Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court nominee was a supremely bad choice
Mobile Register ^ | 10/4/2005 | Quin Hillyer

Posted on 10/04/2005 2:32:49 PM PDT by wjersey

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last
To: M203M4
Or Bush didn't deliver and, for once, it will be fair to say, "Bush fault!!" That the latter is possible makes me very sad. :(

Me too. However, based upon his performance in the past year, it will not surprise me if that is the way it turns out.
21 posted on 10/04/2005 2:49:38 PM PDT by safisoft (Give me Torah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn

"For a long, long time, observers on the right and left have said that President Bush doesn't bear criticism well, that he has assembled an administration of "yes men" (and women), that he lives in an insular bubble of adulation bordering on toadyism. The nomination of White House Counsel Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court confirms that impression."

That is going on in full force on FR. If I hear "I Trust Him" one more time as the sole qualifier for this nominee I think I am going to puke.



22 posted on 10/04/2005 2:50:12 PM PDT by chris1 ("Make the other guy die for his countary" - George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Parmenio
My friend, you speak the truth, but I wouldn't spend too much time trying to convince most folks around here.

The funniest thing I've seen today was this e-mail to NRO's The Corner: "Bush appoints his accountant to head the Fed." That would make about as much sense as this nomination. I can't believe Bush actually had the gall to claim she was the most qualified candidate he could find. Give me a break. No one is buying that crap!

23 posted on 10/04/2005 2:50:59 PM PDT by sola_fide (Anti-intellectualism is just as dangerous as elitism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
The truth is that she's not such an awful pick, but the sad part is the number of far more qualified candidates who were passed over.

Which is why trusting Bush's feeeeelings seems so foolish. "Best qualified" was what he said today. That was an idiotic thing to say. "Best Connected" was the truth.
24 posted on 10/04/2005 2:51:29 PM PDT by safisoft (Give me Torah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

People have short memories.


25 posted on 10/04/2005 2:51:44 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: safisoft

Exactly. Why not pick someone in their late 40's?????


26 posted on 10/04/2005 2:52:26 PM PDT by chris1 ("Make the other guy die for his countary" - George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: sola_fide

OMG! That really does put it in perspective. GWB picks his CPA to the Fed to replace Greenspan. This is too sad to cry.


27 posted on 10/04/2005 2:54:41 PM PDT by chris1 ("Make the other guy die for his countary" - George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Altamira
It's the "smarty pants" ones that you have to watch out for, those that engage in the "creative" lawyering that is destroying this country.

Not to mention the "conservatives" who are too dainty to do something as boorish as overturn any of that creative lawyering that has already happened.

28 posted on 10/04/2005 2:55:19 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wjersey
"toadyism"

Yep, toadyism, and this here ain't even the White House.

29 posted on 10/04/2005 2:56:24 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
I'm just heart broken that the Pres didn't let the Mobile Register and other media pick the nominee.

Quinn has been an ardent supporter of President Bush and his Judicial nominees. He has worked relentlessly to get them confirmed and has a website called "Confirmthem.com"

This is not about Conservative being unduly critical of President Bush, this is about President Bush making a grievous error. He is a Human Being and he does make errors, even he knows that.

30 posted on 10/04/2005 2:56:45 PM PDT by msnimje (Hurricane KATRINA - An Example of Nature's Enforcement of Eminent Domain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

And absolutely zero evidence that she even knows how to interpret the Constitution.


31 posted on 10/04/2005 2:57:08 PM PDT by MarcusTulliusCicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Nothing but ad hominems against Meirs.

I see few ad hominems against Ms. Miers in the piece. It reads more as critical of President Bush than critical or Ms. Miers. Sure, her background and experience are compared with those of some judges, but that is not attacking her as a person.

32 posted on 10/04/2005 2:57:37 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wjersey

Does this mean Vice President Cheney has to take over, or is he collateral damage necessitating the elevation of Dennis Hastert?

Just want to understand the ramifications of this fine screed declaring the current presidency dead. I'd hate to see Norm Mineta end up in power.


33 posted on 10/04/2005 2:57:59 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wjersey
For the Supreme Court of the United States, a president under fire for cronyism has chosen the ultimate crony.

And we'll see so-called conservatives parroting the current liberal cronyism spin, all the while ignoring the fact that Rehnquist would have fit the definition of Nixon White House crony as well - and also had no judicial experience at the time of his nomination.

Let's not help out the Dem spinners and see if we can figure out what Miers actually stands for, and then decide.

34 posted on 10/04/2005 2:59:00 PM PDT by dirtboy (Drool overflowed my buffer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Wonder why then the Conservative Legal group The Federalist Society does NOT agree with your characterization of Meirs?

Maybe because they only pretend to be conservative? Just a hypothesis, that's all.

But this isn't a hypothesis: the MSM and Harry Reid definitely do not pretend to be liberal. They're the real McCoy. And they're quite happy with Miers.

35 posted on 10/04/2005 2:59:18 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: chris1
"For a long, long time, observers on the right and left have said that President Bush doesn't bear criticism well, that he has assembled an administration of "yes men" (and women), that he lives in an insular bubble of adulation bordering on toadyism. The nomination of White House Counsel Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court confirms that impression."

If I could offer to translate this from MSM into English:

President Bush doesn't bear criticism well

"He doesn't do what we tell him to do!"

that he has assembled an administration of "yes men" (and women)

"Why didn't he appoint Daschle and Kennedy to his cabinet?"

that he lives in an insular bubble of adulation bordering on toadyism

"He ignores our criticisms of him - again, he doesn't do what we tell him to do!"

36 posted on 10/04/2005 3:00:53 PM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: wjersey
Because Ms. Miers' resumé is comparatively thin, President Bush in effect is asking Americans just to trust his judgment. But this is the man who said he looked into Vladimir Putin's soul and liked what he saw.

Ouch.

37 posted on 10/04/2005 3:01:16 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wjersey

I'm not sure that I like this nomination, but Mr. Hillyer is over the top, here.


38 posted on 10/04/2005 3:02:19 PM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inquest

Still working for the DNC I see Inquest.


39 posted on 10/04/2005 3:02:25 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Why is so much of the "Conservative" media punditry stuck on stupid?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wjersey

"...this president has ignored dozens of candidates with impeccable credentials -- top law school honors, judicial clerkships, distinguished careers in academia, lengthy experience arguing cases before the Supreme Court, superb records as federal judges..."

Thank God! Just what we don't need on the bench is another g*dd*m CLINTONITE like those that are described above! God Bless GWB!!!

I trust him, and if he says she's the right person for the job, then for me she IS!

(And I will not engage any of you Buchananite/McCainiac/Perotozoa types on this site who want to knock those of us who love and respect GWB, and seem to think that only some 3rd party idiot can do the job right. You all can kiss my @ss, cause you're dangerous and will help Hillary and Bill with their evil plans.)

40 posted on 10/04/2005 3:03:27 PM PDT by Husker8877
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson