Posted on 10/09/2005 3:28:25 PM PDT by Pukin Dog
A kiss?
Your analysis is spot on. Bullseye. There are traitors in the Senate.
Frist is not one of them. He has a serious conservative history and voting record, and he would never have voted against a Bush nominee.
The traitors in the Senate are what made his job thankless. When you've only got a 5 (6?) vote lead and more than 6 traitors, then you're gonna hafta make some trades.
This is the best I have read so far. I'm in.
I didn't know you were rooting for the Yankees, LOL!
Interesting perspective.
P.S. I read your posting history before I replied to your initial inquiry, because the inquiry was cryptic. Based on the contents of your posts, I believe you and I have similar views of the proper role of government, voters, etc.
In other words, we're more likely allies than adversaries, despite the tone of our written exchange.
...love those Halos.
OK, LOL!
Yes, but who needs 30 years of Yanakee loyalty when I can make a wager like that.
'night Victoria...
Cya tomorrow.
Thank you for this post, you have put into words what I have been thinking since Meirs was nominated. If others can't see it this way, it is not our fault. At least no one can call you a Bushbot.
When did you see Miers hardware?
Sir, thank you so much for taking the time to give me your reasoned, thoughtful, and very smart, response. It adds another level of much appreciated perspective.
I wish you...Safe Travel.
They are all always looking to their re-election! That becomes job 1 as they sit in that big comfy desk chair. They need a shot of testosterone. Even the girls.
Well gee, I am supposed to research you before I respond - you elitists are sooo much better than the politicians. It has been such a wasted conversation - it started with you denegrading the GOP over money collection and wound up with you asking me to research you - at some point I expected a substant comment. Good night.
Out-classes? Please, don't use the word "class" in the same sentence with the word "democrat". They are mutually exclusive.
When you are not held to the truth you can say anything you like. The democrats have proven that over time. The leadership stinks on ice.
Well please disreguard my last post then, but your reticence to state your postion just lit off all that I find wrong with the consevative movement.
If anyone wishes to question this IMPORTANT point....we did it in Oklahoma (against the GOP endorsed candidates), why can't you?
No. That would be unreasonable. I suggestede d you research me because you asked about me.
you elitists are sooo much better than the politicians.
Most politicians are elitists, IMO. I may or may not be an elitist from your point of view. My self-opinion is that I don't think I am priviledged over you or anybody else.
It has been such a wasted conversation - it started with you denegrading the GOP over money collection
Oh. Oops. Wasted conversation. it started with your "What are you trying to say here? I am a Republican. what the hay are you?"
If you represent the GOP, then you have my criticsim and sugestions, but not my money. And a nifty thing is, I told you what I expected so you could get my money. That ball is in the GOP's court.
at some point I expected a substant comment. Good night.
If you ask a more narrow and direct question, I am apt to provide a substantive comment. I'm not a prolific poster, so slogging through my history will easily yield substance.
Sleep tight.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.