Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Open Letter To Harriet Miers (Melanie Morgan Urges Her To Withdraw Her Nomination Alert)
Worldnetdaily.com ^ | 10/14/05 | Melanie Morgan

Posted on 10/13/2005 10:41:48 PM PDT by goldstategop

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-313 next last
To: Howlin

Not true at all. Misinformation


41 posted on 10/13/2005 11:11:27 PM PDT by ALWAYSWELDING
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Map Kernow; Roberts
I see--"cronyism" in your own business is bad, but "cronyism" on the public's dime is good, is that it?

That sound you hear is his point going right over your head.

42 posted on 10/13/2005 11:11:43 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite; jstolzen

http://forum.protestwarrior.com/viewtopic.php?t=108676&sid=144e5681b2cccb469a85003a8753e919


43 posted on 10/13/2005 11:11:53 PM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite
. . readers who suggested excellent edits to the petition draft . .

Not nearly enough.

It's a crude thing, and stands as a mismatched bookend to the Corner's snark on the same shelf.

But the nomination IS a disaster.

44 posted on 10/13/2005 11:11:54 PM PDT by alcuin (Withdraw her. SERIOUSLY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jess35

She's a dimwit, just like all the others, if she doesn't realize that the filibuster is a power grab by the senate to declare for itself who is too extreme to deserve an up or down vote.

She's hurting her own self interests by not recognizing that the filibusters concocted by Kennedy, Schumer, Clinton, et. al. are the core problem.

Maybe she can include some discussion, even a line or two, about the filibusters in her next article. Otherwise, I'll view her with the same disdain as I have for anybody else that ignores the gorilla in the room.


45 posted on 10/13/2005 11:12:30 PM PDT by Kryptonite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: polateq2
I have been banned from posting, three times...Not only have I been bounced, but the threads have been pulled AND all my posts removed. How incredibly orwellian, I have been expunged ..... :-) This is absolutely appalling. Are no alternative views to be heard? Fourth times a charm? Get lost, take a hint. You're an IDIOT!
46 posted on 10/13/2005 11:13:08 PM PDT by Choose Ye This Day (Zarqawi has to keep "mopping up the jihadi juice." -- IowaHawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: polateq2

47 posted on 10/13/2005 11:13:13 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc; Howlin
The last i heard David Frum changed his position to support Miers.

I don't think so.

48 posted on 10/13/2005 11:13:30 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper ("Tucker Carlson could reveal himself as a castrated, lesbian, rodeo clown ...wouldn't surprise me")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Add conservative Melanie Morgan to the growing list of notable conservatives against the Miers nomination:

Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, Michael Savage, Michelle Malkin, Sen. Rick Santorum, Judge Robert Bork, Rep. Tom Tancredo, George Will, John Podhoretz, Phyllis Schlafly, Paul Weyrich, Grover Norquist, Laura Ingraham, Bill Kristol, Bill Bennett, Jonah Goldberg, John Fund, Charles Krauthammer, David Keene, Sen. Sam Brownback, Robert Novak, David Frum, Peggy Noonan, Gary Bauer, David Limbaugh, Alan Keyes, Thomas Sowell, Mona Charen, Richard Lessner and many, many more.

49 posted on 10/13/2005 11:13:30 PM PDT by Spiff (Robert Bork on the Miers Nomination: "I think it's a disaster on every level.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Map Kernow

I'm not in favor of cronyism at any level. I just find it ironic that Ms. Morgan (who, I'll admit, rubs me the wrong way) is complaining about Bush appointing a "crony". I actually agree with many of her criticisms, but hearing them from her makes me laugh.

I have a feeling you and I may agree on the Miers topic, by the way.


50 posted on 10/13/2005 11:14:33 PM PDT by Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Interesting article, but why are Melanie Morgan's other candidates for SC nonimation all females? She accuses Meirs of self interest, while simultaneously putting political correctness and feminism ahead of what's best for America.

Surely there are some conservative men out there, sitting on Federal Appeals Courts who also have enormous qualifications for the job; perhaps even better qualifications than the women listed. Why are men being intentionally passed over as candidates for this crucial position regarding the future direction of America? And why doesn't anybody care?

51 posted on 10/13/2005 11:14:37 PM PDT by TheCrusader ("The frenzy of the Mohammedans has devastated the churches of God" -Pope Urban II, 1097AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: polateq2; Jim Robinson
given that your normal users should be given the opportunity to realise how malignant is the mind control on this site

You obviously haven't been reading FR this week, bud.

52 posted on 10/13/2005 11:14:47 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Roberts

Melanie is on vacation til monday's show.

.. and we should at least keep in mind, Miers is no Ruth Bader Ginsburg , she has never worked for the ACLU, much less, led it.

I know it is of little consolation too many, but keep in mind there will likely be other openings soon enough on the court. Miers is truly a faith-based appointment.


53 posted on 10/13/2005 11:16:40 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
Back on May 29th he wrote a piece that said that Harriet Miers is on the short list of potential picks for the SCOTUS and had no objections then and even said that she is picked, you heard it hear first. So we now know that Frum was for Harriet Miers before he was against her

Back up your Clintonesque smear with a link. Reproduce Frum's exact language here and produce a link. Or go do it flying.

54 posted on 10/13/2005 11:16:45 PM PDT by Map Kernow ("I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing" ---Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TheCrusader
I agree with you - gender shouldn't matter. But let's face it - once they picked a woman, its all but politically impossible to name any one but a woman. I don't like quota politics but what can one do? sigh>

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
55 posted on 10/13/2005 11:16:46 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Roberts
Sackings are becoming routine at ABC Radio, where conservative morning show host Melanie Morgan has been yanked from San Francisco's KSFO-AM without warning.
56 posted on 10/13/2005 11:17:18 PM PDT by sinkspur (If you're not willing to give Harriett Miers a hearing, I don't give a damn what you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

I wonder what would have happened to this country if someone had written a letter like this to Scalia or Thomas?


57 posted on 10/13/2005 11:17:28 PM PDT by McGavin999 (We're a First World Country with a Third World Press (Except for Hume & Garrett ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc

Thomas was a very tepid endorsement. If you can even call it an endorsement.

Of course, your'e also forgetting in the 'against' column, Rush Limbaugh, David Limbaugh, Mark Steyn, Peggy Noonan, John Fund, almost all of national review online, and many more.


58 posted on 10/13/2005 11:19:06 PM PDT by flashbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Again, I have nothing against Ms. Miers personally, and accept that she might vote entirely the way I would hope. And I wouldn't dream of comparing her to Ginsburg (a true politician on the Court if ever there was one).


59 posted on 10/13/2005 11:19:22 PM PDT by Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Roberts
I have a feeling you and I may agree on the Miers topic, by the way.

Glad if we do. I'm not in favor of cronyism even in private business, because it's usually bad for business. But a private owner has a right to run his business into the ground if he wants to---the President has no right to foist a unqualified crony on the Republic's highest court.

60 posted on 10/13/2005 11:19:54 PM PDT by Map Kernow ("I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing" ---Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-313 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson