Skip to comments.
CA: 'Property rights' group becomes formalized
Daily Democrat ^
| 10/06/2005
Posted on 10/06/2005 10:24:09 PM PDT by calcowgirl
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: ALOHA RONNIE; ambrose; Amerigomag; antceecee; atomic_dog; AVNevis; B4Ranch; backtothestreets; ...
McClintock Ping List -- Please freepmail me if anyone wants on or off this list
To: freepatriot32; editor-surveyor; GreenFreeper
To: calcowgirl
4
posted on
10/06/2005 10:35:59 PM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: abbi_normal_2; adam_az; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; alphadog; AMDG&BVMH; amom; AndreaZingg; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.List of Ping lists
5
posted on
10/06/2005 11:33:01 PM PDT
by
freepatriot32
(Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
To: calcowgirl
6
posted on
10/07/2005 12:37:47 AM PDT
by
Seadog Bytes
("Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist". George Carlin)
To: freepatriot32
7
posted on
10/07/2005 2:59:34 AM PDT
by
E.G.C.
To: calcowgirl
8
posted on
10/07/2005 2:59:52 AM PDT
by
E.G.C.
To: calcowgirl
Where was this group when the smoking bans were put in place?
9
posted on
10/07/2005 7:28:33 AM PDT
by
CSM
(When laws are written, they apply to ALL...Not just the yucky people you don't like. - HairOfTheDog)
To: CSM
Could you elucidate the connection between Kelo v New London, eminent domain and smoking bans? I'm not sure I follow.
10
posted on
10/07/2005 8:09:09 AM PDT
by
Betis70
(Every generation needs a new revolution)
To: calcowgirl
Thanks for the ping. I couldn't google up a website for this "California Alliance to Protect Private Property Rights". Maybe it is too early in their development.
11
posted on
10/07/2005 8:15:17 AM PDT
by
Betis70
(Every generation needs a new revolution)
To: CSM
Where was this group when the smoking bans were put in place?Smoking bans don't take anyone's rights or property. You can still smoke and patronize any business you want in California, you just can't smoke there. Contrary to the smoke filled minds of smokers it hasn't hurt, in fact it's improved business.
12
posted on
10/07/2005 8:22:47 AM PDT
by
lewislynn
(Status quo today is the result of eliminating the previous status quo. Be careful what you wish for)
To: Betis70
The ability of the property owner to determine how he would like to use his property. Many FReepers are all for smoking bans imposed by governments, yet are against the Kelo decision. The difference is that the bans are incremental theft while ED is complete and swift theft.
13
posted on
10/07/2005 9:11:26 AM PDT
by
CSM
(When laws are written, they apply to ALL...Not just the yucky people you don't like. - HairOfTheDog)
To: Betis70
The ability of the property owner to determine how he would like to use his property. Many FReepers are all for smoking bans imposed by governments, yet are against the Kelo decision. The difference is that the bans are incremental theft while ED is complete and swift theft.
14
posted on
10/07/2005 9:11:31 AM PDT
by
CSM
(When laws are written, they apply to ALL...Not just the yucky people you don't like. - HairOfTheDog)
To: lewislynn
"Smoking bans don't take anyone's rights or property."
Except of course, the property owner's right to chose which customers he WANTS to cater to and how the property owner WANTS to use his property!
Other than that, you're dead on!
15
posted on
10/07/2005 9:12:55 AM PDT
by
CSM
(When laws are written, they apply to ALL...Not just the yucky people you don't like. - HairOfTheDog)
To: CSM
OK I thought that was where you were coming from, I just wasn't sure. Thanks.
16
posted on
10/07/2005 9:21:34 AM PDT
by
Betis70
(Every generation needs a new revolution)
To: Betis70
Dear Swamp Yankee,
Sorry about the dupe posts.
CSM
17
posted on
10/07/2005 9:26:09 AM PDT
by
CSM
(When laws are written, they apply to ALL...Not just the yucky people you don't like. - HairOfTheDog)
To: calcowgirl
Thank you.
No amount of legalese
can possibly explain
the sheer abuse and callous use
of eminent domain.
18
posted on
10/07/2005 9:34:55 AM PDT
by
b9
To: Betis70
Maybe it is too early in their development. I think you're right--I couldn't find anything either.
To: calcowgirl
Good news.
Thanks for the ping.
20
posted on
10/07/2005 10:50:15 AM PDT
by
Czar
(StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson