Skip to comments.
Open Letter To Harriet Miers (Melanie Morgan Urges Her To Withdraw Her Nomination Alert)
Worldnetdaily.com ^
| 10/14/05
| Melanie Morgan
Posted on 10/13/2005 10:41:48 PM PDT by goldstategop
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-313 next last
To: Howlin
Not true at all. Misinformation
To: Map Kernow; Roberts
I see--"cronyism" in your own business is bad, but "cronyism" on the public's dime is good, is that it?That sound you hear is his point going right over your head.
42
posted on
10/13/2005 11:11:43 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Stellar Dendrite; jstolzen
43
posted on
10/13/2005 11:11:53 PM PDT
by
Do not dub me shapka broham
("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
To: Stellar Dendrite
. . readers who suggested excellent edits to the petition draft . . Not nearly enough.
It's a crude thing, and stands as a mismatched bookend to the Corner's snark on the same shelf.
But the nomination IS a disaster.
44
posted on
10/13/2005 11:11:54 PM PDT
by
alcuin
(Withdraw her. SERIOUSLY!!!)
To: jess35
She's a dimwit, just like all the others, if she doesn't realize that the filibuster is a power grab by the senate to declare for itself who is too extreme to deserve an up or down vote.
She's hurting her own self interests by not recognizing that the filibusters concocted by Kennedy, Schumer, Clinton, et. al. are the core problem.
Maybe she can include some discussion, even a line or two, about the filibusters in her next article. Otherwise, I'll view her with the same disdain as I have for anybody else that ignores the gorilla in the room.
To: polateq2
I have been banned from posting, three times...Not only have I been bounced, but the threads have been pulled AND all my posts removed. How incredibly orwellian, I have been expunged ..... :-) This is absolutely appalling. Are no alternative views to be heard? Fourth times a charm? Get lost, take a hint. You're an IDIOT!
46
posted on
10/13/2005 11:13:08 PM PDT
by
Choose Ye This Day
(Zarqawi has to keep "mopping up the jihadi juice." -- IowaHawk)
To: polateq2
47
posted on
10/13/2005 11:13:13 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: GarySpFc; Howlin
48
posted on
10/13/2005 11:13:30 PM PDT
by
BigSkyFreeper
("Tucker Carlson could reveal himself as a castrated, lesbian, rodeo clown ...wouldn't surprise me")
To: goldstategop
Add conservative Melanie Morgan to the growing list of notable conservatives against the Miers nomination:
Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, Michael Savage, Michelle Malkin, Sen. Rick Santorum, Judge Robert Bork, Rep. Tom Tancredo, George Will, John Podhoretz, Phyllis Schlafly, Paul Weyrich, Grover Norquist, Laura Ingraham, Bill Kristol, Bill Bennett, Jonah Goldberg, John Fund, Charles Krauthammer, David Keene, Sen. Sam Brownback, Robert Novak, David Frum, Peggy Noonan, Gary Bauer, David Limbaugh, Alan Keyes, Thomas Sowell, Mona Charen, Richard Lessner and many, many more.
49
posted on
10/13/2005 11:13:30 PM PDT
by
Spiff
(Robert Bork on the Miers Nomination: "I think it's a disaster on every level.")
To: Map Kernow
I'm not in favor of cronyism at any level. I just find it ironic that Ms. Morgan (who, I'll admit, rubs me the wrong way) is complaining about Bush appointing a "crony". I actually agree with many of her criticisms, but hearing them from her makes me laugh.
I have a feeling you and I may agree on the Miers topic, by the way.
50
posted on
10/13/2005 11:14:33 PM PDT
by
Roberts
To: goldstategop
Interesting article, but why are Melanie Morgan's other candidates for SC nonimation all females? She accuses Meirs of self interest, while simultaneously putting political correctness and feminism ahead of what's best for America.
Surely there are some conservative men out there, sitting on Federal Appeals Courts who also have enormous qualifications for the job; perhaps even better qualifications than the women listed. Why are men being intentionally passed over as candidates for this crucial position regarding the future direction of America? And why doesn't anybody care?
51
posted on
10/13/2005 11:14:37 PM PDT
by
TheCrusader
("The frenzy of the Mohammedans has devastated the churches of God" -Pope Urban II, 1097AD)
To: polateq2; Jim Robinson
given that your normal users should be given the opportunity to realise how malignant is the mind control on this siteYou obviously haven't been reading FR this week, bud.
52
posted on
10/13/2005 11:14:47 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Roberts
Melanie is on vacation til monday's show.
.. and we should at least keep in mind, Miers is no Ruth Bader Ginsburg , she has never worked for the ACLU, much less, led it.
I know it is of little consolation too many, but keep in mind there will likely be other openings soon enough on the court. Miers is truly a faith-based appointment.
53
posted on
10/13/2005 11:16:40 PM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: MJY1288
Back on May 29th he wrote a piece that said that Harriet Miers is on the short list of potential picks for the SCOTUS and had no objections then and even said that she is picked, you heard it hear first. So we now know that Frum was for Harriet Miers before he was against herBack up your Clintonesque smear with a link. Reproduce Frum's exact language here and produce a link. Or go do it flying.
54
posted on
10/13/2005 11:16:45 PM PDT
by
Map Kernow
("I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing" ---Thomas Jefferson)
To: TheCrusader
I agree with you - gender shouldn't matter. But let's face it - once they picked a woman, its all but politically impossible to name any one but a woman. I don't like quota politics but what can one do? sigh>
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
55
posted on
10/13/2005 11:16:46 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Roberts
56
posted on
10/13/2005 11:17:18 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
(If you're not willing to give Harriett Miers a hearing, I don't give a damn what you think.)
To: goldstategop
I wonder what would have happened to this country if someone had written a letter like this to Scalia or Thomas?
57
posted on
10/13/2005 11:17:28 PM PDT
by
McGavin999
(We're a First World Country with a Third World Press (Except for Hume & Garrett ))
To: GarySpFc
Thomas was a very tepid endorsement. If you can even call it an endorsement.
Of course, your'e also forgetting in the 'against' column, Rush Limbaugh, David Limbaugh, Mark Steyn, Peggy Noonan, John Fund, almost all of national review online, and many more.
To: NormsRevenge
Again, I have nothing against Ms. Miers personally, and accept that she might vote entirely the way I would hope. And I wouldn't dream of comparing her to Ginsburg (a true politician on the Court if ever there was one).
59
posted on
10/13/2005 11:19:22 PM PDT
by
Roberts
To: Roberts
I have a feeling you and I may agree on the Miers topic, by the way.Glad if we do. I'm not in favor of cronyism even in private business, because it's usually bad for business. But a private owner has a right to run his business into the ground if he wants to---the President has no right to foist a unqualified crony on the Republic's highest court.
60
posted on
10/13/2005 11:19:54 PM PDT
by
Map Kernow
("I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing" ---Thomas Jefferson)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-313 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson