Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blacks condemn paper's Thomas editorial
World Net Daily ^ | 11/4/05 | staff

Posted on 11/04/2005 2:43:43 AM PST by pookie18

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last
To: brwnsuga
We just need to be able to accept that everyone has a unique history and origin and that's okay. That's my own personal definition, apparently.

Hiring ANY two people, both white, both minority, both one-legged acrobats would result in two people with "unique history and origin". It has nothing to do with race.....

61 posted on 11/04/2005 3:33:34 PM PST by Onelifetogive (* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: mhking

Your guys in action.


62 posted on 11/04/2005 3:45:01 PM PST by groanup (shred for Ian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

The Milwaukee Journal believes that Project 21 members are only *3/5 Black.


63 posted on 11/04/2005 3:57:45 PM PST by stocksthatgoup (Polls = Proof that when the MSM want yo"ur opinion they will give it to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: airborne
Gotcha. I looked back and re-read some of the posts and I think I either confused a couple different ones, or thought you were trying to answer a different question.

More coffee needed before posting I guess.

64 posted on 11/05/2005 6:28:08 AM PST by Pablo64 ("Everything I say is fully substantiated by my own opinion.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: djf
Since you can't define "law," I went and looked it up for you. A definition that comes close to letting your argument make any sense at all is tenth on the list. If you want to claim laws haven't changed in 1200 years based on some twisted definition of the word, knock yourself out. But using the normally accepted definitions of the word, it is easily refuted and completely unpersuasive.

Nuremburg (sic). Les Miserables. Right. Good arguments.
65 posted on 11/05/2005 10:14:07 AM PST by TN4Liberty (American... conservative... southern.... It doesn't get any better than this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Dustbunny

Many thanks.


66 posted on 11/05/2005 10:57:32 AM PST by Library Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson