How could he keep a strait face when he said that to the judge?
1 posted on
12/07/2005 11:54:30 AM PST by
Abathar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
To: Abathar
I know how this guy feels. I didn't mean to look at the pictures, either. Even when I went back for a second look. Honest.
29 posted on
12/07/2005 12:07:53 PM PST by
colorado tanker
(I can't comment on things that might come before the Court, but I can tell you my Pinochle strategy)
To: Abathar
The original bloviating by Aniston's lawyer quoted in
this thread,
the topless photos were taken by paparazzo Peter Brandt, who allegedly used a "powerful telephoto lens" from a perch more than a mile away from Aniston's home,
was hard to accept. More than a mile away? That must have been quite some lens to see something that small from so far away... This article claims that Brandt was about 300 yards away, which is less than a quarter mile, which seems more credible...
31 posted on
12/07/2005 12:08:44 PM PST by
Zeppo
To: Abathar
32 posted on
12/07/2005 12:09:43 PM PST by
dfwgator
To: Abathar
Aniston is seeking monetary damages and a court order to stop Brandt and anyone else from making money from the photos.Put 'em in the public domain where we can all see 'em for FREE!!!
37 posted on
12/07/2005 12:16:34 PM PST by
Willie Green
(Go Pat Go!!!)
To: Abathar
If she walks out into the open topless she has to expect a picture to be taken. I say let this guy do whatever he wants with these pictures.
To: Abathar
Peter Brandt said he wishes "she hadn't just walked out topless."
LOL
To: Abathar
Should we post a picture of Angelina Jolie for every Jennifer Aniston thread? (Ref Maureen "Old Hag" Dowd & Catherine Zeta Jones)
48 posted on
12/07/2005 1:18:12 PM PST by
Niteranger68
("Spare the rod, spoil the liberal.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
