Skip to comments.
Fox News Takes 'Journal Editorial Report'
The Associated Press via Yahoo News ^
| November 30, 2005
| David Bauder
Posted on 11/30/2005 6:19:21 PM PST by new yorker 77
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Expect lib kooks to be angry at another move by FNC.
To: new yorker 77
Heaven forfend there should ever be a show with a conservative perspective on the immaculately non-partisan PBS.....
2
posted on
11/30/2005 6:26:54 PM PST
by
clintonh8r
(I hope I'm at home when the GOP Senate Campaign Committee calls for some money.)
To: new yorker 77
To: new yorker 77
Finally something worth watching on FNC besides Britt?
4
posted on
11/30/2005 6:31:07 PM PST
by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: new yorker 77
a storm over political influence at PBS Wait, that can't be right. There IS NO political influence at PBS.
Isn't that what Bill Moyers said?
5
posted on
11/30/2005 6:36:37 PM PST
by
Fido969
("And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free" (John 8:32).)
To: new yorker 77
The government has GOT to stop funding PBS. They can be as liberal as they like, but not on OUR dollar.
6
posted on
11/30/2005 6:40:38 PM PST
by
McGavin999
(Reporters write the truth, Journalists write stories.)
To: new yorker 77
Defund PBS Problem solved
7
posted on
11/30/2005 6:43:25 PM PST
by
Doctor Raoul
(Raoul's First Law of Journalism: BIAS = LAYOFFS)
To: Wife of D28Man
Paul Gigot bumps.
8
posted on
11/30/2005 6:43:33 PM PST
by
mware
(That's Christmas with a C, not an X)
To: new yorker 77
Glad to see this. Thanks for the post. Can't wait till it goes back on air in January. Hooray for Fox! Again!
I would love to see a show on Fox, that does nothing other than pick apart the various polls, showing what the questions were, where polled, etc (how could they get such info?) and THEN sponsor their OWN polls, showing exactly how and what was asked, etc. Might educate some people. Might come up with how crooked some of the "pollsters" are,how the Dems are using them, once again, to shape public opinion, even when they are losing elections.
Wouldn't it be unfunny if the Dems, now realizing that they are losing judicial influence as well as electoral influence, are turning to "polls" to drive their agenda?
9
posted on
11/30/2005 6:44:04 PM PST
by
Anselma
To: clintonh8r
I assume Tomlinson lost his job over promoting this not conservative, not liberal but merely HONEST show on PBS.
Paul Gigot seemed so out of place with the likes of bill moyers, the washington week in review crowd, et al. on the Pure Bull Sh*t network.
The amazing thing is that as a young man in the pre Rush days I watched washington week in review and thought I was actually politically aware. A mere babe in liberal political woods.
To: new yorker 77
PBS stations in eight of the top 30 markets didn't run the show at all, and four ran it in the middle of the night, the Journal said.Yessireee, no political bias at PBS. Uh-huh.
To: new yorker 77
The Journal reported detials of this divorce a week or so ago on the editorial page. (It may be on OpinionJournal.com, I dunno.) It is an outrage, really, showing how unaccountable PBS is. This is related to the ouster of Kenneth Y. Tomlinson.
12
posted on
11/30/2005 6:48:19 PM PST
by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
To: StarFan; Dutchy; Timesink; VPMWife78; Gracey; Alamo-Girl; RottiBiz; FoxGirl; Mr. Bob; xflisa; ...
FoxFan ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my FoxFan list. *Warning: This can be a high-volume ping list at times.
13
posted on
11/30/2005 6:48:24 PM PST
by
nutmeg
("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
To: new yorker 77; ambrose
I knew James Taranto, the voice of opinionjournal.com, when he was a user on my BBS in the last 1980s. A bit of a brush with fame, before we knew it would happen.
He came on my system as "THE BOOD" and wrote a mix of very rude and very insightful posts. I liked him. Of course he shared my poltical views, and it looks like as my views have shifted over time his have shifted in about the same way. I'm very pleased that he managed to get what just about anybody would have thought would be his dream job. I hope he's very happy with it.
I dropped him a line once when I realized "Hey, I knew this guy!" but never heard back from him. Pity.
D
PS Ambrose, you can ping any other ex-DABBS users who might be wandering around here.
To: McGavin999
" ... PBS. They can be as liberal as they like, but not on OUR dollar."
Dittttoooooo. Is it impossible to get a report on their tax funding? Aren't they "non-profit" and because of that, we taxpayers CAN get a hold of their funding records??? I have heard, over the years, that that is an impossibility. Say it ain't so.
15
posted on
11/30/2005 6:48:59 PM PST
by
Anselma
To: Tail Gunner John
It will be nice to see Varney, Gigot and Dorothy Rabinowitz together again.
16
posted on
11/30/2005 6:50:46 PM PST
by
mware
(That's Christmas with a C, not an X)
To: new yorker 77
I just heard a report from steve centanni, fox news, that the Pentagon was writing positive stories for distribution to the proliferating media outlets (much of it radical) in the Arab world . Eek!
So what. Ever hear of Radio Free Europe. They were paid to broadcast the truth to the people who needed to hear it the most.
17
posted on
11/30/2005 6:57:37 PM PST
by
aligncare
(Wasted my time...got my Journalism degree)
To: new yorker 77
A new season will start on Fox News Channel on Saturdays in January.God, I hope they don't stick it in that Saturday morning business block. Those programs have become so annoying....
18
posted on
11/30/2005 7:07:34 PM PST
by
clintonh8r
(I hope I'm at home when the GOP Senate Campaign Committee calls for some money.)
To: new yorker 77
My local PBS station had "Journal Editorial Report" on at 2 AM last week. If it weren't for TIVO it would be hard to prove how unbiased and balanced PBS has become. (/sarcasm off)
19
posted on
11/30/2005 7:59:51 PM PST
by
GOPJ
To: mware
Hey M. Working on homework?
I used to see them on CNBC, I think, and I liked their reasoning, and I especially like the perspective of Dan Henninger. Always seemed well founded.
They will be an asset to FNC.
20
posted on
11/30/2005 8:26:45 PM PST
by
FOXFANVOX
(Tony Snow Fan!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson