Skip to comments.
How the Bush administration got spooked
online Asia Times ^
| Nov 22,2005
| Tom Englund
Posted on 11/21/2005 9:31:02 AM PST by kralcmot
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
"Headline writing is a curious in-house craft - and well worth following. Changing headline language is a good signal that something's up. When the president attacks, it's now commonly said that he's "lashing out" - an image of emotional disarray distinctly at odds with the once-powerful sense of the Bush administration as the most disciplined White House on record and of the president and vice president as resolutely unflappable."
///////
"Lashing out, stalked, dogged, under siege, counterattacking, fighting a rearguard action - let's not just attribute this to "newly aggressive war critics". It's a long-coming shift in the zeitgeist, as evident in the media as in the halls of Congress."
/////////////
"No presidential "counterattack", no "lashing out", no set of speeches or new agenda (to be announced in the 2006 State of the Union Address or anywhere else) is likely to change any of this for the better for this president. Fear is no longer on the Bush administration's side. No wonder they're now afraid - very, very afraid."
//////////////
Above article is the latest in a new media trend....creating a new future by discussing it as if it is already here.
1
posted on
11/21/2005 9:31:07 AM PST
by
kralcmot
To: kralcmot; Zacs Mom
2
posted on
11/21/2005 9:34:17 AM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(Watch the rats re Iraq in 1998: http://media1.streamtoyou.com/rnc/111505.wmv)
To: kralcmot; Grampa Dave
Barf Alert???
"No wonder they're now afraid - very, very afraid."
The demonrats are the ones who need to be very, very afraid,... of burning in hell!!!
3
posted on
11/21/2005 9:42:46 AM PST
by
SwinneySwitch
(Demonrats-beyond your expectations!)
To: kralcmot
"But instead of watching the Democrats fall silent under assault as they have for years..."
I guess I missed that part.. ??
4
posted on
11/21/2005 9:46:12 AM PST
by
Pessimist
To: kralcmot
None of this would have been possible even weeks ago in a country where it was once gospel that you don't attack a president while he's representing the United States abroad. And Bill Clinton went to Qatar last week and said Iraq was a mistake, while Hillary sits on her prim little hands.
This is no "shift." It's a coordinated, strategic attack with no quarter. It's probing with pikes and once blood is stuck you send in the hyenas.
5
posted on
11/21/2005 9:46:41 AM PST
by
GVnana
To: Grampa Dave
6
posted on
11/21/2005 9:48:58 AM PST
by
wildcatf4f3
(admittedly too unstable for public office)
To: kralcmot
Starting on September 11, 2001 - with a monstrous helping hand from Osama bin Laden - the Bush administration played the fear card with unbelievable effectiveness. For years, with its companion "war on terror", it trumped every other card in the American political deck. With an absurd system for color-coding dangers to Americans, the president, vice president and the highest officials in this land were able to paint the media a "high" incendiary orange and the Democrats an "elevated" bright yellow, functionally sidelining them.
Without a doubt, that has to be one of the most absurd paragraphs I have ever seen printed.
7
posted on
11/21/2005 9:52:12 AM PST
by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: kralcmot
Screw the Democrats, as well as the author of this article -undoubtedly a Democrat himself. All their little dreams and schemes depend on a dreamworld that doesn't exist.
To: kralcmot
This guy is coming from an alternate universe. Who ever said we wouldn't take casualties on an ongoing basis? The democratization of Iraq is going as well as I ever hoped it would. The war on terror is going better than I thought it would. But I thought the President would get full credit for his successes in Iraq.
Pres. Bush's failure seems to be in not talking over the US media directly to the US public. This needs to be done daily to get the message out.
9
posted on
11/21/2005 9:57:12 AM PST
by
Forgiven_Sinner
(God is offering you eternal life right now. Freep mail me if you want to know how to receive it.)
To: kralcmot
The lying evil filth that these people carry on the inside can visibly be seen on their ugly faces!
Just look at the pictures that were posted!
10
posted on
11/21/2005 9:57:22 AM PST
by
LADY J
To: Grampa Dave
11
posted on
11/21/2005 9:59:27 AM PST
by
lormand
(Close the border...the US/Kalifornia border.)
To: GVgirl
None of this would have been possible even weeks ago in a country where it was once gospel that you don't attack a president while he's representing the United States abroad.The Democrats changed all that; it's all they have.
12
posted on
11/21/2005 9:59:28 AM PST
by
Howlin
("Victory is not an exit strategy." ``Jack Murtha 11/18/05)
To: kralcmot
To: Grampa Dave; george76

stolen from george76 : )
14
posted on
11/21/2005 10:02:16 AM PST
by
nicmarlo
To: kralcmot
The correct name of this left wing hater of a strong America, is Tom Engelhardt.
He has a long history of hating a strong American and President Bush.
This is just another one of many of his perverted wet dreams posing as an oped.
Below is his website to read about "Imperial America" and other hate America attacks.
http://www.tomdispatch.com/index.mhtml?pid=2131
15
posted on
11/21/2005 10:03:04 AM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(Watch the rats re Iraq in 1998: http://media1.streamtoyou.com/rnc/111505.wmv)
To: Pessimist
"I guess I missed that part.. ??"
Yeah, really. What alternate universe did this nutbar just beam over from? Gotta love these idiots. They've gotten so good at revisionism that they can 'change' history as it's happening.
16
posted on
11/21/2005 10:03:04 AM PST
by
LIConFem
(A fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupi.)
To: GVgirl
one of the audacious wishes of this pile of vile verbage is that the author thinks that no amount of administration counterattack will be effective
in your dreams...on another thread is Cheney's excellent speech...
the poll numbers dropped because of Harriet...not because of the Iraq War...
now that Harriet is withdrawn, Bush will repair his base and move the program forward
17
posted on
11/21/2005 10:05:35 AM PST
by
kralcmot
(my tagline died with Terri)
To: nicmarlo
Those are two of the biggest traitors in our senate.
Kennedy has trained his hand puppet Kerry since Kerry was a teenager, in college, before Nam, in Nam and after Nam.
18
posted on
11/21/2005 10:06:28 AM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(Watch the rats re Iraq in 1998: http://media1.streamtoyou.com/rnc/111505.wmv)
To: DustyMoment
oh, come on,
this is small potatoes
You haven't been reading Maxine Waters, or Noam Chomsky, Robert Speer, etc???
i would like to see a "most outrageous paragraph ever printed" thread here on FR
19
posted on
11/21/2005 10:08:31 AM PST
by
kralcmot
(my tagline died with Terri)
To: Grampa Dave
Those are two of the biggest traitors in our senate. They certainly are.
20
posted on
11/21/2005 10:08:36 AM PST
by
nicmarlo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson