Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bork calls Miers nomination a disaster
MSNBC ^ | October 7, 2005 | Tucker Carlson

Posted on 10/08/2005 6:01:01 PM PDT by arnoldpalmerfan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-184 next last
Robert Bork is right on target with his comments about Harriet Miers.
1 posted on 10/08/2005 6:01:02 PM PDT by arnoldpalmerfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: arnoldpalmerfan

Judge Bork knows what he is talking about. Ms. Miers' nomination needs to go down.


2 posted on 10/08/2005 6:04:04 PM PDT by tdewey10 (Extremely disappointed in the Miers nomination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tdewey10

Is this one gonna get posted 27 times like the other anti-mier articles?


3 posted on 10/08/2005 6:05:24 PM PDT by A.Hun (The supreme irony of life is that no one gets out of it alive. R. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: arnoldpalmerfan
The Honorable Robert H. Bork, RINO
4 posted on 10/08/2005 6:05:24 PM PDT by msnimje (If you suspect this post might need a sarcasm tag..... it does!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arnoldpalmerfan
Bork's confirmation would've been a disaster:

Borking the 2nd Amendment

5 posted on 10/08/2005 6:05:35 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arnoldpalmerfan
Robert Bork is right on target with his comments about Harriet Miers.

Robert Bork has been an angry old grump for a number of years. There's not much dignity or gravitas in him just plenty of ego.

6 posted on 10/08/2005 6:07:19 PM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arnoldpalmerfan

Wow, Bork, Borked her


7 posted on 10/08/2005 6:07:34 PM PDT by durasell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arnoldpalmerfan
Robert Bork reads the second amendment and sees no indivdual RTKABA. Harriet Miers reads the same text and sees an individual RTKABA.

Given a choice between the two I choose Miers and I do it without hesitation no matter what they think on any other issue. The RTKABA is the right that guarantees all other rights, period.

8 posted on 10/08/2005 6:08:01 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arnoldpalmerfan

Amen, Judge Bork.

Now, watch for the stampede of the Bushbots, screaming how DARE you criticise W, for rewarding a loyal buddy with a SCOTUS seat!


9 posted on 10/08/2005 6:08:57 PM PDT by Travis McGee (--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arnoldpalmerfan
because she has "no experience with constitutional law whatever".

But at the level of the supreme court, this seldom matters. Who's going to over rule her?

I cant say the "expierence" of all the other judges has done us any good over the years.

10 posted on 10/08/2005 6:09:55 PM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arnoldpalmerfan

The first few times I read this article at this forum were plenty. The search function does work, but not unless it's used.


11 posted on 10/08/2005 6:10:37 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkepley

Robert Bork has been an angry old grump for a number of years. There's not much dignity or gravitas in him just plenty of ego.
------
Sour grapes. Bork should maintain his dignity by just being a quiet spectator. It would do wonders for the situation and him.


12 posted on 10/08/2005 6:11:18 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

I admire Bork and my first reaction to Harriet was "WTF?". Im starting to think that was W's intention all along. While the MSM is lapping up the anger on the right they arent giving much press to the usual suspects on the left. She'll be confirmed without too much fuss and the SCOTUS will have a "Born Again" justice. I can live with that.


13 posted on 10/08/2005 6:12:30 PM PDT by DogBarkTree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Bork is a miserable failure.


14 posted on 10/08/2005 6:12:44 PM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: arnoldpalmerfan; tdewey10

Bork is way, way over the top. True, Miers was not the perfect choice, but she's not unqualified. And leading a law firm of 400 in a fast-gwowing state is not something a moron could do successfully. As for her conservativism or lack of, no one can say that she's not an originalists or Constitutionalist. She may turn out to be an outstanding justice, and her critics will have to eat huge portions of crow.

Bush really had no good options. With Senate 'Rats threatening filibuster and RINO's wobbling, Bush simply made the best of a bad situation.


15 posted on 10/08/2005 6:12:53 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Jeanine Pirro for Senate, Hillary Clinton for Weight Watchers Spokeswoman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

I love sarcasm.


16 posted on 10/08/2005 6:13:15 PM PDT by Sometimes A River (Serving on a Meals-on-Wheels program is NOT a qualification for a SC nominee. Call your Senators!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bkepley

Since he's an angry old grump, that makes himwrong, or does it make him a DU'er?


17 posted on 10/08/2005 6:14:05 PM PDT by Sometimes A River (Serving on a Meals-on-Wheels program is NOT a qualification for a SC nominee. Call your Senators!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: arnoldpalmerfan
I cant help wondering how much of the opposition to Ms Meirs stems from the lack of a "bleeding from the eyeballs" opposition from the liberal left. And I cant help but worry that the left, knowing they cannot defeat the candidate, are using a tepid, easily reversible, mild, nonsupport support to cause the more excitable elements of the right to defeat this person.

In other words, are we being played for a fool by Ted and little Dickie Durbin{child Senator}??
18 posted on 10/08/2005 6:14:22 PM PDT by MCCRon58 (Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will positively destroy my sensitive inner child.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
"Bushbots."

That's rather cute. But the idiot "Bushbots" somehow knew that Roberts was a good candidate, didn't they? And the little bots knew that nominating someone without a paper trail was a good idea, too. And you know what? The Bushbots nailed it and the nomination.

But now the little bots have it all wrong, huh?

19 posted on 10/08/2005 6:17:34 PM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Acts 2:38
Since he's an angry old grump, that makes himwrong, or does it make him a DU'er?

Not wrong, just not a reliable witness.

20 posted on 10/08/2005 6:17:44 PM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-184 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson