Skip to comments.
Scientists See Light that May Be from First Objects in Universe
NASA ^
| November 2, 2005
Posted on 11/03/2005 3:50:05 AM PST by Mike Fieschko
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
To: KevinDavis
To: Mike Fieschko
Thats just about as far back as it will be possible to go.
3
posted on
11/03/2005 3:55:49 AM PST
by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
To: R. Scott
To: Mike Fieschko
5
posted on
11/03/2005 3:59:59 AM PST
by
Rebelbase
(Food stamps, section-8, State paid Child support, etc. pay more than the min. wage.)
To: Mike Fieschko
I am more concerned with whether I should eat Shredded Wheat this morning, or maybe oatmeal.
To: Mike Fieschko
"3 billion years ago when ..."
LOL!!!
Professing to be wise they become fools.
7
posted on
11/03/2005 4:16:06 AM PST
by
nmh
(Intelligent people believe in Intelligent Design (God).)
To: Mike Fieschko
Isaac Asimov has long been one of my favorite thinkers. It took all my limited will power not to jump to the last page. When I read it, just WOW! This was copyright 1956 long before I was aware of the idea of a renewable universe. There are several theories that follow the basic premise but Isaacs is a great twist. A bit of an anthropomorphic Deity, but a great twist.
8
posted on
11/03/2005 4:22:02 AM PST
by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
To: Tom Bombadil
My favorite, Cheerios with raisens. The raisens work like prunes but taste a lot better!!
9
posted on
11/03/2005 4:23:30 AM PST
by
ops33
(Retired USAF Senior Master Sergeant)
To: Mike Fieschko
I may be wrong, but I think this article says: "We took a picture of the sky, and used PhotoShop to remove everything until we got to what we thought was what we wanted."
10
posted on
11/03/2005 4:27:02 AM PST
by
SubMareener
(Become a monthly donor! Free FreeRepublic.com from Quarterly FReepathons!)
To: R. Scott
The phrase 'there is insufficient data for a meaningful answer' had a new connotation for me since the first time I read the story, around 1972.
Had you read it before?
To: SubMareener
I may be wrong, but I think this article says: "We took a picture of the sky, and used PhotoShop to remove everything until we got to what we thought was what we wanted."
Or, it may be 'Eliminate all other factors, and the one which remains must be the truth.'
To: Mike Fieschko
"We think we are seeing the collective light from millions of the first objects to form in the universe,"
I will bet $100 this is all a wild ass guess. A finding like this would cement a number of loose theories about the size, extent and expansion speed of the universe - something which has not been agreed upon as far as I know.
13
posted on
11/03/2005 4:32:51 AM PST
by
txzman
(Jer 23:29)
To: Mike Fieschko
Another 200 million years would pass before the era of first starlight.I wish I could've seen the first star ignite in the midst of the void. Imagine a vast nothing, and then a tiny spot of light appears, as if on command. "And the Lord said..."
14
posted on
11/03/2005 4:39:18 AM PST
by
SlowBoat407
(The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
To: SlowBoat407
Actually, I think they are back to the "and He divided the light from the darkness" part. ;-)
15
posted on
11/03/2005 4:41:27 AM PST
by
SubMareener
(Become a monthly donor! Free FreeRepublic.com from Quarterly FReepathons!)
To: txzman
I will bet $100 this is all a wild ass guess.Of course it's a WAG! Gather data, theorize, seek proof, analyze discrepancies, theorize again.
It's not about being right the first time out. It's about refining a set of theories until they match the known data, and then pushing it until it breaks so it can be refined again.
It's called Science.
16
posted on
11/03/2005 4:42:26 AM PST
by
SlowBoat407
(The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
To: Mike Fieschko
13.7 billion?
Thought they were using 15 billion years as age of universe..
17
posted on
11/03/2005 4:46:19 AM PST
by
Robert A Cook PE
(-I contribute to FR monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS supports Hillary's Secular Sexual Socialism every day.)
To: SubMareener
If you count the Big Bang as "Let there be light", I can see your point.
18
posted on
11/03/2005 4:47:51 AM PST
by
SlowBoat407
(The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
To: Mike Fieschko
It did have a ring of familiarity to it, but not strong enough to say I had read it before. I may have read it 40 years or so ago.
19
posted on
11/03/2005 4:48:03 AM PST
by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
13.7 billion? Thought they were using 15 billion years as age of universe..That's just so it could drink.
20
posted on
11/03/2005 4:48:27 AM PST
by
SlowBoat407
(The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson