Skip to comments.
Mac OS X inherently secure, hackers not interested
MacNN ^
| 10/24/2005
Posted on 10/24/2005 10:52:07 AM PDT by Panerai
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
1
posted on
10/24/2005 10:52:10 AM PDT
by
Panerai
To: Swordmaker
2
posted on
10/24/2005 10:53:08 AM PDT
by
Panerai
To: Panerai
attackers' lack of interest in an operating system whose share of the market is in single digits. Again, I would point out that there are viruses for freaking CELL PHONES, where the number of units in the field is 1% of the Mac population.
If it was based on sheer numbers, why would that be true?
3
posted on
10/24/2005 10:55:47 AM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: Panerai
Not that I dont believe that Macs are not a good platform - the reality is that punks dont create hacks for Mac because there are so few.
Why work hard to develop a virus or attack on a platform with few users when you can do the same ammount of work (maybe less) for an OS that can hit hundreds of times worse?
To: Panerai
Wow. So in case any hacker was uninterested in this OS, your skills have now been officially challenged.
5
posted on
10/24/2005 10:57:36 AM PDT
by
BostonianRightist
(I looted New Orleans and all I got was 40 of these lousy taglines.)
To: Panerai
Mac users: "Mac OS cannot be hacked!"
99% of hackers: "What's a Mac?"
6
posted on
10/24/2005 10:59:28 AM PDT
by
TommyDale
(I'm not schizophrenic, and neither am I...)
To: Izzy Dunne
Again, I would point out that there are viruses for freaking CELL PHONES. A cellphone virus is an elite hack. Mac OS X is a snoozer.
7
posted on
10/24/2005 11:10:04 AM PDT
by
Smogger
To: BoBToMatoE
Why work hard to develop a virus or attack on a platform with few users when you can do the same ammount of work (maybe less) for an OS that can hit hundreds of times worse?All the more reason for conviction of hacking crimes to carry mandatory castration - not that it would affect their lives much.
8
posted on
10/24/2005 11:13:09 AM PDT
by
SlowBoat407
(The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
To: BoBToMatoE
the reality is that punks dont create hacks for Mac because there are so few. The mac platform is inherently more secure due to its basic design, processes need specific user permission to do the things that are easily done by any application in windows.
I'd recommend anyone looking at the security aspects of the Mac platform read Winn Schwartau's blog at: http://securityawareness.blogspot.com/2005/09/mad-as-hell-switching-to-mac-1-16.html, and you'll understand why so many network security professionals have switched to Mac.
9
posted on
10/24/2005 11:13:54 AM PDT
by
va4me
("Government isn't the solution to the problem, it is the problem" - Ronald Reagan)
To: BostonianRightist
Steve Jobs should announce a prize for the best hack of OS X. Maybe an iPod and a years subscription to iTunes. But iDigress.....
To: BostonianRightist
Yeh. Anyone stupid enough to announce publicly that his OS is unhackable will either be hacked within a week or already has been.
To: Panerai
Mac OSX
12
posted on
10/24/2005 11:17:33 AM PDT
by
Uri’el-2012
(Y'shua <==> YHvH is my Salvation (Psalm 118-14))
To: Panerai
And in other news - The sky is blue and the Earth is round.
13
posted on
10/24/2005 11:18:04 AM PDT
by
SengirV
To: BostonianRightist
PLEASE, this has been stated time and time again for YEARS, with no ill effect.
14
posted on
10/24/2005 11:18:51 AM PDT
by
SengirV
To: TommyDale
Funny, I was just off the phone with a buddy who's on WINDOWS XP (I'm on a Mac and have been for years now)... Poor fellow was trying to just launch an application that would allow him the simple task of uploading files to my server (FTP)...
We finally gave up, the unintuitiveness and ridiculous complexity required by the windows interface prompted him to just send me the images via CD/FedEx...
You know Windows users are very gung ho about their OS and it's nerdy world, but give me a machine that let's me WORK on the tasks at hand versus trying to FIGURE OUT HOW to do something any-day...
Simplicity in interface means progress on your tasks...
15
posted on
10/24/2005 11:19:00 AM PDT
by
Barney59
(I've had a perfectly wonderful evening. But this wasn't it.)
To: Barney59
Give me something that I can actually find applications for.
16
posted on
10/24/2005 11:26:13 AM PDT
by
TommyDale
(I'm not schizophrenic, and neither am I...)
To: Barney59
"ridiculous complexity required by the windows interface"
So what threw you - the 2nd & 3rd mouse buttons or the lack of the 'splat' key?
To: va4me
"...why so many network security professionals have switched to Mac." Can you cite some statistics? I don't know anyone in the professions outside of artists, desktop publishers or musicians who use them.
18
posted on
10/24/2005 11:28:39 AM PDT
by
TommyDale
(I'm not schizophrenic, and neither am I...)
To: Panerai
A Mac user worrying about getting hacked is like Helen Thomas worrying about getting an STD. It can happen, but it's not likely.
19
posted on
10/24/2005 11:31:03 AM PDT
by
phugg
To: Barney59
Poor fellow was trying to just launch an application that would allow him the simple task of uploading files to my server (FTP)... We finally gave up, the unintuitiveness and ridiculous complexity required by the windows interface prompted him to just send me the images via CD/FedEx... Odd, I run Filezilla on XP every freakin' day and have no problem with it.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson