Posted on 10/31/2005 9:04:55 AM PST by SouthernBoyupNorth
why do we have an educational program that ends in a preposition?
It left me dangling too.
I agree with you, but it's never going to happen. Too many people are locked into the mindset of "something for nothing," which brings to mind another saying: "you get what you pay for." Of course, it isn't really free, but the ones doing the paying are not necessarily the ones doing the getting...at least not directly
something for nothing
Works for any welfare payment...
Handicapping the swiftest...hmmm; good analogy. I like it. Think I might use it.
"Good thing for the private sector to take up, not big government. I want MY choice too--the choice to even have a child. Furthermore, I should have the choice to complain about/for my child. Maybe I should lobby the government so they can pay for my personal choice too. Maybe my neighbors will help out."
I'm not sure I understood this post... are you saying that rather than have vouchers we should do away with public spending for education?
Handicapping the swiftest...hmmm; good analogy. I like it. Think I might use it
SeattleSlew was my favorite. He had a good handicap, whatever the odds.
LOL, I remember that feeling... I was in chemical engineering, but I took some elective economics and geography courses and kept listening in disbelief to all these basket-weaving majors complaining about how *hard* they were.
I'm not sure I understood this post... are you saying that rather than have vouchers we should do away with public spending for education?
Nope. Read the last four sentences.
these basket-weaving majors complaining about how *hard* they were.
That pattern is hard to get down you know, end over end over end over end over end. Mine still doesn't hold water, though sometimes I can hold a candle to it.
If I may suggest you attend a state home school convention this summer in your state. Once you scan the curriculum options, you will be overwhelmed with realization that there is a better option.
It was John Dewey--Thomas Dewey was the Governor of NY who ran against Truman in 1948, and was a strong anti-communist.
John Dewey--Thomas Dewey
They sure knew their decimals though.
"If I may suggest you attend a state home school convention this summer in your state. Once you scan the curriculum options, you will be overwhelmed with realization that there is a better option."
You know MIT has all of it's lessons online for free but that's not what makes MIT - it's the professors and the other smart students. Smart students who have that option still go to MIT insteado using the materials for free at home.
Now, I'm a pretty good math and science teacher. But I won't be home schooling even though I was department head at a good private school because I'm not the best choice to teach all the other courses.
I have a son who is borderline genius. His whole school experience was a nightmare. We tried public school, private school and finally gave up on expecting any school to work for him. I taught him at home and sent him to obligatory public school. He spent most of the day sitting outside the classroom door in the hall. Today he is a successful businessman with multitalents. Musical genius, mathmatical, literary skills. The whole package. So, what's the answer? I think it has to boil down to identifying the individual problem and finding ways around it.
For some of us, homeschooling is not the best option.
We have a winner.
Indeed we do.
Not only that, but this bi-lingual education is doing the same thing.
Yes, the brightest are being left behind. It is another branch of the PC crowd thinking that everyone is the same.
Everyone is not the same we are all individuals and yes some are smarter than others.
Government run schools are just as effective as government itself.
Don't know if he said this or not, but John (never Thomas) Dewey believed that the prime function of public schools was to "socialize" children; academic achievement was secondary. He DID say that teachers must never treat more intelligent children as if they are in any way superior to the rest of the class. Whether or not the quote is authentic, it is not out of line with some of his thinking.
(And frankly, I think kids can use more rote learning in the lower grades, so they have something solid to build on when they do get to be more creative. When you look at the "rote" textbooks of 100 years ago, and see what was required of children then, you have to conclude that Dewey's ideas lead to a decline in academic achievement)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.