Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Singularity Is Near
http://singularity.com ^ | September 22, 2005 | Ray Kurzweil

Posted on 11/19/2005 11:34:03 AM PST by Momaw Nadon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-162 next last
To: SamAdams76; briansb
"...if cats were to get smarter and learn to read, we would all be in big trouble"

All my cat needs is an opposable thumb for my family to be concerned about their safety while sleeping at night.

Cats are simply evil :-)

141 posted on 11/20/2005 4:58:29 AM PST by Lloyd227
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Smarter, faster, stronger (think Steve Austin), wealthier, live nearly forever = a baby boomer's wet dream.

Remember boys & girls, we're still getting old and we still have to die. Be ready for what's on the other side because the chip won't really save us.
142 posted on 11/20/2005 5:03:50 AM PST by AD from SpringBay (We have the government we allow and deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
What, if anything, can stop exponential technological advances which will lead to the Singularity?

Stop? A reply ago you were saying "forestall". I suppose I can't really say what will happen a billion years from now, but within our own lifetime, there are plenty of options to slow things down to the point where things don't get completely out of our control.

For starters, eliminating patent protection for "advances" in that direction will help take the wind out of the sails.

143 posted on 11/20/2005 8:04:55 AM PST by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: All
For starters, eliminating patent protection for "advances" in that direction will help take the wind out of the sails.

I expect there to be a new arm of "homeland security" instituted to neutralize outbreaks of runaway technology.


144 posted on 11/21/2005 1:20:55 PM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: inquest
For starters, eliminating patent protection for "advances" in that direction will help take the wind out of the sails.

Actually that would probably accelerate the process; therefore I support it.

145 posted on 11/21/2005 1:30:50 PM PST by ThinkDifferent (I am a leaf on the wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: ThinkDifferent
Actually that would probably accelerate the process; therefore I support it.

How do you intend to neutralize the opposition?

146 posted on 11/21/2005 1:32:36 PM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: ThinkDifferent
Actually that would probably accelerate the process

Doubtful. This process requires huge investments of research capital. Without the incentive that comes from patent protection (and, if we cut off government research funds for this sort of thing), not many people are going to want to put up the money.

But if you still want to support the idea, I won't get in your way.

147 posted on 11/21/2005 2:28:13 PM PST by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: All
At the moment, AI and nanotech are in search of venture capital, so it makes sense for them to paint a rosy picture of the future with their products. What more could you offer the world than immortality and God-like powers through nanotechnology?

The fact is they don't have a crystal ball.

They present us with a scenerio that ultimately, humans will lose control of the process.

Nobody in their right might is going to willingly lose control of the process, no matter how wonderful the supposed benefits.

File this one under "S" for Singularity.


148 posted on 11/21/2005 2:55:39 PM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: All

Singularity Juggernaut ping


149 posted on 11/22/2005 7:44:27 AM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: TruthConquers
"... and you will be like God," the serpent said. Be VERY careful.

"and you will be like God, knowing good and evil."

This is already water under the bridge, too late to go back.
150 posted on 11/22/2005 8:03:55 AM PST by johnwayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: inquest
"Without the incentive that comes from patent protection (and, if we cut off government research funds for this sort of thing), not many people are going to want to put up the money."

There is not much incentive anymore. Technological progress is often outdated long before the patent runs out. Companies can do better by keeping industrial secrets. Not to mention that the scofflaw countries such as Russia and China. Eliminate progress in the US, and you push it toward less responsible regimes and cultures.
151 posted on 11/22/2005 1:28:26 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
you push it toward less responsible regimes and cultures.

Nanoterrorism is going to be a bitch.

152 posted on 11/22/2005 4:13:29 PM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Companies can do better by keeping industrial secrets.

If all research is confined to individual companies working independently, without collaboration across (taxpayer-funded) academia, it will slow things down considerably.

Let me ask you this: What do you think would happen to the quantity of output of various types of literature and art if copyright protection was taken away? Do you really suppose it would be any different with patent protection?

Eliminate progress in the US, and you push it toward less responsible regimes and cultures.

If another culture comes up with a technological advance, there's nothing stopping us from making use of it as well, except our own insane willingness to agree to treaties that prohibit that. We put ourselves in greater danger from irresponsible use of this technology by continuing with the mad rush toward making it cheaper and more powerful, than we would by adopting policies that slow down our contributions to it.

153 posted on 11/22/2005 9:14:22 PM PST by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: inquest

We (America) has no choice except "full steam ahead"!


154 posted on 11/23/2005 10:45:49 AM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: All

singularity juggernaut ping


155 posted on 11/23/2005 11:46:59 AM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Ray Kurzweil interview
156 posted on 01/10/2006 12:37:51 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Thanks for the link LibWhacker!

How do I get it to play?

I already tried Windows Media Player and RealPlayer.


157 posted on 01/10/2006 4:32:36 PM PST by Momaw Nadon ("...with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
In his classic The Age of Spiritual Machines, he presented the daring argument that with the ever-accelerating rate of technological change, computers would rival the full range of human intelligence at its best. Now, in The Singularity Is Near, he examines the next step in this inexorable evolutionary process: the union of human and machine, in which the knowledge and skills embedded in our brains will be combined with the vastly greater capacity, speed, and knowledge-sharing ability of our own creations.

In short, Kurzweil is prophesying intelligent design.

But it's permissible because he's an atheist.

158 posted on 01/10/2006 4:35:27 PM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon

Hi, MN!... Are you using Firefox? I couldn't get it to work with Firefox. But once I shut it down and fired up IE, it worked fine... I've noticed it before...Windows Media Player doesn't like Firefox.


159 posted on 01/10/2006 9:06:46 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
P.S. Kurzweil might just be a major-league stoner.

Maybe. My impression is he's a genius, was a child genius, a successful entrepreneur, an egomaniac, and is now a self promoting carnival barker. He is right about some things such as the power of exponential growth, but I think he goes too far in underestimating all the negative forces out there to counteract it. He's not a formal researcher, or subjects his theories to peer review. He writes books for the masses, so he can get his ego stroked and not have to subject himself to tough criticism.

Carl Sagan's brain turned to jello when he became a stoner.

160 posted on 01/15/2006 1:24:45 PM PST by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-162 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson