Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LOOKING FORWARD (Post Miers NRO and Frum's Take)
National Review Online ^ | 28 October 2005 | David Frum

Posted on 10/29/2005 7:17:04 AM PDT by shrinkermd

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: Rokke

Evidently you believe the President is unable to withstand the sheer power of conservative punditry. I'd like to think President Bush has the power to ignore them.


41 posted on 10/29/2005 3:48:05 PM PDT by garv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles
You and Frump may think that the wound has almost healed, but the Senate Dems will be picking the scab during the confirmation process of the next nominee.

BTW, will you be insisting that the next nominee reveal his position on abortion?

42 posted on 10/29/2005 5:01:56 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: garv
"I'd like to think President Bush has the power to ignore them."

But you absolutely don't want to think that. Earlier in this thread you said the following, "It was imperative for conservatives to force the withdrawl before the Senate hearings." If you want "conservatives" to force the withdrawal, exactly who are they directing their efforts to before Senate hearings? It can only be the President. And the big threat was that if Bush continued to ignore them, the howls of protest regarding her nomination were only going to get louder. "He CAN'T ignore us. We're his base."

43 posted on 10/29/2005 7:24:14 PM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Rokke
If the President was willing to endure the political fallout and continued criticism he could have pushed the nomination. I did not want him to do that and I'm glad the nomination was withdrawn.

My earlier statement was in reference to your assertion that conservative criticism had somehow derailed the constitutional process and that it was hypocritical to deny Ms. Miers an up or down vote.

I am arguing that precisely the opposite is true. If conservative opposition led to her withdrawl it did so within the bounds of the normal political process and, in the end, was to the benefit of everyone. Withdrawl was the only way to avoid two potential bad results. A bad justice for the next 20 years or the political humiliation of the President's nominee being voted down by his own party.

44 posted on 10/29/2005 9:51:03 PM PDT by garv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Rokke
With the exception of the California governor recall, which was a procedural effort put in place with specific guidelines, can you tell me when a petition effort has succeeded in changing the course of events?

Petitions are often one component of a drive toward some goal. They help galvanize opinion, provide people with a sense that they're making a difference, etc. I think it would be difficult to isolate the impact of any petition, but just as in this case there's no doubt that petitions DO have an impact at some level.

45 posted on 10/30/2005 3:54:31 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson