Posted on 10/15/2005 9:24:23 AM PDT by Perdogg
I think your completely right, the 17old-child has been killed not only by this sick-minded photographer but also by her family conditions. therefore, people who marry then divorce should think twice when they have children. they should know that failing to take care of their children may lead them to fall into the hands of human-beast or humanoidlike this photographer. I sadly think they are too many men who will have fun with 17-old-babychild, isn't that the whole society is sick? a lot of stupid and sex-based hollywood movies, a lot of porn everywhere, alchool and all this fashion of fridays nights, isn't that this whole life fashion is just killing children and producing sick-minded people? is the phtographer the killer or our frustrating and materialistic society?
i got really interested in this crime affair. I think, as her mother states, the photographer is responsible for the girl death. The most likely scenario: he took her to a remote place (because he was planning special sexual stuff that cannot be played in his appartment or dorm), ask her to make special things with him, she refused, he insisted, she refused, then he lost his self-control and put her head in a bag and killed her (the bag initially planned for sexual purpose has been shifted for criminal use, the bag was useful to silence her voice because she was very likely shouting and shouting for help). The poor little 17-old-girl-child fought and fought but he could stop her breathing, I am pretty sure he had some bleeding that night, he will never wear the same clothes again. After that, he started quickly thinking (did he call someoneelse for help?), he knows that rapid autopsy will reveal the crime, he nows the car may reveal some traces, he decided to hide the car, he threw her body in some kind of trash, and then come back to continue his dirty and miserable life as nothing happenned. Who knows if the girl was still alive at the time she was fighting for survival (sometimes life becomes so discrete and low under trauma and unexperienced people may think of death), if this sick stoppped his instinct for crime and called emergency probably he could have saved her. All this could have lasted.....10-15 minutes or less. This guy is responsible for a life loss, whatever the price he pays he will not bring her back. One thing is important: how can a guy who kills for the first time drive a dead body, bury it and come back to his place? did he do it for the first time or likely for more, probably the poor police have found more and more bad stuff in his computers, only god knows?
The society produces sick criminals and produces their victims at the same time. Putting this criminal out of circulation will not stop crimes, it will be just like swiping the floor to get the house clean for a day or two. As long as divorces continue, free and cheap sex, porn and porno evryhere, as long as the gap between rich and poor enlarges,people loosing jobs without social security or hope, as long as people do not feel free to talk about their fears and sickness, as long as the moral is declining, they will be more and more behl taylors paying the price for a sick society, just like primitives used to kill people as sacrificies for their gods.
I agree 100%.
That particular trick is known around here as SunRising, and we just lost a teenager to it around here last week. The idea is simply to cur off oxygen which leads to all kinds of hallucinations. When the asphyxiation stops, the choked person gets a huge rush and a "high". The sex is supposed to be incredible while this is happening.
On one hand, I agree with you, but I keep coming back to the Bigger Idiot question ("Who's the bigger idiot...the person who does something stupid and dies, or the friend who survives and goes to prison for it?")
Believe it or not, this fetish is VERY common among kids nowadays. They don't see it as dangerous, and it's a cheap, drug free high for them. This girl, who by all accounts willingly dated and slept with a man who was nearly twice her age AND who was an eager participant in making porno's, was obviously a bit kinkier than most and wasn't exactly what we'd call a "good girl". I personally don't find it hard to believe that her kinkiness might have got her killed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.