Skip to comments.
Bush at bay
UPI ^
| Octo 24 05
| Martin Walker
Posted on 10/24/2005 10:14:17 AM PDT by churchillbuff
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
To: churchillbuff
Re: ".....the forgery of documents on African uranium that started the investigation....."
It took UPI just one day to pick up on the journalistic fraud that the Associated Press started on Sunday.
The info that Iraq might be trying to purchase yellow cake uranium from Niger came from British Intelligence, NOT from the forged document.
Both Tony Blair and the British Intelligence chief stated publicly, AFTER Bush's speech to Congress, that their information on Iraq and Niger was accurate and had NOTHING to do with the forged document.
To: churchillbuff
Heard on Rush earlier today that he didn't believe that either Plame or Wilson have met with special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald during his investigation. Can anyone confirm this?
To: jennyjenny
23
posted on
10/24/2005 11:06:35 AM PDT
by
WhiteGuy
(Vote for gridlock)
To: churchillbuff
I'll huff and I'll puff til I blow your house in..........or
give the liberals something to howl about.
RUBBISH!
To: shamusotoole
The Docs. ARE a big deal if you are trying to take down a sitting President during wartime, and you are getting the help of foreign Nationals to do it.Maybe to the leftists and other really stupid people of America.
25
posted on
10/24/2005 11:23:57 AM PDT
by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: churchillbuff
It is this central issue of good faith that the CIA leak affair brings into question. The initial claims Iraq was seeking raw uranium in the west African state of Niger aroused the interest of vice-president Cheney, who asked for more investigation. At a meeting of CIA and other officials, a CIA officer working under cover in the office that dealt with nuclear proliferation, Valerie Plame, suggested her husband, James Wilson, a former ambassador to several African states, enjoyed good contacts in Niger and could make a preliminary inquiry. He did so, and returned concluding that the claims were untrue. In July 2003, he wrote an article for The New York Times making his mission -- and his disbelief -- public. Almost everything in the paragraph is a lie. The CIA did not supply the Niger info at Cheney's prompting, and Wilson's report was non-committal about the Niger business.
My guess is Fitzgerald will show (if he's really digging into it) that the CIA fabricated the Niger docs to deliberately embarass the Bush admin.
To: RexBeach
Why am I thinking that he resgined when he ran for president?
27
posted on
10/24/2005 11:53:51 AM PDT
by
KC_Conspirator
(This space outsourced to India)
To: KC_Conspirator
Like me you were engaging in wishful thinking!
Thank the Dear Lord there's only one Kucinich in the House. He's a very unusual person.
28
posted on
10/24/2005 11:56:44 AM PDT
by
RexBeach
("The rest of the world is three drinks behind." -Humphrey Bogart)
To: pierrem15
My guess is Fitzgerald will show (if he's really digging into it) that the CIA fabricated the Niger docs to deliberately embarass the Bush admin."""
As an old-time conservative, I sometimes feel like I'm in a bizarro world, on FR these days. It used to be Red China, the USSR, Cuba and foreign and domestic leftists who hated the CIA, and cheered the outing of CIA operatives. Now it's neocons who hate the CIA and accuse it of the kind of shenanigans that Mao and Brezhnev and Castro used to accuse it of.
To: KC_Conspirator
30
posted on
10/24/2005 12:13:46 PM PDT
by
Cyber Liberty
(© 2005, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
To: churchillbuff
This suggests the inquiry by special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald into the leaking of the identity of undercover CIA officer Valerie Plame has now widened to embrace part of the broader question about the way the Iraq war was justified by the Bush administration. No, if there's any truth to it, Fitzgerald is more likely investigating who forged these documents and tried to foist them on the Administration. French intelligence? The clintonoids at the CIA? A little of both? Plame and Wilson?
31
posted on
10/24/2005 12:21:22 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: churchillbuff
Now it's neocons who hate the CIA and accuse it of the kind of shenanigans that Mao and Brezhnev and Castro used to accuse it of.Neocons or no, if the 'selective leak' shoe fits the agency, they should enjoy wearing it. Sorry, but I know people know what they're talking about when it comes to the Agency, and they're even more appalled by its current incarnation than I am.
To: churchillbuff
33
posted on
10/24/2005 12:24:01 PM PDT
by
verity
(Don't let your children grow up to be mainstream media maggots.)
To: churchillbuff
I have personally known a few people at the CIA who were decent patriots. But there has always been a faction who leaked to liberal news sources such as the Compost and the Times to embarrass Republican presidents, from Reagan to Bush, and that faction got a lot larger after clinton and Tenet got through promoting their buddies.
This is not to say that the CIA is the enemy, but that regretably it has been subverted or even coopted by enemies of our country's real national interests.
34
posted on
10/24/2005 12:24:44 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: churchillbuff
The CIA leak inquiry that threatens senior White House aides has now widened to include the forgery of documents on African uranium that started the investigation, according to NAT0 intelligence sources. The Frogs did it.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson