Posted on 10/29/2005 4:30:34 PM PDT by ncountylee
Frogs zotted?
But... but... I thought such thing only happen in America?
muslim youth?
Mrs VS
"Immigrants".
hrmn... was TRoP in any way involved?
The French fighting?
Man, just think what these people would do if the police had shot these youths , or beat them with clubs or something.....
I am still trying to understand why these people are upset. But someone mentioned the "M" word, so maybe it starting to make sense.
North African muslims. Take a train north from Paris and you'll think you're in a different country.
From an article about a new Muslim Burger King in Clichy-sous-Bois....
"Clichy-sous-Bois, a Paris suburb of just over 28,000 where 50 percent of the population is under 25 and one-quarter of the wage earners in each household have no job, according to the city's website.
Like many working-class districts on the capital's northern rim, it has a heavy concentration of immigrants and first and second generation Muslims from France's former colonies."
From the sounds of it the French youth are fighting and the police are retreating. Other French capitulation.AWB
Attacks on police and firefighters are common in the suburbs with concentrations of North African immigrants. But I'm sure it has nothing to do with TRoP.
How can they be wage-earners if they don't have jobs? And wouldn't you have to have at least 4 "wage-earners" per household, in order for 1/4 to have no job?
Weird.
French youth upset..imagine that...
I thought all french youth were revolting!
The french are about to lose control of france
IslamoScum fleeing the scene of the crime. Now they are good muslims.
And Nicolas Sarkozy is incredible! He is a fierce pro-American who hates Chirac.
Such is life!
Like vermin they overload housing with multiple families.
This is such first class stupid it doesn't even happen in America. Who would climb a "HIGH VOLTAGE!" fence and snuggle under the equipment for concealment?
That clears up the numbers problem, but I'm still puzzled by the unemployed "wage-earners" :-).
Sorry, I should've just quoted the city stats:
"For more of the quarter of the households, the person of reference is without employment."
I'm assuming person of reference is head of household.
That makes more sense, thanks!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.