Skip to comments.
How homosexuality is 'inherited' (HOMO-AGENDA ALERT!)
BBC.co.uk ^
| 10/13/2004
| BBC News
Posted on 11/03/2005 11:52:10 PM PST by Ultra Sonic 007
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Utterly disgusting. It's old, but the issue is relevant. They keep trying to legitimaze homosexuality by trying to find a 'gay' gene. Meh.
To: DirtyHarryY2K; Mr. Mojo; wagglebee; Behind Liberal Lines; Mr Ramsbotham; durasell; Petronski; ...
'Homosexual Agenda' ping.
2
posted on
11/03/2005 11:53:21 PM PST
by
Ultra Sonic 007
(We DARE Defend Our Rights [Alabama State Motto])
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Inherited? Take me out of that will, please.
3
posted on
11/03/2005 11:53:24 PM PST
by
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Maybe there are general promiscuity combinations of genes.
4
posted on
11/04/2005 12:03:35 AM PST
by
The Red Zone
(Florida, the sun-shame state, and Illinois the chicken injun.)
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Nature encourages mothers to pass on a "gay trait" to their male offspring by boosting their fertility, the Italian University of Padova team believes. Huh? The *gay trait* boosts fertility? The law of nature disagrees.
6
posted on
11/04/2005 12:09:30 AM PST
by
Kryptonite
(McCain, Graham, Warner, Snowe, Collins, DeWine, Chafee - put them in your sights)
Comment #7 Removed by Moderator
To: Ultra Sonic 007
8
posted on
11/04/2005 12:14:28 AM PST
by
CarrotAndStick
(The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
This is really laughable. Another excerpt:
It has also been noted that homosexual males are more often the younger siblings of a number of older brothers. Scientists have said it might be that the mother develops some kind of resistance to the male Y chromosome in her offspring that makes subsequent baby boys more likely to be born gay.
They are blaming mothers for creating gay boys, while also claiming that doing so boosts the ability of these gay children to procreate themselves. ABSURD
9
posted on
11/04/2005 12:14:31 AM PST
by
Kryptonite
(McCain, Graham, Warner, Snowe, Collins, DeWine, Chafee - put them in your sights)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
HOMO-THREAD ALERT!
10
posted on
11/04/2005 12:18:25 AM PST
by
zarf
To: Ultra Sonic 007
What could be the reproductive advantage gained by not reproducing?
To: Ultra Sonic 007
I got pinged for a homosexual agenda?
Let me tell you, after a "certain age" you have enough trouble mustering enthusiasm for your own genitals, much less those of perfect strangers.
12
posted on
11/04/2005 12:41:34 AM PST
by
durasell
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Doesn't the final "Bigger Picture" section scream bias?
13
posted on
11/04/2005 12:43:34 AM PST
by
jamesm51
To: Ultra Sonic 007
There might be...reproductive advantages associated with male homosexuality. Huh?
14
posted on
11/04/2005 12:44:14 AM PST
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
It is a snowstorm of myths designed to sell the concept to the masses. "Well they can't help themselves".
The Sex Positive agenda seeks to eliminate ALL moral judgments over all sexual pairings regardless of age, age differences, sex, relation, marital status, number, or species of partner. They want to get off without any condensation or thinking about it.
Free love isn't free. Children are made to feel obligated to say "yes" when propositioned. Venereal disease runs rampant. Emotional scars lead to drug abuse.
15
posted on
11/04/2005 12:53:12 AM PST
by
weegee
(To understand the left is to rationalize how abortion can be a birthright.)
To: Rodney King; Ultra Sonic 007
There might be...reproductive advantages associated with male homosexuality. Damn right there is...for the straight males, that is.
16
posted on
11/04/2005 12:54:05 AM PST
by
CarrotAndStick
(The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
To: durasell
I don't know. I was just thinking of some Freepers off the top of my head. o.o
17
posted on
11/04/2005 12:57:12 AM PST
by
Ultra Sonic 007
(We DARE Defend Our Rights [Alabama State Motto])
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Well, I'm flattered....I think.
But why doesn't anyone ever think of me when free liquor or food are involved?
18
posted on
11/04/2005 12:59:16 AM PST
by
durasell
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Sexuality must be genetic. When I (male) see a beautiful woman, my reaction is automatic, innate, natural, instinctive. I didn't learn or choose to react this way. It came to me naturally at about age 10. It must be genetic. Age 10 is when most homosexuals realize they are different. Sexual preference must be genetic.
19
posted on
11/04/2005 1:04:24 AM PST
by
1955Ford
To: 1955Ford
I think it goes earlier than age ten.
20
posted on
11/04/2005 1:07:02 AM PST
by
CarrotAndStick
(The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson