Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President ought to take mulligan on Miers pick
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution ^ | 10/12/05 | Bob Barr

Posted on 10/13/2005 5:31:15 PM PDT by NapkinUser

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

1 posted on 10/13/2005 5:31:18 PM PDT by NapkinUser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

Another worthless opinion from one of the more outspoken new members of the ACLU. Some will go a long way to get noticed, especially if they used to get more attention.


2 posted on 10/13/2005 5:36:27 PM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Conservatives don't want judicial "litmus tests", UNLESS they supply the test that is))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: NapkinUser
Republicans on the Senate Judiciary committee release statements regarding the hearings..

Mr. Sessions (R)Mr. Sessions affirmative…. “My conversations with Harriet Miers indicate that she is a first-rate lawyer and a fine person. Her legal skills are proven and her reputation throughout the legal community is excellent. It is not necessary that she have previous experience as a judge in order to serve on the Supreme Court. It’s perfectly acceptable to nominate outstanding lawyers to that position. I look forward to the confirmation process and to learning more about her judicial philosophy.”

Mr. Cornyn (R) Mr Cornyn…affirmative "The President has announced his nominee to replace Justice Sandra Day O'Connor on the Supreme Court of the United States: Harriet Miers, currently serving as White House Counsel. As he did with Judge John G. Roberts, Jr., the President has chosen an outstanding nominee for our nation's highest court. The Senate should consider this nomination in both a thorough and expedient manner.

"Harriet Miers is a brilliant legal mind. She is a woman of outstanding character who clearly understands what it means to follow the law. She is deeply committed to public service, and has a distinguished history of professional achievement. It is clear that her past experiences have well prepared her for the honor of serving our country as a Supreme Court Justice. I strongly support her nomination.

"It is important that we put aside partisanship, and that the Senate fulfill its constitutional responsibility of advice and consent. This fine nominee must be treated with civility and respect, not as a political pawn. I hope that we in the Senate can move forward in a manner worthy of the American people."

Mr. Coburn (R) Mr.Coburn..affirmative. “Harriet Miers deserves a fair and thorough hearing and confirmation process. I look forward to learning more about her qualifications and judicial philosophy in the coming days,” Dr. Coburn said, adding that he plans to meet with Miers this week.”

.

4 posted on 10/13/2005 5:37:50 PM PDT by Earthdweller (Republicans should give Miers a fair vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
You obviously have picked her because she believes the sun rises and sets around you.

Yea we all know Bush is surrounded with only those who agree with him, oh, wait a minute, that was Clintoon, not Bush.

WHAT CRAP

5 posted on 10/13/2005 5:38:53 PM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Conservatives don't want judicial "litmus tests", UNLESS they supply the test that is))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

Yep, Bob Barr..closet DU'er from waaaay back! LOL

Or sexist, he might be elitist...doesn't mean he's wrong.


6 posted on 10/13/2005 5:38:59 PM PDT by trubluolyguy (Dude seriously, if you don't quit being so poor I'm gonna start huckin' rocks at ya!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Made in USA
If not, then what have we to lose?

If Miers becomes the swing vote that upholds all the past activist liberal rulings, the GOP big tent will implode.

7 posted on 10/13/2005 5:39:37 PM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Made in USA

If not, then what have we to lose?




The Senate in '06. But what the heck, the Republocrats aren't using it anyway.


8 posted on 10/13/2005 5:40:28 PM PDT by trubluolyguy (Dude seriously, if you don't quit being so poor I'm gonna start huckin' rocks at ya!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

The Atlanta Urinal-Constipation remains another useless liberal paper.


9 posted on 10/13/2005 5:42:14 PM PDT by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

Great day to sign up. You'll fit right in with the Bush bashers.


10 posted on 10/13/2005 5:43:04 PM PDT by Normal4me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller

Your either with us or against us.

Looks like the against are stacking up. Oh Well, those of us who are loyal and trust W will remain to the end.

All others can take the Coulter train to nowhere.


11 posted on 10/13/2005 5:44:52 PM PDT by JFC (Marty MOOSE!!!!! I LOVE !!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: caisson71

I call it the fishwrap.


12 posted on 10/13/2005 5:45:22 PM PDT by NapkinUser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
Miers is really the single most qualified

This idea that the job ought to go to the most qualified, or the most qualified qualified, is simply a mechanistic idea, and totally fallacious if the most qualified also happens to be, e.g., a Marxist. The nominee may have been selected, at least partly, on another basis besides a pageful of words.

13 posted on 10/13/2005 5:46:05 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

Like I should pay attention to the ACLU. Dont think so.


14 posted on 10/13/2005 5:46:35 PM PDT by cksharks (ew prayers for them because they will need it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
We won't even demand that you admit you made a mistake.

We'll try very hard to remember who you were.

15 posted on 10/13/2005 5:48:10 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (Lashed to the USS George W. Bush: "Damn the Torpedos, Full Miers Ahead!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

If Miers becomes the swing vote that upholds all the past activist liberal rulings, the GOP big tent will implode.
-----
Agreed - she and Roberts should work full force to turn over that ruling -- VERY BAD and a horrible anti-Constitutional precedent.


16 posted on 10/13/2005 5:49:21 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mister Baredog

Has Bob Barr joined the ACLU?


17 posted on 10/13/2005 5:53:27 PM PDT by ChessExpert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

Hey Bob Barr...STFU and go back to the anti-Christian ACLU.


18 posted on 10/13/2005 5:53:32 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

Imust disagree with you. Bob Barr was a good man whosupported teh Consttituion. Moreover, he was right on he money with the miers thing. There is a time to hold and a time to fold.

Time to fold and bring out a real originalist like Brown or Luttig.


19 posted on 10/13/2005 6:13:13 PM PDT by GladesGuru ("In a society predicated upon liberty, it is essential to examine principles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JFC
Right - if GWB had appointed a KNOWN Conservative, the rats would have gone ape sKerry.

Instead, he has given them still another stealth candidate and confounded everybody.

I honestly do not believe that we will be disappointed when Justice Miers is confirmed.

Her brother is my physician, and if she is half as Conservative as he is, GWB has hit still another grand slammer.

20 posted on 10/13/2005 6:13:54 PM PDT by oldtimer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson