Posted on 10/29/2005 6:07:22 AM PDT by Pharmboy
"It is neither an implication nor false, IMO."
It is a clear implication that anti-semitism motivated some of the posts on this thread, and that, despite your mistaken opinion, is false.
Yada yada yada.
Either concur with dervish, or stand by for personal attacks.
(Yawn)
It was more of an outright statement than an implication.
However, I would be delighted to have my opinion proved mistaken.
"However, I would be delighted to have my opinion proved mistaken."
Oh, I see: "Prove you're not anti-Semitic."
That's fair and equitable. . .in some alternate universe.
The facts are what the facts are. Some people exaggerate beyond the facts. Refusing to accept those exaggerations is a priori evidence of anti-Semitism. We must therefore accept untruths, or be branded anti-Semitic.
Sorry, I refuse to accept that.
An interesting thread about someone finding their Jewish roots, hidden since the Inquisition, drew negative comments about Jews. That's an indication of anti semitism, in my view.
Incidentally, my first comment was not directed at you. I'll go back and read your posts, though.
"An interesting thread about someone finding their Jewish roots, hidden since the Inquisition, drew negative comments about Jews."
Perhaps, in my focus on my conversation with two or three others, I missed that. Where were those negative comments.
"Incidentally, my first comment was not directed at you. I'll go back and read your posts, though."
Ah. Since one of the people I was squabbling with pinged you to the thread, I thought it was.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.