Posted on 10/23/2005 4:30:53 AM PDT by ovrtaxt
Does it abduct you and give you enemas? That'll wake you up!
whatever....
I think I would be willing to pay Farah to GO AWAY, but not for anything that he puts out. Generally when Farah puts something out, and you do the opposite of what he advocates, then you will be correct 99.9999% of the time...
(singing) The best part of waking up....
..... is an 80 foot satellite dish sticking out of your a&&!
didn't ya know, you can't call Bull$hit if someone doesn't want too and they ALWAYS go for the signup date ya know?
:-)
lol- I like him because he's willing to put stuff out that nobody else will touch. He's got a great book out however, that's a good serious piece. Basically, he's calling for patriots to actually DO SOMETHING about the rising undercurrent of Socialism in our country.
You ever hear Les Kinsolving's questions at the WH press briefings? Priceless! McClellan probably hates him.
Good comment about the signup date, "Pwnr of noobs". I wasn't hammering him on the date, just expounding on the big picture.
But nevermind the facts...
I don't even care who Les whateverhisname is saying.
Farah is a loon.
Anyone else here FASTING for Roy Moore's governorship?
Anyone still working on their Y2K bunker?
Or how about, is anyone here REALLY considering trying to impeach GW Bush?
Farah is a loon. The nice thing about the internet is that loons get their say now. Except MOST bloggers are free, but Farah's blog turned "newsletter" is a payforplay site now.
Well, I don't pay fot it. Let the free market work.
No, didn't know that and the reason I don't is because there is absolutely no evidence when he was in the Phillippines he was meeting with muslim terrorists. But, you see, you have taken a small element of fact (he was in the phillippines) and added information that has only been provided by very sketchy people and deduced from that there is a link between OKC and Al Qaeda. It is the exact same thing the Kennedy assasination conspiracy theorists do all the time. Take a tiny little bit of useless information and turn it into a major theory. But, I guess my big question to you is, aftern having implicated Al Qaeda in many terrorist act (african embassies, USS COLE, first Twin Towers attack, barracks in Saudi Arabia) you then state the government wants to avoid implicating muslim terrorists and only "had to" with 9/11 because it was so obvious. Whenever conspiracy theorist get involved in their conspiracies it ALWAYS involves a coverup by the US government for reasons that make absolutely no sense whatsover. We go to war with Iraq on the one hand, but we want to cover up Muslim involvement in terrorism. It's a goofy proposition. The US government is simply incapable of covering anything up. If they could you wouldn't have so many scandals all the time.
Like the OU kid a couple of weeks ago. The contortions that the authorities and the media performed to separate that kid from the mosque and his roommate were an indication of how badly they want to disconnect Islam from more domestic terrorism, which is the original point of our discussion.
And then you have the example of Able Danger- if it wasn't for Weldon going on the radio, and preaching about it on the House floor, we would never have known what we all suspect, that 911 was an example of negligence by forces in the government who were more concerned with protecting their illegal dealings with China than protecting the American people. Now we're seeing the current group of leaders running cover for them!
Anyway, I don't disparage your skepticism- it's good, and it keeps research healthy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.