Posted on 10/07/2005 3:50:01 PM PDT by Sam Hill
How come we support Priscialla Owen, who went to Baylor?
Assuming of course, that anyone asks her difficult questions and she answers them.
Says you.
Some of us respectfully disagree.
Cyn Good to see a up state New Yorker here.
I'm getting the feeling some of these characters are posting from the White House basement.
Who is on the rest of her list, and why?
You want to know for sure??? Wait til midnight when their shift is over.
Absolute, scurrilous nonsense. Demanding qualifications is not the same as elitism. Quit the phoney "dumbed down" posturing, Bush hacks. The GOP base isn't going to let you talk to them as if they were a bunch of uneducated envious dolts---those type of people are Democrats for the most part anyway.
Critics of Miers, some prominent have listed as a disqualification that she went to SMU. That's elitism.
None of our found fathers went to an elite law school.
BTW, not knowing a lot about Miers I've yet to endorse her.
Your remark about being me being a "hack" makes you a idiot.
You're defense of elitism makes you a dunce.
And I would note that they are using the exact same tactics as the Clinton crowd. Personal attacks against anyone who dares criticize the president.
Ya, the questions of Roberts were not too swift in general. The Judiciary Committee is not overloaded with rocket scientists.
Isn't there a replacement crew that will relieve them? :-)
Because Bush chose Roberts, and Bush's picks have been impeccable.
That is one the primary reasons I'm supporting Miers. To think that he would be cavalier about a Supreme Court nominee when he has been scrupulous about his lower court picks is a non starter, for me.
Nope, after midnight is saturday and Bush will not pay for overtime.
Bush nominated her for her current position. He knew her, he vouched for her, personally.
That's the same stance he's taking with Miers.
Nope, it's a gloss on Article 2. An explication. But thanks for the suggestion.
Ah yes, when facts do not support you, attack the person. When they do, it is a sure indication they are are unsure of their arguments.
No sale.
First, your argument only bolsters the notion that Bush turned yellow and ran from a fight.
Second, I don't buy the conventional wisdom that six (6) RINOs would have voted against a qualified conservative nominee. Do the math: I count Chafee as the most likely traitor and Snowe "too close to call". Collins, maybe. Warner, less maybe. Specter, possibly, although unlikely given the riot act that was read to him when he was allowed to take the Chairmanship. (And remember, Specter was NOT in the "Gang")
That's five (5). And that's five only IF ALL FIVE go against a President of their own party and vote against a qualified nominee simply because the DEMOCRATS say that that nominee is "too conservative". Cheney is the 51st vote in the unlikely scenario that it becomes necessary.
So Luttig (or somebody similar) gets confirmed. (This stuff is easy when you do the math.)
By the way, NO WAY does McCain vote against a good conservative nominee - - the guy wants to be President and he isn't a complete idiot. Also, Graham and DeWine will vote FOR a qualified conservative nominee, guaranteed. (Hopefully by now most people understand the genius of the "Gang of Fourteen" deal, and appreciate Graham and DeWine's sacrifice in agreeing to become ringers in that amazing neutering of the Democrats' filibuster threat.)
This was a horrible nomination. The hearings will once again be a meaningless and uninformative TV show starring a bunch of blowhard Senators, and in the end we conservatives will be left with nothing else to do but cross our fingers and hope that Miers turns out to be no worse than O'Connor. Wow. That's just great.....
That is NOT what I voted for.
Bush was handed a probably-never-again opportunity to save the nation from the onslaught of the Euro-style secular socialism that the Democrats have been foisting on us through the courts for decades. This was the biggest, most important decision of his Presidency, and Bush blew it.
Needlessly.
The magnitude of this blunder cannot be overstated. I am sick to my stomach about this.
> Quite frankly, the loudest attackers have the least loyalty to this President.
Like Dingy Harry Reid? Oh wait... he supported Miers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.