Posted on 10/17/2005 2:40:50 PM PDT by Cautor
Souter was a crony? Souter had no paper trail? On the contrary, he was not personally know by Bush 41 and his paper trails was very conservative. Something turned him. A skeleton in his closet?
Souter was a crony? Souter had no paper trail? On the contrary, he was not personally know by Bush 41 and his paper trails was very conservative. Something turned him. A skeleton in his closet?
People forget that the Party, any major party, is a coalition. Bush is a man in the middle of a largely conservative party. He is to the right of center. But the party contains many powerful and influencial men who are left on center, at least on the social issues. Look at how business has rolled over for the gay agenda. Guliani is typical of that part of the national elite that supports Republican candidates.
FBI files? Just a theory...
And he is a single guy, right?
Yup.
My guess is that we will never know. Files get dumpted, letters get shredded/burned. The myth of scientific history crumbles before the fact that so many documents are never made public. I recall the storyt that Robert Lincoln had burned many of his father's papers and let slip that the Presient's cabinet had contained a traitor. Meaning?
Because Democrats should never be in power.
Never forget that.
See my post 79.
There is something to that.
Republicans certainly suffered electorally, albeit briefly, following their triumph over Soviet Communism.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.