Posted on 10/08/2005 6:14:31 AM PDT by gobucks
The other was the whole Democrats for Life movement. I don't know how big or little it is ... but heck, its very existence is a good, really good sign. And from the pure leftist point of view, he does nail exactly how inconsistent today's demonrats are..
thanks for the inspiriation to hunt this down Crackingham...
Thanks for posting. To be fair, America was not founded based on the Christian faith. It was founded on the basis of deism, which is far less denomination specific. But it was also founded based on precepts which are fundamentally Judeo-Christian, and from its start has been influenced more by Judeo-Christianity, especially protestant and particularly evangelical Christianity, than by most other influences.
Letters from and to the founding fathers reinforce this perspective. While they themselves are deist, and founding this new republic to be so, they are also clearly building on a base whose foundation was set by Judeo-Christianity. Moreover, those who ignore the fact that America has been heavily protestant throughout most of its history (though there has been almost from the start a rather large Catholic minority, and a very small, but very significant Jewish minority), are missing key facts.
Also, the article's points about abortion from a leftist perspective are valid. It's amazing these don't get trotted outmore. Moreover, as you said, they do nail how inconsistent today's Democrats are.
Actually, the average Democrat seen on TV and in Congress are the pro-abortionists' best arguments to justify abortion on demand.
Here's a link explaining it. It's usually taken out of context by those hostile to Christianity.
The US government was negotiting with Muslim pirates and Muslim run governments of North Africa who had routinely kidnapped Americans, mostly off of Libya.
This diplomatic rhetoric (ie: Lie) was told to the Muslims to make them easier to deal with.
If they thought that America were an officially Christian nation (just 300 years after being kicked out of Spain by force by 'officially' Christian Spain no less), they would have just killed the hostages, or certainly have just kept kidnapping them and kept demanding ransom.
They weren't opposed to abortions, only to letting non-physicians do them.
Oh, the left does a lot of contradictory stuff nowadays.
They extoll the first amendmendment while promoting McCain-Feingold.
And they praise democracy while actively undermining confidence in elections when they lose.
And they support freedom for the oppressed of the world until the United States actually does something to remove despots.
And that's just for starters.
If this kind of thinking should ever become prevalent in the Democratic party, it might just make me think about changing.
Well well well ... the legacy of an grand master evolutionist extends to find historical documents, and posting them, which refutes the notion that America has primarily Christian roots.
This is quite revealing. Stephen would be proud.
PH, in the spirit of completeness, and Freeper good will (which I am too short of at times, but I just had good coffee and good breakfast ... pork suasage w/ eggs), I really think you should add this to your list of links.
Many thanks for these links....
Abortion is more a symptom of other social ills. A woman who would kill her own sprout is a cold individual, indeed (with extremely rare exceptions, of course). The coldness is the problem.
from the link:
"The Treaty was broken in 1801 by the Pasha of Tripoli and renegotiated in 1805 after the First Barbary War, at which time Article 11 was removed."
Article 11 was removed? Why, that wasn't on SJG's list of links as I recall... interesting omission.
I just posted the link in response to your statement:
"one is this Tripoli reference. I had never heard of it. "
That's quite a leap to assume I'm an 'evolutionist'.
(pssst! I'm not)
While I believe it shouldn't be totally secular - the secular side of the pro-life must be strengthened - people are put off by the life movement because they see it as being too religious, and indeed many people have difficulty accepting that you don't need to religious at all to believe that abortion is murder!
:-)
I agree. But the solution to that problem? Coldness in a woman is not by any means a natural feature of her. She is born warm. She is made cold.
And without exception, the origin of that coldness is her biological Dad.
If a spiritual Dad doesn't come along to fix the mess, abortion, along w/ a lot of other maladies will appear in her. The nonsense grows and grows no different than when you unplug the fridge and leave it sit for a few weeks.
This is the field absent/neglectful fathers sow ... mold fields....
I know a Dad who is full aware of this. He takes his 12 year old daughter out on date nights routinely. She is not cold - she is very warm ... and I fully expect that she will remain so long after her Dad dies. Even more so, I would be amazed if she ever married a man who would neglect her such that coldness would grow within her....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.