Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Miller 'dismayed' by Times criticism
ap on Yahoo ^ | 10/24/05 | AMY WESTFELDT - ap

Posted on 10/24/2005 5:47:26 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: Zeppo

she can be pardoned.


21 posted on 10/24/2005 6:11:43 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Like I said from the outset, the reason the liberal media is beating her up is that she did not finger Rove and Libby.


22 posted on 10/24/2005 6:12:01 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Basically, the NYT thought it was paying her to put Rove and Libby in jail. You can best believe that if she'd fingered Rove and Libby, they'd love her, and would be talking about how courageous she was to stand up to the powerful (Republican) politicians. She'd be in line for a promotion.

She's being punished for telling the truth.


23 posted on 10/24/2005 6:15:38 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
New York Times reporter Judith Miller is defending herself against her own paper's criticism of her role in the CIA leak controversy, saying she was proud to serve time in jail to protect a confidential source, "even if he happened to work for the Bush White House."

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I was under the impression that Libby never asked to be protected and released her to testify from the start.

I thought the reason she went to jail was because she wanted the scope of questioning limited to her contacts with Libby only, which means it was someone else she was protecting.

24 posted on 10/24/2005 6:17:49 PM PDT by Shethink13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
Yes, she can... But a lot of folks have (correctly, I believe) deduced that she sat in jail for 85 days, not to protect Libby, but to protect a squad of other confidential sources. So, is she now going to speak truthfully about everything that she tried so hard to keep hidden?

Of course, at the time she was probably not expecting the long knives of the NYT to come out and skewer her, and this turn of events could lead to an epiphany, especially if the skids were to be greased with a hefty book publisher's advance... That would be too late to help the Bush administration people who are currently in Fitzgerald's sights, though...

25 posted on 10/24/2005 6:21:02 PM PDT by Zeppo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Shethink13

correct.


26 posted on 10/24/2005 6:23:17 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Zeppo

Note to Judith. I hope you have cashed all your paychecks from those days in the can. You have been working for a bunch of unprintable fecal matter.


27 posted on 10/24/2005 6:28:43 PM PDT by 308MBR (Walnut stocks with steel buttplates are pretty effective in close quarters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Shethink13

she wanted the scope of questioning limited to her contacts with Libby only

Yup, according to her the questions were limited to Libby. Lets hope the other sources were connected to the NYT or the MSM.
Hope she sings and sings and sings!


28 posted on 10/24/2005 6:29:52 PM PDT by ConservativeGreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: mosquitobite

They want her to say Libby but she might accidentally say Rand Beers.


29 posted on 10/24/2005 6:30:23 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: the_Watchman

AUGUST 2002 - MARCH 2003 : (RAND BEERS IS 'MAIN' WHITE HOUSE 'COUNTERTERRORISM ADVISOR')------- "Former security advisor says Bush failing to counter terror threat ," AFP via Yahoo, June 16, 2003 Monday, 2:36 PM ET


30 posted on 10/24/2005 6:31:15 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Judith Miller = Mary Mapes.


31 posted on 10/24/2005 6:40:46 PM PDT by TheForceOfOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I love it when they turn on each other. Did anyone catch the Maureen Down column. She's clearly Sulzberger's lap b*itch.


32 posted on 10/24/2005 7:10:47 PM PDT by LA Conservative (The fourth estate is the fifth column)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeGreek

I really hope she has that epiphany, and doesn't accidently turn up dead in the near future. Sheesh what a sh&t storm that would be!


33 posted on 10/24/2005 7:11:53 PM PDT by lafroste (gravity is not a force. See my profile to read my novel absolutely free (I know, beyond shameless))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: the_Watchman

Yes,that`s right,George and Dick asked Joe to go to Niger for them.


34 posted on 10/24/2005 7:13:17 PM PDT by presidentsfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: lafroste

doesn't accidently turn up dead

There are many parks in NY. I hope not. She is confused, but something tells me she wants to do the right thing?


35 posted on 10/24/2005 7:18:54 PM PDT by ConservativeGreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: presidentsfriend

"Niger!" Ooh, what you said! Oh, right, that's the country.


36 posted on 10/24/2005 7:18:56 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

What the AP leaves out from Miller's memo is the most important part. That after she requested to pursue the Wilson/Plame story, it was Times Editor Abramson who told her not to.


37 posted on 10/24/2005 9:22:00 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

"Is the Times doing this to sell papers?"

The Times is doing this to make the Bush Administration look like villains. And to protect their soulmates, Wilson and Plame.


38 posted on 10/24/2005 9:24:19 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Williams

"Sounds like they're blaming her personally for the war in Iraq."

And anything else they can think of. Having refused to become part of their "solution", she is now part of the problem.


39 posted on 10/24/2005 9:25:45 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; aculeus; Senator Bedfellow
Maureen Dowd, finalist, “Most disgraceful column ever.”
40 posted on 10/24/2005 9:31:23 PM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson