Posted on 11/10/2005 2:29:24 PM PST by Republican Red
Nam Vet
This is an incredible story; and a posturing media is becoming SOP. . .
That said; it will probably rise to 'gate' level; only with their help. MSM may not be as forthcoming as we would expect. . .to say the least.
Apparently the MSM would RATHER not tell "the truth and nothing but the truth"......
ping
I think Mosk knows all these guys intimately. There was no "third" party...
Here's the relevant provision:
[W]hoever
(1) intentionally accesses without authorization a facility through which an electronic communication service is provided; or
(2) intentionally exceeds an authorization to access that facility;and thereby obtains...access to a wire or electronic communication while it is in electronic storage in such system shall be punished as provided in subsection (b) of this section.
Definitions:
Electronic Communication means any transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photoelectronic or photooptical system that affects interstate or foreign commerce
Electronic Communication Service means any service which provides to users thereof the ability to send or receive wire or electronic communications
Electronic storage means
(A) any temporary, intermediate storage of a wire or electronic communication incidental to the electronic transmission thereof; and
(B) any storage of such communication by an electronic communication service for purposes of backup protection of such communication;
-------------------------------
Now, maybe Free Republic can be considered an "electronic communication service" and FR's database/server/whatever can be considered a "facility through which an electronic communication service is provided", but I don't see how Freepmail qualifies as being in "electronic storage" (as defined above).
What part of the freepmail was not electronically stored?
Do you think they were printed out in hard copy?
Disclosure, this is hyperbole - I do not actually have any such property of Mr. Mosk's.
You dont have it? I do.
His pin # is ****** / sarc.
I'm not sure, that's why I'm asking. The legal definition says, "temporary, intermediate storage of a wire or electronic communication incidental to the electronic transmission thereof", meaning the communication gets stored in one location while en route to another location. I'm not certain, but I'm pretty sure that freepmail doesn't go anywhere beyond FR's server. It never gets downloaded from ISPs in the way that regular e-mail gets downloaded. It's just not the type of communication that ECPA was intended to protect. Besides that, I'm not sure that FR even qualifies as an Electronic Communication Service Provider within the meaning of the act at all.
And beyond all of those concerns, I fail to see how the communication itself had any affect whatsoever on interstate (or foreign) commerce, which is another ECPA requirement.
What do you think the comparison is to Gannon?
Thank you.
Of course, Jim is supported either way he decides.
Whoah...??? Is Steffen a freeper too? I wasn't aware that Free Republic provided a way of using freepmail to contact external email addresses. (Cool feature if so)
Also, does FR log invalid attempts at login? Would seem to me that MD4Bush got hacked into.
I'm replying to you on such a trival matter I'm hesitant to go through with it. Aw, what the heck, here it is; you mentioned that Steffen only responded to the rumors with a, "'yeah I heard that too'....."
Actually, if my memory serves me correctly, that was Libby's or Rove's utterance in the Plame setup. Steffen's was something to the effect of, "Don't go there."
Also, as you know, the left is 'going after' Delay, Bush, Frist and Rush over and above the normal stuff.
Steffen is/was NCPAC.
For sure. . .and they are totally committed to doing/not doing. . .and are no doubt, reassured as the lies/half-truths - distortions/convolutions of the truth. . .do take a toll. . .
Good one Anti-Bubba.
The Enemedia will be destroyed by their own actions.
Take this one down Jim, all in good time.
WaPo admits to using MD4BUSH's screen name and password. They say they had permission from a third party who provided the infor. The problem is, the Post says they do not know the identity od MD4BUSH. So, how do they know they had MD4BUSH's permission to use the screen name and password?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.