Posted on 12/06/2005 7:04:02 PM PST by SandRat
Lower costs are the reason.
And offset duties... Hidden one.
This is my guess as all F-16 deal offset discussion has been silenced.
It's about time we appreciated Poland.
And what about the southern one? ;)
Not a sheet metal part, but a highly sophisticated composite structure that integrates the protection into the replacement panel structure.
Poland is becoming a solid faithful ally. In return they want help establishing a viable democracy and a growing economy. Sounds like a really good deal to me.
Sounds like you might have inside information about the program. I work part time for a non-profit org that tracks US companies and Govt orgs that violate the Buy-American Act. We have been following this one for the past 2 yrs and it is everything that the article indicates with true work sharing and labor building on both sides of the Atlantic. I also like the fact that they have been sponsoring team building between US small business orgs and Polish industry and not just the big five (Boeing, LM, Bell, Sikorsky and NGC). They have given the little guy a say in what happens. The program seems to have hit a snag recently with the Project Manager being fired outright from the F-14 program for attempting to establish additional cooperation links between Polish and US industries. Appears to be a top-level/congressional inquiry into the details that have surrounded his dismissal. If you are familiar with the workings of the tomcat, you will know that this same guy was responsible for fixing the age old hydraulic swivel leaking problem, or creating a tomcat specific manufacturing line for structural components up in hucklebuck, west, va. the same company from hucklebuck was involved with the Polish company in producing the trans bay access panel for the tomcat. I also know that this guy's actions have given large qtys of bucks back to the taxpayers coffers. The US Navy has a strange way of rewarding its managers for a job well done. So maybe the big five has had the last word after all.
You appear to know a great deal about this program, certain aspects of the tomcat and various inside politics at NAVAIR. I worked around the project pm for a relatively short amount of time and yes he did get things done, but his methods were not what the Navair locals would refer to as being traditional. I would say that his execution plans were unconventional, however I do not wish to imply that he was performing illegal actions. His actions and that of his teammates were above board. My take is that he did not believe in talking so much as taking actions, and was doing things while others would talk about only doing something. This didn't sit well with the power bubbas; especially since it would place the tomcat in a good light and other programs in a not so good light. I actually suspected that the guy might have tripped and hit his head one too many times when someone announced that he was going to Poland to build parts. That swivel thing that you refer to was doomed to failure for a number of reasons. I know that it was attempted at least three times in the past with much larger budgets and had failed miserably, but he and his team were able to pull it off. I wouldnt have believed it had I not heard the positive feedback from the fleet guys. I always new that he was going to be ate up and spit out by the system. Makes sense to shit can him along with the tomcat, when you can ill afford either one of them, or at least that is what certain people would want you to think. What else do you know about the Poland deal? How many polish made panels actually made it onto fleet tomcats before the program was terminated? Are you a former tomcat driver or maintainer? And I would not refer to Bridgeport as being Hucklebuck.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.