Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can biology do better than faith?
New Scientist ^ | November 2, 2005 | Edward O. Wilson

Posted on 11/05/2005 6:34:38 AM PST by billorites

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-179 next last
To: Sir Francis Dashwood

Thanks for bringing me here - just sneaking onto FR for a minute, will be back later tonight!


81 posted on 11/05/2005 2:50:30 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: b_sharp
[Evolution is a observed fact. Evolutionary Theory is what explains how and why evolution occurs.]Apparently this can not be stated too many times. Perhaps PH should have this on his ping notification.

What do you think of this?

EvolutionPing
A pro-evolution science list with over 310 names.
See the list's explanation at my freeper homepage.
Then FReepmail to be added or dropped.
See what's new in The List-O-Links.
If you're new, please read this: But it's "JUST a THEORY".

82 posted on 11/05/2005 2:50:57 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Reality is a harsh mistress. No rationality, no mercy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

"IF your (man's) ancient theory discounts that the Heavenly Father formed fully grown adult human beings, more than two then that is discounting/denying the CREATOR. I will not assert that evolutionists deny a "god", as there are two gods and most don't know the difference. "

So when you said that evolutionists deny the Creator you were just making it up then? Because most don't, no matter what you may choose to think. And there are two Gods? Really?


83 posted on 11/05/2005 4:19:35 PM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Thatcherite
"What is it with the creationist obsession with homosexuality? Why is homosexuality gratuitously dragged into crevo debates by the creationists so often?"

I don't know that most creationists bring up homosexuality in these debates, but there are definitely a few who seem to have a fixation on gay sex. Very telling if you ask me. If the discussion was about interest rates homosexuality would still be brought in to the discussion with these few.
84 posted on 11/05/2005 4:25:27 PM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: b_sharp
Another version:

EvolutionPing
A pro-evolution science list with over 310 names.
See the list's explanation, then FReepmail to be added or dropped.
Check out what's new in The List-O-Links.
For newbies: But it's "just a theory" and How to argue against a scientific theory.

85 posted on 11/05/2005 4:26:22 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Reality is a harsh mistress. No rationality, no mercy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

More than satisfactory


86 posted on 11/05/2005 5:57:40 PM PST by b_sharp (Please visit, read, and understand PatrickHenry's List-O-Links.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: js1138
In the bad old days of East Germany, they build an underground gymnasium and dormitory for their Olympic athletes to live in and train for the Mexico Olympics.

But isn't that going the wrong way?

87 posted on 11/05/2005 6:05:09 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Comes of spending too much time on one's knees.
88 posted on 11/05/2005 6:06:02 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman; Just mythoughts
And there are two Gods? Really?

Only two? Don't forget archangels, angels, seraphim, and cherubim [which are traditionally depicted to suspiciously resemble Eros/Cupid]. Polytheism isn't dead. It doesn't even have the flu.

89 posted on 11/05/2005 6:11:52 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

I like the previous one better. Creationists will not take advice on how to argue, but they have no excuse to make claims about the theory/fact state if you direct them to the information.


90 posted on 11/05/2005 6:16:28 PM PST by b_sharp (Please visit, read, and understand PatrickHenry's List-O-Links.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro

And Powers and Thrones and all the myriad of demons who whisper into the ears of the possessed.


91 posted on 11/05/2005 6:26:20 PM PST by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: billorites
Rapprochement may be neither possible nor desirable.

It's sad to see a scholar display such ignorance like this. The fact is, the ONLY place in the Western where religion and evolution are at war. There are plenty of very religious countries where there is no conflict, and a rapprochment was acheived long ago: Greece, Poland, and Italy come readily to mind.

92 posted on 11/05/2005 6:30:14 PM PST by curiosity (Cronyism is not conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b_sharp
I like the previous one better. Creationists will not take advice on how to argue, but they have no excuse to make claims about the theory/fact state if you direct them to the information.

Well, I've already saved the later one. I can always remove the extra link. As for creationist excuses, have no fear. That commodity is in abundant supply.

93 posted on 11/05/2005 6:30:42 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Reality is a harsh mistress. No rationality, no mercy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Biology is better at what biology does.

Well put. This article is garbage, as if often the case when a scientist attempts to delve into philosophy.

94 posted on 11/05/2005 6:31:59 PM PST by curiosity (Cronyism is not conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: billorites
Woops. I made a typo. I meant say that the US is the only place in the western world where there is widespread conflict between religious people and evolution.
95 posted on 11/05/2005 6:33:29 PM PST by curiosity (Cronyism is not conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
I meant say that the US is the only place in the western world where there is widespread conflict between religious people and evolution.

In the Islamic world, there is virtually no science. Hence, no conflict. How wonderful!

96 posted on 11/05/2005 6:35:35 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Reality is a harsh mistress. No rationality, no mercy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07; airborn503
In fact, communism is the exact opposite of tribalism. It seeks to erase all national distinctions.

When scientists attempt to comment on philsophy or the humanities, they spout nonsense. This guy is no exception, though his critique of intelligent design is spot on.

97 posted on 11/05/2005 6:38:27 PM PST by curiosity (Cronyism is not conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

LOL! Good one.


98 posted on 11/05/2005 6:48:05 PM PST by curiosity (Cronyism is not conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
... all the myriad of demons who whisper into the ears of the possessed.

"There is only one demon."

---- Old priest (Max Von Sydow) to young priest

99 posted on 11/05/2005 6:52:12 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: billorites
Darwin's On the Origin of Species was published 150 years ago, but evolution by natural selection is still under attack from those wedded to a human-centred or theistic world view.

A question from the back of the class. Under "natural selection", just who is doing the selecting?

100 posted on 11/05/2005 6:53:21 PM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-179 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson