Posted on 10/15/2005 2:12:46 PM PDT by FairOpinion
Oh, OK, You win..
Win Nothing with your own brand of silliness, that is..
Who cares what sex you are?
Maybe you're a transexual, a Log Cabin Republican, whatever, who cares? You sluff off any questions that strike to the morality issues as nothing of import which to some here is highly suspect in itself. I hope you can understand that, at least.
You make claims that any who don't vote for this particular prop are so much hog swallop or in bed with the dems, and then expect to be taken as being credible when folks show you things in black and white you can't explain away with anything but, "Oh, thats just nonsense". lol
You feel rejection because you aren't getting hurrahs from the crowd as you "stand your ground" for a Prop you don't even know the details or formulas for.
Who's being silly?
I was on another forum where gender was specified. One poster claimed to be male. She would post things sometimes that made me think she must be a female. I was correct. I don't care what gender you are, you don't post like a man.
So now you are a psychic?
I guess you can't win on the field of debate, facts and logic, so your resort to attempted character insults -- you are acting more and more just the way the Democrats act. Talk like them, vote like them...
There is this saying about a duck, something like if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it ain't a flamingo.
Maybe I don't post like a "redneck" man.
The point is that I don't bring my or anyone else's gender into the discussion, but some people keep referring to people in a certain gender, even when the poster's gender is not specified and the poster is not revealing it.
Some people choose to reveal who they are, some don't. It's everyone's perogative to do either.
Politicking can be a real bitch, huh?
If ya can't take it, then don't dish it out to cover-up your own inadequacy in fathoming issues and why some folks see things diferently than you.
You're OK, just a little confused is all.
For the millionth time.
On the ballot there is no space for explanation of your vote, votes are not categorized by the explanation or reasoning. There are two choices: YES or NO.
It doesn't matter what is your "good intentioned" reason for voting with the Democrats. If you vote NO on the reform propositions, you ARE voting with the Democrats. That's a FACT.
Now those are some pretty high falutin words to be using when speakin of yourself. They are almost as ridiculous as your post the other day referring to yourself as follows:
Virtually ALL Republicans, especially and including REAL CONSERVATIVES, such as Tom McClintock and Ray Haynes, and myself, are strongly supporting Prop. 76, the "live within your means" initiative.I'm still getting over the absurdity of this one. After more than 2 years, I have seen NOTHING conservative about your positions or your opinions. You shamelessly trashed McClintock throughout the recall and into the Prop 57/58 campaign. You think the GLBT legislation that Arnold just passed, giving new "CIVIL RIGHTS" to gays was not "real important." Nor was that anti-gun legislation he signed. Only half of the judges he has appointed were Republican--the rest being Dems and Independents--yet you never have an unkind word to say, only praise. You continue to insult conservatives daily on these threads. You shamelessly shill for non-conservative actions such as Proposition 78. I give you a host of reasons why a Conservative would oppose Proposition 76 (see post #5 above) and you call it "Nonsense" while refusing to provide any specifics or reason, even when prodded. You then try to place anyone who doesn't agree with YOU in the democratic camp. What a joke!
As to the specific definitions, synonyms, etc. I can only say that you might be of a particular PERSUASION. The only BELIEF or CONVICTION I have seen you post is the equivalent of "Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty--Follow the party line or get lost!" Your "OPINION" means little to me as I find it neither "Fair," PERSUASIVE, nor supported, despite the many attempts over the years for you to give any basis for your wild contentions.
As to which "gender" you choose to be--who cares! If you don't like being called "she," we can always refer to you as "it". Unless of course, you choose to just tell everyone. Again--it makes little difference as you have proven yourself irrelevant.
Oh, so it's OK when democrats voted to dump davis and elect arnold but now .. lol
Like I said, you twist and try as hard as you can to sell that which even you don't understand and accept on blind faith alone.
That's how we have ended up even with larger debts than we had before the Gub strolled on the set, promising the world.
And in showbiz words.. "You ain't seen nothing yet!"
The amount of restraint already offered to us as facts in evidence are contained in the first 2 budgets, which the Gub proposed btw, should cause concern if viewed and evaluated in an open manner.
But to you, that doesn't matter. Oh well.
Let the voters decide.
You don't post like any kind of man girlfriend.
As I said, I am not going to confirm or deny your theories. Whatever makes you happy.
I have no confidence in voters. They can be a stupid lot.
It's an educational thing and a real challenge.
I realize the majority of potential voters have been incredibly dumbed down, and are incredibly ill informed for the most part but ,,
The alternative is to do nothing and sink further into the abyss of apathy and nannyism.
Down that path lies ruination.
Oh I agree.
So entertaining you fell asleep, right? LOL.
CA Dem party recommendation on Prop 76: NO
Peace and Freedom Party recommendation on Prop. 76: NO
CA GREEN Party recommendation on Prop. 76: NO
CA Republican Party and Republican Assembly recommendation on Prop. 76: YES
Tom McClintock recommendation on Prop. 76: YES
====
calcowgirl vote on Prop. 77: NO
CA Dem Party recommendation on Prop. 77: NO
ACLU, Peace and Freedom and GREEN party recommendation on Prop. 77: NO
CA Republican Party and Republican Assembly recommendation on Prop. 77: YES
Tom McClintock's recommendation on Prop. 77: YES
====
Summary of Recommendations by parties and organizations on CA special election propositions
The point is well taken.
FairOpinion, Amerigomag, etc are accounts not people. The gender of the user is unknown to FR's servers and should be assumed to be genderless.
While each account requires personal information from one user to be established, FR's policy allows more that one IP to utilize an account and multiple posters may be using the same account at the same time. For example, the Amerigomag account could be several people, each using their own client machines, responding to the same thread.
Tsk tsk, FO.
Now it's character assassintion, is it. You have truly gone off the deep end, how many times is it now? You just don't like any reasonable dissent or discourse.
Your continued attempt to play MS Sweet Polly Purebred are just a continuance of your feeble ability to analyze issues yourself.
Keep it up. The bumps fashioned like this on the threads just leave more dings in your Mercedes Benz mentality and MO here at FR.
I respectfully disagree re: anonymity.
When FReepers go out in public and are photographed, videotaped, etc and then are seen posted on this forum, they are no longer "anonymous".
It is also very clear what and who they stand with and for as well.
If, as you mentioned, multiple folks use a single sign-on, that to me, smacks of a less than acceptable manner of "operating" in a forum such as this that prides itself on openness and tempered debates over current and future events and goings on.
FoR some causes, it may well be to their benefit to pretend to be something other than what they really are to further other other agendas that the bulk of FR folks abhor or do not support, and in so doing, should not enjoy the same luxuries as those who operate openly and willingly, imo.
Just my thoughts on your last remarks.
Only an ignorant person wouldn't realize that there are four(4) choices! Three(3) on each ballot item and a fourth(4th) overall choice.
It's sure nice to see that you're little Metro-Sexual gambit is falling flat and that you're even wearing out your welcome on threads that you start!!! Holy Toledo!!!
NO on 76, State Spending and School Funding Limits.
See Proposition 76 - A Conservative Argument for Voting "NO")
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.