Whose common sense? It is common sense for tyrannts to remove guns that could threaten their rule. 
Posted on 10/19/2005 2:09:36 PM PDT by bigsky
I've been saying that Ann needs a donut for at least 4 months now :-)
yes my tongue is planted FIRMLY in cheek when I say this too.
LOL! It's beyond irony that we're accused of attacking her when she's been attacking the administration and Miers for weeks now.
Maybe we should all mail her a donut :-)
And by the way, it's "tryst" not "trist." :)
Oh, one would think Ann would find a way to mention in a public appearance that it is not true that she's dating a young boy barely out of his teens. She needn't go to the lengths you described.
she can have her opinions, but when she breaks out great phrases like the one about Bush drinking again, that is straight out of the leftist playbook IMO.
That said, I think Ann is generally spot on, with the exception of Roberts (she was really wrong), and we don't know yet about Miers (at least I don't). We shall see....
Besides she is dating some pretty boy cowboy wannabe so I guess HE likes her being rail-thin....
Thanks for pointing out the typo. Preview would be my friend, if I'd allow it.
How could Sam possibly know it isn't true if there's no retraction. I understand there are things people in the news let slide. I also understand there are other things they would NEVER let slide.
Sam's going to come up with a retraction for me, I just know he would never make a claim without evidence. Freepers don't do that. Do they?
That comment about Bush drinking was the final straw, imo.
I still think she's smarting at being so wrong about Roberts. Re Miers, I have no idea and am so neutral on the nomination that it's cracking me up to see someone on this very thread try to link me with Harriet supporters.
Ach - some days I think freepers have lost their ever lovin' minds.
LOL
I think they may confuse you with Howlin. I do sometimes myself because I skim instead of really reading too...I don't know why either....
at first I was going to support the nomination simply because everyone was screaming so loudly that it would be a fun thing to do in spite :) But when it comes down to it, I am waiting on the hearings before I decide (or really care).
One of Novak's recent columns said that the President's second choice was Consuelo Callahan, a judge who was recommended by none other than Chuck Schumer. If that's true it's mindboggling.
I'm waiting for the hearings too. Take care, Mike.
I'm still chuckling about that donut :-)
I guess he could tell you, but then he'd have to, well, you know...:)
Don't let it keep you up nights, Granny. :)
Not to worry. The only thing that would keep me awake would be if I was scrambling trying to come up with a document that doesn't exist. Perhaps Sam should give Dan Rather a call.
Whose common sense? It is common sense for tyrannts to remove guns that could threaten their rule.
Ann is my favorite, but I have to say... I get up extra early to see Kiran Chetry on FNC while I get ready for work.
Me too, Ah really don't give a dang what she does or yaps! Good post Mike!
Probably the second choice of the Democrats, chosen for potential to embarrass the President. She's the one who tap danced on a table, no?
"I just know he would never make a claim without evidence. Freepers don't do that. Do they?"
This is an interesting comment giving the tendency over the last several days of various freepers to denounce someone and continually emphasize their supposed molestation of "man-children," when there is no compelling evidence to support this. If this story were proven true, I would be as disgusted as you are, but I think it is important to always maintain a level of scepticism regarding any mainstream media outlet, particularly where a tabloid gossip column written by a former liberal blogger is concerned. The Left loves nothing more than to charge conservatives with hypocrisy, so I would take this with a grain of salt. If you actually read the piece and consider its content, it is internally inconsistent and seems rather implausible. The story is from nearly 6 months ago, and was refuted at the time. Before Freepers and other grassroots conservatives were upset with Coulter over Miers and Roberts, they claimed to believe the story was untrue.
I read on another conservative forum back in May that a poster ran into Coulter in LA when she was there to appear on Leno et al, and they asked if she had converted her liberal boyfriend to conservatism yet, and she was apparently taken aback and said she didn't date democrats. The "I refuse to confirm or deny" response she emailed to the gossip column was supposedly a joking way of blowing the story off. That's not how I would have responded to such rumors, but she does have her own particular sense of humor.
"What Coulter wants is a judicial oligarchy."
NO she doesn't! She wants a strict constructionist judge who is willing to say "that's not my job" rather than making "common sense" rulings. IOW, rather than ruling on an unenforced Connecticut law, the court could have refused to rule thereby eliminating one of the steps used to get to Roe v. Wade.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.