Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ROBERT BORK CALLS MIERS NOMINATION "A DISASTER"
Tucker Carlson ^ | October 5, 2005 | Press Release

Posted on 10/07/2005 3:50:01 PM PDT by Sam Hill

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 941-943 next last
To: sinkspur
Well, you call it what you want, Map. It smells like snootiness and a tier-one-law-school-exclusiveness that sucks to this Texan.

How come we support Priscialla Owen, who went to Baylor?

481 posted on 10/07/2005 7:35:53 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 454 | View Replies]

To: Torie
I eagerly await the Miers hearings. If she does not measure up to my standards of acumen, I will be pleased as punch to oppose her. That will influence exactly zero senate votes. And so it goes.

Assuming of course, that anyone asks her difficult questions and she answers them.

482 posted on 10/07/2005 7:37:09 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies]

To: msnimje
If Harriet Miers had the exact same education she has now but spent 10 years teaching Constitutional law at Topeka College she would be more qualified to sit on the Supreme court.

Says you.

Some of us respectfully disagree.

483 posted on 10/07/2005 7:37:32 PM PDT by sinkspur (American Staffordshire Terriers should be bred out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 468 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

Cyn Good to see a up state New Yorker here.


484 posted on 10/07/2005 7:37:51 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 477 | View Replies]

To: wolf24

I'm getting the feeling some of these characters are posting from the White House basement.


485 posted on 10/07/2005 7:38:24 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

Who is on the rest of her list, and why?


486 posted on 10/07/2005 7:38:37 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 470 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts

You want to know for sure??? Wait til midnight when their shift is over.


487 posted on 10/07/2005 7:39:46 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 485 | View Replies]

To: Map Kernow
The founding fathers never mentioned that only elitists need apply -- various prominant critics of Miers have.

Absolute, scurrilous nonsense. Demanding qualifications is not the same as elitism. Quit the phoney "dumbed down" posturing, Bush hacks. The GOP base isn't going to let you talk to them as if they were a bunch of uneducated envious dolts---those type of people are Democrats for the most part anyway.

Critics of Miers, some prominent have listed as a disqualification that she went to SMU. That's elitism.

None of our found fathers went to an elite law school.

BTW, not knowing a lot about Miers I've yet to endorse her.

Your remark about being me being a "hack" makes you a idiot.

You're defense of elitism makes you a dunce.

488 posted on 10/07/2005 7:39:57 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies]

To: wolf24

And I would note that they are using the exact same tactics as the Clinton crowd. Personal attacks against anyone who dares criticize the president.


489 posted on 10/07/2005 7:40:04 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King

Ya, the questions of Roberts were not too swift in general. The Judiciary Committee is not overloaded with rocket scientists.


490 posted on 10/07/2005 7:40:22 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 482 | View Replies]

To: cynicom

Isn't there a replacement crew that will relieve them? :-)


491 posted on 10/07/2005 7:40:50 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 487 | View Replies]

To: Map Kernow
Why didn't you snort that Bush should've chosen a good ol' boy from Baylor that wildcatted rigs to put himself through law school?

Because Bush chose Roberts, and Bush's picks have been impeccable.

That is one the primary reasons I'm supporting Miers. To think that he would be cavalier about a Supreme Court nominee when he has been scrupulous about his lower court picks is a non starter, for me.

492 posted on 10/07/2005 7:41:31 PM PDT by sinkspur (American Staffordshire Terriers should be bred out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies]

To: Map Kernow
1. The fact that you use the word "crony" to describe a person with whom Bush has worked for a long time says a lot. It's a derogatory term, one used to create an impression without benefit of facts or evidence.

2. You and Bork apparently believe that someone like Ginsburg is more "excellent" than Miers because of her experience in constitutional law. I'd much rather rely on the President's subjective knowledge of Miers conservative principles or philosophy than on a standard solely related to experience or knowledge.
493 posted on 10/07/2005 7:42:17 PM PDT by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 461 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts

Nope, after midnight is saturday and Bush will not pay for overtime.


494 posted on 10/07/2005 7:42:56 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
How come we support Priscialla Owen, who went to Baylor?

Bush nominated her for her current position. He knew her, he vouched for her, personally.

That's the same stance he's taking with Miers.

495 posted on 10/07/2005 7:43:24 PM PDT by sinkspur (American Staffordshire Terriers should be bred out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

Nope, it's a gloss on Article 2. An explication. But thanks for the suggestion.


496 posted on 10/07/2005 7:44:40 PM PDT by phelanw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 456 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts

Ah yes, when facts do not support you, attack the person. When they do, it is a sure indication they are are unsure of their arguments.


497 posted on 10/07/2005 7:44:43 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 489 | View Replies]

Comment #498 Removed by Moderator

To: zook
For all the hard work, you got a Republican Senate that won't back a Republican President. Good for Bush for nominating a stealth conservative, one that can avoid a filibuster

No sale.

First, your argument only bolsters the notion that Bush turned yellow and ran from a fight.
Second, I don't buy the conventional wisdom that six (6) RINOs would have voted against a qualified conservative nominee. Do the math: I count Chafee as the most likely traitor and Snowe "too close to call". Collins, maybe. Warner, less maybe. Specter, possibly, although unlikely given the riot act that was read to him when he was allowed to take the Chairmanship. (And remember, Specter was NOT in the "Gang")

That's five (5). And that's five only IF ALL FIVE go against a President of their own party and vote against a qualified nominee simply because the DEMOCRATS say that that nominee is "too conservative". Cheney is the 51st vote in the unlikely scenario that it becomes necessary.

So Luttig (or somebody similar) gets confirmed. (This stuff is easy when you do the math.)

By the way, NO WAY does McCain vote against a good conservative nominee - - the guy wants to be President and he isn't a complete idiot. Also, Graham and DeWine will vote FOR a qualified conservative nominee, guaranteed. (Hopefully by now most people understand the genius of the "Gang of Fourteen" deal, and appreciate Graham and DeWine's sacrifice in agreeing to become ringers in that amazing neutering of the Democrats' filibuster threat.)

This was a horrible nomination. The hearings will once again be a meaningless and uninformative TV show starring a bunch of blowhard Senators, and in the end we conservatives will be left with nothing else to do but cross our fingers and hope that Miers turns out to be no worse than O'Connor. Wow. That's just great.....

That is NOT what I voted for.

Bush was handed a probably-never-again opportunity to save the nation from the onslaught of the Euro-style secular socialism that the Democrats have been foisting on us through the courts for decades. This was the biggest, most important decision of his Presidency, and Bush blew it.
Needlessly.

The magnitude of this blunder cannot be overstated. I am sick to my stomach about this.

499 posted on 10/07/2005 7:45:39 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies]

To: zook

> Quite frankly, the loudest attackers have the least loyalty to this President.

Like Dingy Harry Reid? Oh wait... he supported Miers.


500 posted on 10/07/2005 7:45:42 PM PDT by VictoryGal (Never give up, never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 941-943 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson