Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Here it comes...
1 posted on 11/02/2005 6:24:07 PM PST by livesbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: livesbygrace; Congressman Billybob; Cboldt

Can one of you please explain what the 2/3rds majority thing is all about? Is that specific to CFR in general, or have they been instituting new rules lately?


46 posted on 11/02/2005 7:16:39 PM PST by Seamoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: livesbygrace

If what McPain-Feingold started reaches its natural conclusion, we here on FR will only be able to discuss sports, trivia questions and whether fashion week in Paris/London/NYC met our expectations for the 90 days before every federal election.

The Internet will become what regular TV is, a mind numbing excuse for being alive while on the couch stuffing your mouth with soda and cheese chips.


54 posted on 11/02/2005 8:22:58 PM PST by RicocheT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: livesbygrace
John F. Kennedy: "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

Well, they've gerrymandered and perfected vote fraud: there goes the ballot box.
They're working diligently to take away the soap box.
At this rate, there's only one box left.

56 posted on 11/02/2005 8:45:58 PM PST by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

You can chalk this up to 'friends of Hillary'. They are going to do everything humanly possible to get her elected. This is only part of their master plan to regulate political speech.


63 posted on 11/03/2005 2:58:47 AM PST by ajolympian2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: livesbygrace

The FIRST AMENDMENT guarantees POLITICAL SPEECH to US citizens. It was not put into the Constitution to protect the right of Oregonians to put on live sex shows, as was recently ruled in that God-forsaken state. This FEC ruling is blatantly unconstitutional and this is one reason why we must fight for Judge Alito's confirmation. We dare not let government regulate political free-speech on the internet, the last, best expression of the First Amendment.


66 posted on 11/03/2005 3:49:59 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: livesbygrace

I just hope Alito is in place of O'Conner when this goes to the Supreme Court. O'Conner was the swing vote that allowed CFR to stand.


68 posted on 11/03/2005 4:01:26 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: livesbygrace

WHAT REPUBLICAN IN THEIR RIGHT MIND WOULD DO THAT?


73 posted on 11/03/2005 5:03:40 AM PST by DTwistedSisterS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: livesbygrace

Protect your first amendment. Fight campaign finance law.


74 posted on 11/03/2005 5:20:33 AM PST by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: livesbygrace

The vote:

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2005/roll559.xml

The bill info:

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d109:10:./temp/~bdb8CY::


77 posted on 11/03/2005 5:33:27 AM PST by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: livesbygrace

The text:

Online Freedom of Speech Act (Introduced in House)

HR 1606 IH

109th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 1606

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to exclude communications over the Internet from the definition of public communication.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

April 13, 2005

Mr. HENSARLING introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to exclude communications over the Internet from the definition of public communication.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Online Freedom of Speech Act'.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF DEFINITION OF PUBLIC COMMUNICATION.

Paragraph (22) of section 301 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 431(22)) is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: `Such term shall not include communications over the Internet.'.


78 posted on 11/03/2005 5:34:34 AM PST by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob; P-Marlowe; blue-duncan; jude24

Can any of you tell what this means?


82 posted on 11/03/2005 8:13:36 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: albertp; Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Americanwolf; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
84 posted on 11/03/2005 10:33:38 AM PST by freepatriot32 (Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: livesbygrace

The House voted 225-182 for a bill that would have excluded blogs

hmmm 225 huh? i dont rember there being 225 democrats in office so that must mean that there are a whole hell of a lot of small government "conservative" republicans that voted for this s**t.Wich is excactly why I dropped out of the republican party and am now a card carrying big L Libertarian

85 posted on 11/03/2005 10:46:33 AM PST by freepatriot32 (Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: livesbygrace
lawmakers warned that the Internet has opened up a new loophole for uncontrolled spending on elections.

Read: ...has opened up a loophole for uncontrolled commentary of elected officials that must be closed....

86 posted on 11/03/2005 10:47:01 AM PST by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Hahahahahahahah!!!

Nearly the exact same bill is still pending as H.R. 1605 ...

HR 1605 IH
A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to exclude communications over the Internet from the definition of public communication.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF DEFINITION OF PUBLIC COMMUNICATION.

Paragraph (22) of section 301 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 431(22)) is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: `Such term shall not include communications over the Internet.'.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.R.1605:


HR 1606 IH
A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to exclude communications over the Internet from the definition of public communication.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Online Freedom of Speech Act'.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF DEFINITION OF PUBLIC COMMUNICATION.

Paragraph (22) of section 301 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 431(22)) is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: `Such term shall not include communications over the Internet.'.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.R.1606:

Latest Major Action: 11/2/2005 Failed of passage/not agreed to in House. Status: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 225 - 182 (Roll no. 559).

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquerytr/z?d109:HR01606:


88 posted on 11/03/2005 12:00:40 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson