be on welfare. Give them a little credit.

[Wolfstar]

I thought we were talking about Ann Coulter----not HILLARY!

Grin...Hillary is not skinny. As for her personality, I wouldn't insult rattlesnakes by comparing her to them.

[stop_fascism]

As I recall, the conspiracy charge was first and got all the press attention. Unfortunately, the actions leading to that charge were not against the law when Delay did them. Therefor, the judge through the charge out.

Realizing he had a problem, Earle impaneled a new grand jury which indicted his ham sandwich, I mean, new charges. These have the merit that if Delay actually did what Earle alleges, a crime would have been committed. That needs to go a little farther in the process. However, it appears that Earle billburketed the evidence, so those charges are also likely to be dismissed.

[kindred]

[Earle never admitted he had no evidence against Hutchison. Instead, he made a preposterous request of the judge. He asked the judge to issue a pre-emptive ruling declaring all documents that Earle planned to admit throughout the trial admissible — without allowing the judge to know what those documents were or allowing the defense an opportunity to object.]

Earle is insane.

[Wolfstar]

I like Rattlesnakes.

You may have meant your comment tongue in cheek, but just in case...you should know I missed my calling. I should have been a zoologist. I enjoy and/or respect and am curious about most critters on the planet.

[Babu]

(BTW, notice how easy it is to get shunted from what she wrote to how she looks.)

Au contraire, me thinks thou dost protesteth too much. It is you, sir, who throughout this thread have only made personal attacks on her appearance and personality, and called her a "witch".

When it comes to substantive comments from you on what she has written, we so far have only heard the chirp chirp of crickets breaking the silence ...

[AZ_Cowboy]

Coulter Ping!

[Tom Bombadil]

if Delay was exonorated from the conspiricy charge how does the laundering charge hold water?

Laundering and conspiracy are two seperate things. The judge said that the DA's conspiracy indictment did not describe a crime. The DA's laundering indictment did describe a crime according to the judge. This doesn't mean that Delay is guilty, just that the trial is going to be about an alleged crime.

The DA shopped grand juries with the new charge when it became clear that he had made a mistake in describing the first alleged non-crime.

Delay's people have alleged Prosecutorial Mis-conduct, and Mr. Ronnie may just end up looking at the business end of a gavel himself.

[Texas WOP]

Pardon my ignorance, but how can you have one without the other? From what I have read (Captains Quarters/Brainster/American Spectator/Polipundit/ABP etc.)this is NOT an "apple-oranges" situation. Yes, there were, what, 6 grand juries summoned and I doubt #s 4, 5 or 6 understoodn what was actually happening. I'm not trying to start some $h*t, just asking for some clarification.

[jla]

Let's see now, according to you she has the personality of a rattlesnake and is ugly. So what then would compel you to click on to a thread titled DELAY HAMMERS EARLE OF AUSTIN [Ann Coulter]?

Grab a Kleenex, Wolfie and wipe those tears pouring from your eyes.