Skip to comments.
Possible wall of King David's Palace unearthed in Jersulam
Cleveland Jewish News ^
Posted on 12/06/2005 6:02:09 PM PST by Liberty1970
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: Liberty1970
Possible wall of King David's Palace unearthed in Jerusalem A wall is just a straight pile of rocks. I hope they're not reading intelligent design into a straight pile of rocks.
Humans are infinitely more complex than a straight pile of rocks, and we know that humans are just a series of accidental mutations that proved to be beneficial.
21
posted on
12/06/2005 7:30:57 PM PST
by
RJL
To: Rabid Dog
For all those who say Israel doesn't belong in the Middle East, this will bring some much needed clarification. Many think the Jews only came to the vicinity in 1947. Won't they be surprised when this proves to be Kind David's Palace?!
22
posted on
12/06/2005 7:37:02 PM PST
by
Snapping Turtle
(Slow down and get a grip!)
To: RJL
"A wall is just a straight pile of rocks. I hope they're not reading intelligent design into a straight pile of rocks."
History and truth are important to all of us. "Us" being the same as your royal we."
23
posted on
12/06/2005 7:37:17 PM PST
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: blueminnesota
Royal Seal Unearthed in City of David
(IsraelNN.com) A royal seal dating to the period of the First Temple has been found in an archeological dig in the City of David, adjacent to the Old City of Jerusalem. The seals inscription has the name of Jehudi, son of Shelemiah, one of the top officials in the court of the last Judean king prior to the destruction of the First Temple, King Zedekiah. He is mentioned in the Book of Jeremiah. The seal dates from about 580 B.C.E.
The seal was found at the site which the is the site of the palace of the Judean kings, according to archaeologists under the supervision of Dr. Eilat Mazar of the Hebrew University. Several years ago, another circa-580 B.C.E. royal seal was found in the same site. It had the name of Gemaryahu, son of Shafan, who is also mentioned in the Book of Jeremiah, and was a top official in the court of King Zedekiah's predecessor, King Yehoyachim.
These findings support the description in the Bible of the importance of Jerusalem in Jewish history. The First Temple was the center of Judean political and religious life and is at the center of Jewish claims to historical links to Jerusalem, as repeated by Jews throughout the generations who pray for "Next year in Jerusalem."
24
posted on
12/06/2005 7:37:37 PM PST
by
GarySpFc
(De Oppresso Liber)
To: Liberty1970
To add to your explanation, abandoned buildings were also sometimes 'mined' for construction materials so that they weren't so much buried as taken apart down to ground level.
25
posted on
12/06/2005 7:38:05 PM PST
by
Grut
To: Liberty1970
To: blueminnesota
"...but I don't see how they would establish any modern rights about where people can live today."
The last legitimate international agreement (League of Nations, British Mandate) does, though. Israel is the Jewish homeland. Neo-Nazis (along with their identity religion friends and Euro-associates) are wrong, and they present no more than rhetoric to support their desires.
27
posted on
12/06/2005 7:40:46 PM PST
by
familyop
("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
To: RJL
"Humans are infinitely more complex than a straight pile of rocks, and we know that humans are just a series of accidental mutations that proved to be beneficial."
You're assuming that complexity is evidence for design.
It ain't, thread hijacker. :)
28
posted on
12/06/2005 7:44:15 PM PST
by
adam_az
(It's the border, stupid!)
To: csmusaret
Jerusalem has been conquered many times, and in each of those times when the city is destroyed there is considerable rubble. As an example when the Romans conquered the city in 70 AD after a siege of 134 days Titus did not leave one stone on top of another.
In 132-135 AD there was the second Jewish rebellion, and the Romans once again destroyed the city. These are but two of the times the city was destroyed.
29
posted on
12/06/2005 7:47:25 PM PST
by
GarySpFc
(De Oppresso Liber)
To: RJL
Look at the picture in post number 17, and you will see there is far more than a straight line of rocks.
30
posted on
12/06/2005 7:53:52 PM PST
by
GarySpFc
(De Oppresso Liber)
To: blueminnesota
31
posted on
12/06/2005 7:57:50 PM PST
by
familyop
("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
To: Liberty1970
The muzzzzlims have NO RIGHT to ANY of the Holy Land!
32
posted on
12/06/2005 8:05:32 PM PST
by
Just Lori
(End the leftist occupation of America!)
To: GarySpFc
The Temple Mount is built on top of what was believed to be the First Temple built by Solomon, right? Rumors abound that the Muslims are excavating underneath, possibly to remove any remnants of the Jewish faith.
To: GarySpFc
Spec Ops, huh? Noticed the Latin in the tagline.
To: unionblue83
The Temple Mount is built on top of what was believed to be the First Temple built by Solomon, right? Rumors abound that the Muslims are excavating underneath, possibly to remove any remnants of the Jewish faith.
Some archaeologists and Jewish leaders also raise concerns that the Waqf is attempting to remove any trace of a Jewish presence on the Temple Mount for political reasons.
See: http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2000/003/18.27.html
If you do a Google on "Temple Mount" and "excavating" you will find several articles regarding how the Muslims are determined to remove any historical presence of the Jews.
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPrint.asp?Page=%5CForeignBureaus%5Carchive%5C200505%5CFOR20050506d.html
35
posted on
12/07/2005 6:20:34 AM PST
by
GarySpFc
(De Oppresso Liber)
To: unionblue83
Special Forces to be exact, but that was many years ago.
36
posted on
12/07/2005 6:21:13 AM PST
by
GarySpFc
(De Oppresso Liber)
To: GarySpFc
Doesn't matter how long ago. Thank you for your service and sacrifice.
To: GarySpFc
These findings support the description in the Bible of the importance of Jerusalem in Jewish historyAnd to think that Jerusalem isn't even mentioned in the Koran and Muslims want to claim it as their holy site. That's some real spinning.
38
posted on
12/07/2005 10:14:59 PM PST
by
Lijahsbubbe
(does anyone miss Ted Koppel?)
To: SunkenCiv; restornu
Another David posting....a 3rd title
39
posted on
02/24/2006 1:51:56 PM PST
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
To: BibChr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson