Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another Outrage from Child Protection Services
Emial | 10/17/05 | Mark I. Johnson

Posted on 10/17/2005 12:14:30 PM PDT by Carry_Okie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 381-390 next last
To: BeHoldAPaleHorse

Go visit:

http://www.attach.org

This organization recommends therapies and trains "therapists" in some pretty unorthodox "therapies" for attachment disorder kids.

I wonder if the "therapist" referred to in this case was trained through this organization. If so, I understand why CPS is not all that interested in talking to him/her.

These folks are the "rebirth" folks. Other therapies they use include restraints and other odd things.

I note that the "therapist" has not been named. I'd be interested in knowing that name, so I could do further research.


61 posted on 10/17/2005 1:14:03 PM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: LegionofDorkness

Possibly the room was bare of ornamentation and furnishings. Absolutely reasonable with a child who has destructive rages and tantrums.


62 posted on 10/17/2005 1:15:26 PM PDT by Politicalmom (Must I use a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
No child is ever deserving of harsh, irrational, undignified, painful treatment, especially by, or at the direction of, a therapist.

Don't we all agree on that, for goodness' sake?

63 posted on 10/17/2005 1:15:50 PM PDT by Saundra Duffy (Never forget Terri Schindler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

OK, here is my prediction as to what happened: They are practicing some nutjob therapy on the kid. Probably including holding or tying the kid down, which is why the room smells like urine. The baby sitter asks the kids what the deal is, and the kids describe the nutjob therapy. The babysitter tells the mom, who calls the government. The government has dealt with this before, so they went to see the place. Mr. Johnson doesn't let them in, but says "hey, go speak to the therapist". The government knows that the therapist is a nut-job, so they become concerned for the kid.


64 posted on 10/17/2005 1:16:43 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Don't we all agree on that, for goodness' sake?

One would think so, but apparently a lot of people practice these quack therapies.

65 posted on 10/17/2005 1:18:20 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: All

Here's the name of an ATTACh therapist in the San Jose area. Does that sound familiar?

Linda Ikeda


66 posted on 10/17/2005 1:18:54 PM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

What a tragic story of the little girl in the library. I am so sorry. I can see why you are a little gun shy.


67 posted on 10/17/2005 1:19:01 PM PDT by Saundra Duffy (Never forget Terri Schindler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan; Rodney King

"I note that the "therapist" has not been named. I'd be interested in knowing that name, so I could do further research."

Ouch. I read the article Rodney King posted re: "Attachment Disorder" and "Attachment Therapy." The fact that the family is operating under a diagnosis that is generally regarded as quackery is a warning bell.


68 posted on 10/17/2005 1:19:49 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse (MORE COWBELL! MORE COWBELL! MORE! MORE! (CLANK-CLANK-CLANK))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
From the long essay I printed:

The American Psychiatric Association has recently (June 2002) issued a Position Statement warning against the use of AT in the treatment of RAD, pointing out that all of forms of coercive restraint are contraindicated. (There have been many other position statements taken, for which see our Opponents page.)

69 posted on 10/17/2005 1:19:59 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

I am absolutely NOT qualified to make any determination about how the kid should be educated. But the education thing seems a giant red herring in this entire discussion.

There was an allegation of child abuse. Child services came to investigate and were denied access, and now the family is in hiding.

What again is the connection to the homeschooling?


70 posted on 10/17/2005 1:21:07 PM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
There is much that I am not at liberty to divulge.

....That's much as I can tell you.

Will, or can? It would be 'can' if you are the lawyer (or a professional counselor providing services) for the father, it would be 'will' if there are facts that are being withheld which are not privileged.

That aside, when folks act like they have something to hide, they shouldn't get upset when folks start suspecting them of hiding something. Folks who act guilty frequently are.

As a specific example, how many folks think the Ramseys were implicated (or at least covering up) in their daughter's death. They could have diverted much of the suspicion if they had fully cooperated with authorities, but instead they lawyered up and got defensive. Were they guilty? I don't know; probably not. Did they do what I would have advised a guilty person to do? Yes.

71 posted on 10/17/2005 1:24:24 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

Thanks for that very cogent piece of info. I had asked this a few times before, but got a "duh" response instead.

I already know I'm not terribly bright, it's why I asked in the first place.


72 posted on 10/17/2005 1:26:19 PM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King

"They are practicing some nutjob therapy on the kid."

This is entirely possible. There are some really bizarre things going on out there with attachment disorder kids. I'm fearful that might be the case here.

If so, I do understand why there's so much secrecy going on around this. Do some research on attachment disorder therapies on Google. It'll scare the stuffing out of you.


73 posted on 10/17/2005 1:29:19 PM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: nyconse
They came they looked asked a few questions and for some references (family). Two weeks later I got a letter that the charges were unfounded.

I suspect that things would not have ended as quickly or as well if you had run them off and hidden the children from them.

74 posted on 10/17/2005 1:30:31 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
There are people who abuse homeschooling. Some people abuse firearms ownership; others operate businesses in an unethical manner. Both the mainstream and alternate media are abused to unjustly slander individuals or willfully misrepresent facts. Some clergy engage in sexual or financial misconduct. The difference between the homeschoolers (or parents generally) and the other groups of people is that in the case of homeschooler or parent, an agency of the state (generally called CPS) can preemptively take custody of the children alleged to have been victimized without the protections of habeas corpus or due process. The gun owner, businessman, member of the media, or clergyman do not lose their property or livelihood, much less their liberty, without a civil or criminal trial.

Parents should receive equal protection of the law as do other classes of people. The CPS agencies should not be able to take children without a court order, and then only after a court of general jurisdiction (and not a so-called family court) has determined that there is immediate danger to the life of the children. (A room smelling of urine hardly qualifies as such.) There should be no anonymous accusers. In all cases, there should be a swift trial, with the defendant afforded adequate legal representation. Additionally, if the parents defeat CPS, the state should reimburse the defendants for court costs at market rates. (I believe this should be the case not only for child custody trials, but all civil and criminal trials. This would be a great way to limit abuses by prosecutors, police, and government agencies. At present, only the wealthy have a level playing field in the courts of this nation.)

The right of the individual to be safe from unwarranted government intrusion in his personal and business matters is fundamental to our form of government. The last century witnessed an enormous erosion of this right. The trend must be reversed.

75 posted on 10/17/2005 1:32:17 PM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: dmz

If you're not familiar with HSLDA, then it can seem confusing. I have some experience with them, being the dad of a homeschooling family.

Have a great day.


76 posted on 10/17/2005 1:32:17 PM PDT by MortMan (Eschew Obfuscation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
Thank you for the post. I will look into that.

The American Psychiatric Association has recently (June 2002) issued a Position Statement warning against the use of AT in the treatment of RAD, pointing out that all of forms of coercive restraint are contraindicated. (There have been many other position statements taken, for which see our Opponents page.)

Considering what the APA is doing to medicate the kids of this country, I am I am just as suspicious of the APA. They represent a group of professionals who get paid by the hour. Cures are not in their interest.

Charities and volunteer groups, on the other hand, have every interest in a cure, because they exist to help as many people as possible with less incentive to drag out the treatment.

77 posted on 10/17/2005 1:33:34 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
It would be 'can' if you are the lawyer (or a professional counselor providing services) for the father, it would be 'will' if there are facts that are being withheld which are not privileged.

If on the other hand, I was told something after the proceedings that was a breach of that confidentiality, if I divulged it to you, then I would be providing evidence of that misdemeanor and implicating the person who told me.

78 posted on 10/17/2005 1:36:24 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

No single therapeutic technique works for all patients or conditions. However, the non-standard therapies for attachment disorder have gotten a lot of attention, due to a couple of deaths resulting from their use.

If this is the sort of therapy this child is receiving, and I suspect it is, after doing a little research on such practices in Santa Clara County, then there is reason for concern by the CPS.

Such "alternative" therapies often involve long periods under "restraints." The rebirthing nonsense is also part of the alternate therapy nonsense used to treat this disorder, as is partial smothering and other unpleasantries.

Since you are restrained from, or are unwilling to discuss any further details regarding this situation, there's little else to discuss, given the facts at hand.

I do know that there is a very active alternative therapy movement in your area. I mentioned one of the therapists above. If this person, or her organization is involved, then the interest of the CPS and unwillingness to allow access to the child by these therapists is not surprising.

Sorry, but there's just too much secrecy here. It raises red flags. It took me less than 30 minutes to track down all this information and link it directly to the area in which you and this family live.

I could go further, but will not.


79 posted on 10/17/2005 1:40:26 PM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
Remember the Chastain's, who smacked their kids around on their bus?

Yeah, Brian and Ruth Christine. 12-1/2 and 7-1/2 years, respectively, but boy did they have a cheerleading section here. And Ted Maher, who had his family checking in here for him. Don't see much of them any more, not that they would do anything like co-opt the forum for their own purposes, no sir ;)

80 posted on 10/17/2005 1:44:31 PM PDT by Senator Bedfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 381-390 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson