Miers panel to hear "explosive" testamony? (Texas Lottery-related)

WND ^ | Oct 21 05 | WND

[Buddy B]

So what is testamony?

A horse...

1. Deputed Testamony

2. Deputed Testamony

[I8NY]

I don't know but it sounds painful...

[I8NY]

WHY did W find it necessary to open up this can of worms??? WHY?

[George W. Bush]

Is this the same Swift Boats writer, Jerome Corsi who used to post here?

Anyway, I don't see much new material here. I guess I preferred it when Novak reported much the same stuff a few days back based on John Fund's reports on Monday.

Maybe my memory is poor but I don't see much new material here.

[PeoplesRep_of_LA]

Okay, clueless one, explain to me how I'm cornered and how your response remotely describes my response.

I will, insulting one.

This is probably the 3rd or fourth damning revelation this week, not to mention the primary concern of conservatives familiar with the topic of judiciary malfeasance; her qualifications as a strict constructionalist. The logical response to this, unless you are referring to past conversations with churchhillbluff would not be to paint him into a corner that his motivation was somehow a personal hatred of our Republican President. That smacks of such a need to provoke an arguement not related to the topic of this article quite similar to the old "when did you stop beating your wife" strawman.

[ez]

Two points...

This essentially says that Ben Barnes "blackmailed" the administration into accepting the firm he lobbied for "or else" he would make the Nat Guard story public, I guess.

Littwin wanted to reopen the bidding to other companies. Any evidence he was affiliated with any of these OTHER companies trying to get the Lottery contract?

[ez]

Wouldn't it be ironic if the Dems gave MIERS an UP vote and the Pubbies voted her DOWN? Snicker/Snicker

Never happen. If the R Senators recognize the right of clinton to appoint Ruth Buzzi Ginsberg, how will they claim that Bush does not have the right to choose Miers. The R Senators will vote to affirm with 2 or less defections, imho.

[Dog Gone]

One has only to look at churchillbuff's posting history to see a pattern of hatred toward this Presidency. Look for yourself.

I was curious where it ranked on an absolute scale.

I'm still not cornered, and this is not a damning revelation to anyone who lived here in Texas when all this transpired. It's not new news. The fact that it's news to others isn't surprising, I suppose.

[PeoplesRep_of_LA]

One has only to look at churchillbuff's posting history to see a pattern of hatred toward this Presidency. Look for yourself.

Well I figured it was probably due to that as it was an odd comment to make otherwise.

I happen to remember him on here as well and remember he is a true conservative, perhaps not a true Republican. I think those passionately supporting Bush need to remember that those people aren't heratics, and do their best to reason with them. After all Bush can't run again, but conservatives are going to be needed to be engaged in politics in 08, even those that don't think George W Bush is the greatest President since Lincoln.