Skip to comments.
Bork calls Miers nomination a disaster
MSNBC ^
| October 7, 2005
| Tucker Carlson
Posted on 10/08/2005 6:01:01 PM PDT by arnoldpalmerfan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-184 next last
Robert Bork is right on target with his comments about Harriet Miers.
To: arnoldpalmerfan
Judge Bork knows what he is talking about. Ms. Miers' nomination needs to go down.
2
posted on
10/08/2005 6:04:04 PM PDT
by
tdewey10
(Extremely disappointed in the Miers nomination.)
To: tdewey10
Is this one gonna get posted 27 times like the other anti-mier articles?
3
posted on
10/08/2005 6:05:24 PM PDT
by
A.Hun
(The supreme irony of life is that no one gets out of it alive. R. Heinlein)
To: arnoldpalmerfan
The Honorable Robert H. Bork, RINO
4
posted on
10/08/2005 6:05:24 PM PDT
by
msnimje
(If you suspect this post might need a sarcasm tag..... it does!)
To: arnoldpalmerfan
5
posted on
10/08/2005 6:05:35 PM PDT
by
Mr. Mojo
To: arnoldpalmerfan
Robert Bork is right on target with his comments about Harriet Miers. Robert Bork has been an angry old grump for a number of years. There's not much dignity or gravitas in him just plenty of ego.
6
posted on
10/08/2005 6:07:19 PM PDT
by
bkepley
To: arnoldpalmerfan
7
posted on
10/08/2005 6:07:34 PM PDT
by
durasell
To: arnoldpalmerfan
Robert Bork reads the second amendment and sees no indivdual RTKABA. Harriet Miers reads the same text and sees an individual RTKABA.
Given a choice between the two I choose Miers and I do it without hesitation no matter what they think on any other issue. The RTKABA is the right that guarantees all other rights, period.
8
posted on
10/08/2005 6:08:01 PM PDT
by
jwalsh07
To: arnoldpalmerfan
Amen, Judge Bork.
Now, watch for the stampede of the Bushbots, screaming how DARE you criticise W, for rewarding a loyal buddy with a SCOTUS seat!
9
posted on
10/08/2005 6:08:57 PM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
To: arnoldpalmerfan
because she has "no experience with constitutional law whatever". But at the level of the supreme court, this seldom matters. Who's going to over rule her?
I cant say the "expierence" of all the other judges has done us any good over the years.
10
posted on
10/08/2005 6:09:55 PM PDT
by
konaice
To: arnoldpalmerfan
The first few times I read this article at this forum were plenty. The search function does work, but not unless it's used.
11
posted on
10/08/2005 6:10:37 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: bkepley
Robert Bork has been an angry old grump for a number of years. There's not much dignity or gravitas in him just plenty of ego.
------
Sour grapes. Bork should maintain his dignity by just being a quiet spectator. It would do wonders for the situation and him.
12
posted on
10/08/2005 6:11:18 PM PDT
by
EagleUSA
To: Travis McGee
I admire Bork and my first reaction to Harriet was "WTF?". Im starting to think that was W's intention all along. While the MSM is lapping up the anger on the right they arent giving much press to the usual suspects on the left. She'll be confirmed without too much fuss and the SCOTUS will have a "Born Again" justice. I can live with that.
To: EagleUSA
Bork is a miserable failure.
14
posted on
10/08/2005 6:12:44 PM PDT
by
nwrep
To: arnoldpalmerfan; tdewey10
Bork is way, way over the top. True, Miers was not the perfect choice, but she's not unqualified. And leading a law firm of 400 in a fast-gwowing state is not something a moron could do successfully. As for her conservativism or lack of, no one can say that she's not an originalists or Constitutionalist. She may turn out to be an outstanding justice, and her critics will have to eat huge portions of crow.
Bush really had no good options. With Senate 'Rats threatening filibuster and RINO's wobbling, Bush simply made the best of a bad situation.
15
posted on
10/08/2005 6:12:53 PM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(Jeanine Pirro for Senate, Hillary Clinton for Weight Watchers Spokeswoman)
To: msnimje
16
posted on
10/08/2005 6:13:15 PM PDT
by
Sometimes A River
(Serving on a Meals-on-Wheels program is NOT a qualification for a SC nominee. Call your Senators!)
To: bkepley
Since he's an angry old grump, that makes himwrong, or does it make him a DU'er?
17
posted on
10/08/2005 6:14:05 PM PDT
by
Sometimes A River
(Serving on a Meals-on-Wheels program is NOT a qualification for a SC nominee. Call your Senators!)
To: arnoldpalmerfan
I cant help wondering how much of the opposition to Ms Meirs stems from the lack of a "bleeding from the eyeballs" opposition from the liberal left. And I cant help but worry that the left, knowing they cannot defeat the candidate, are using a tepid, easily reversible, mild, nonsupport support to cause the more excitable elements of the right to defeat this person.
In other words, are we being played for a fool by Ted and little Dickie Durbin{child Senator}??
18
posted on
10/08/2005 6:14:22 PM PDT
by
MCCRon58
(Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will positively destroy my sensitive inner child.)
To: Travis McGee
"Bushbots."
That's rather cute. But the idiot "Bushbots" somehow knew that Roberts was a good candidate, didn't they? And the little bots knew that nominating someone without a paper trail was a good idea, too. And you know what? The Bushbots nailed it and the nomination.
But now the little bots have it all wrong, huh?
To: Acts 2:38
Since he's an angry old grump, that makes himwrong, or does it make him a DU'er? Not wrong, just not a reliable witness.
20
posted on
10/08/2005 6:17:44 PM PDT
by
bkepley
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-184 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson