Posted on 10/05/2005 9:42:57 PM PDT by quidnunc
"Oh, you mean about Miers? What if YOU are wrong?"
Of course I was teasing about the end of the world, but the best you can offer is a 50/50 proposition that Miers is the right candidate, though Bush has let us down before. There were plenty of sure picks to choose from, and GW flinched.
Paul Weyrich = barking moonbat?
Suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure.
Coyote dude, or dudette, as the case may be, I think we're gonna have to agree to disagree. My proposition isn't a 50/50 deal. I'm just saying I am not ready to "wet the bed" over President Bush's pick of Miers for the court, as so many here are. Maybe the booers and hissers and oh-my-god-its-the-end-of-the-world-as-we-know-it folks are right. Maybe the ones who prefer to sit back, take a deep breath and see what kind of person she turns out to be are right. Maybe none of us are right, and we'll all end up floating out in the atmosphere forever because of a president's pick of a terrible, Souter-like, justice. Stay tuned, we'll find out either way, soon.
I'm choosing to trust President Bush on this one. He knows Miers, and knows her well.
Quidnunc writes lots of ridiculous things.
Exactly.
Now (was) is the time to change that politically correct attitude in which solid conservative selections are said to be "out of the mainstream" and not to be considered.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.