Skip to comments.
FNC: Judge in Texas throws out Part of charges against DeLay(Upholding charge on money laundering)
Fox News
Posted on 12/05/2005 1:38:06 PM PST by John Jorsett
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 361-371 next last
To: OldFriend
Delay will not be acquited if the trial stays in Austin, the Big Blue Anus of Texas. There is no way he can get a fair trial in the lefty/gay capital of Texas. Shame on this Democrat judge for throwing the case this way.
To: OldFriend
He's a liberal bozo from NJ
242
posted on
12/05/2005 2:13:45 PM PST
by
Unicorn
(Too many wimps around.)
To: marajade
From my understanding of this thread, here is what stands:
- Conspiracy charges -- dismissed.
- Change of venue -- not granted.
- Money laundering charges -- not dismissed. Judge will now investigate other motions on this charge, including prosecutorial misconduct.
A mixed bag on the surface, but I think the dismissal of a charge -- any charge -- indicates that the judge is not happy with the prosecutor.
243
posted on
12/05/2005 2:13:50 PM PST
by
AmishDude
(Your corporate slogan could be here! FReepmail me for my confiscatory rates.)
To: fidelio
The money used was not from any criminal activity.
244
posted on
12/05/2005 2:14:12 PM PST
by
pepperhead
(Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
To: shield
Ronnie Earle is now in effect on trial.
245
posted on
12/05/2005 2:14:35 PM PST
by
gov_bean_ counter
(It is easy to call for a pi$$ing contest when you aren't going to be in the line of fire.)
To: AmishDude; A.Hun
It's my understanding that getting a dismissal of charges is VERY difficult, so I think it is a small victory for Delay and a huge defeat for Earle. Priest took one of Earle's indictments and said "nope" before any hearings started. There was no change of venue, so that might not be good, but if Priest is intending the full smackdown of Earle, including prosecutorial misconduct, we are on that road now. It seems to me that he looked at the charges and found them ridiculous, but there must be something to the money laundering charges that needs to be explored.
However, I think that the "something" has to do with Ronnie Earle, IMHO.
246
posted on
12/05/2005 2:14:47 PM PST
by
scott7278
(Before I give you the benefit of my reply, I'd like to know what we're talking about.)
To: Soul Seeker
RINO's---He's BACKKKKKKKKKKKK!!"We have cut all that can be." Tom Delay.
To: moonshine mike
In fact the money laundering charge is the weakest one and hence it is no big problem. Also Delay was not the speaker of the House but the majoirty leader. You need to get your facts right.
248
posted on
12/05/2005 2:15:26 PM PST
by
jveritas
(The Axis of Defeatism: Left wing liberals, Buchananites, and third party voters.)
To: AmishDude
A mixed bag on the surface, but I think the dismissal of a charge -- any charge -- indicates that the judge is not happy with the prosecutor. That's right.
249
posted on
12/05/2005 2:15:37 PM PST
by
scott7278
(Before I give you the benefit of my reply, I'd like to know what we're talking about.)
To: scott7278
A mixed bag on the surface, but I think the dismissal of a charge -- any charge -- indicates that the judge is not happy with the prosecutor.Do you agree? I'm not a lawyer.
250
posted on
12/05/2005 2:16:14 PM PST
by
AmishDude
(Your corporate slogan could be here! FReepmail me for my confiscatory rates.)
To: AmishDude
251
posted on
12/05/2005 2:16:26 PM PST
by
AmishDude
(Your corporate slogan could be here! FReepmail me for my confiscatory rates.)
To: scott7278
Thanks for the take on it. It seems the conspiracy charge was DOA on arrival anyway.
252
posted on
12/05/2005 2:16:32 PM PST
by
A.Hun
To: KC Burke
Hmmm...
DeGuerin had asked to have the indictments dismissed because of prosecutorial misconduct. Priest said he would hear that motion only if he upheld the indictments against the legal challenges.
253
posted on
12/05/2005 2:16:34 PM PST
by
jellybean
(George Allen 2008)
To: scott7278
I think the Judge was simply afraid of the consequences if he threw out all the charges at once.
After all, he does want to eat lunch in that town again.
254
posted on
12/05/2005 2:16:39 PM PST
by
OldFriend
(The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
To: kittymyrib
If the facts are with Delay, he cannot get any worse than a hung jury, even in Austin there will be at least one juror who won't go along with a whitewash.
255
posted on
12/05/2005 2:16:44 PM PST
by
Lakeshark
(Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
To: shield
Ronnie Earle is on trial now, I believe.
256
posted on
12/05/2005 2:16:51 PM PST
by
scott7278
(Before I give you the benefit of my reply, I'd like to know what we're talking about.)
To: msnimje
To: pepperhead
The money used was not from any criminal activity.
Yeah, seems Ronnie doesn't know that....
258
posted on
12/05/2005 2:17:49 PM PST
by
fidelio
To: AmishDude
This case isn't really about money laundering.
It's about redistricting. The dems in Texas and the Clinton holdovers in the Justice Dept. are still foaming at the mouth about that.
259
posted on
12/05/2005 2:17:50 PM PST
by
Liberty Valance
(Give my blankets to my buddies and the fleas to Diamond Joe.)
To: Don'tMessWithTexas
260
posted on
12/05/2005 2:18:23 PM PST
by
Matchett-PI
( "History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid." -- Dwight Eisenhower)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 361-371 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson