Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US court denies white students' discrimination case
Reuters ^ | 10/03/05

Posted on 10/03/2005 12:41:58 PM PDT by nypokerface

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: newcthem

"Roberts has been on the court less than a week......Do you really believe he has read all the cases that were presented?....Give the guy a break."


Are you saying he didn't vote on the case?

They are setting "Law of the land" not what's for lunch on Tuesday.

As long we continue to hold a race and declare the guy in 4th place the winner we will be about distroying our future not building it.

Some white kids work their backsides off and then because they are what? the wrong color, not poor enough? Some I already got mine, wanna feel good social engineer wrecks their dreams.

It is a horrible ruling racist and elitist.

Social engineering and not justice.

Give the Kids a break instead and treat them fairly.


Wm


41 posted on 10/03/2005 2:51:39 PM PDT by WLR (Elitism is a mental disorder, contagious and deadly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: chimera
Yet another example of a "justice" system gone mad, upholding a law clearly in violation of the principle of equal protection under the law. IOW, everyone is protected under the law, except when they're not. Where do you turn when the courts and judges are corrupt. Where do you go when the system of "justice" is bereft of justice? I guess we need to learn a lesson from history. When faced with such dilemmas, the patriots of old turned to their ammunition lockers. Could very well happen again if too many mainstream people feel marginalized by the "justice" system in this country.

Soap Box (your voice in the wilderness), Ballot Box (if it meant anything any longer it would be outlawed), Cartridge Box! The first two boxes appear to have run their course. They are fast becoming no impedence. Blackbird.

42 posted on 10/03/2005 3:30:43 PM PDT by BlackbirdSST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

I know your post wasn't meant for me but I'll comment anyway. I am glad that no one was monetarily compensated since the expense will only be passed onto the students. I also think that if Roberts was involved he probably saw that this case was decided by the voters already anyway which was to strike it down. I am glad.


43 posted on 10/03/2005 6:01:37 PM PDT by cyborg (I'm on the 24 plan having the best day ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright
There is no ideological diversity in our newsrooms, wouldn't there be a more compelling interest here......?

The NBA seems to be functioning quite well with very little diversity......

My girlfriend went to Sweet Briar, an all girls' school in central Virginia. She feels the ABSENCE of diversity, (read boys) is what made her experience there quite fruitful as far as obtaining an education.

But you see, in a world gone mad like this one, those forms of "discrimination" aren't unacceptable, since the victims are only males/whites/conservatives, who somehow "deserve" such discrimination. In fact, in the newspeak of a world gone mad, there is no such thing as discrimination against white male conservatives, only retribution and a righting of "past wrongs".

Well, go ahead and marginalize us further, liberals and PC clowns. Last I checked, we still shoot straighter than you...

44 posted on 10/03/2005 6:55:36 PM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: HitmanNY

Here is another damages issue. There are so many law schools in the USA that literally there are more first year seats than first year students. ANYBODY with a four year degree can find an ACREDITED law school to take them. ANYBODY.

The it is only a matter of passing the desired bar exams. That is there are bar exam prep courses.

It is a 100% certainty that some OTHER law school would take them.


45 posted on 10/03/2005 7:03:16 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Right. It's just a bogus, shallow case at this stage and the USSC was right to not give it the time of day.


46 posted on 10/03/2005 7:09:01 PM PDT by HitmanLV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
Which would mean Justice Roberts participated, but we don't know whether he voted to hear the appeal or not.

I said this, and wanted to correct it, because I found out yesterday I was wrong. I read that the refusal to hear the appeal was actually voted on before Roberts took office, and they just waited until the first day of the new term to announce it.

47 posted on 10/05/2005 10:16:31 AM PDT by untenured (http://futureuncertain.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: untenured

"I said this, and wanted to correct it, because I found out yesterday I was wrong. I read that the refusal to hear the appeal was actually voted on before Roberts took office, and they just waited until the first day of the new term to announce it."

Aha. Thank you. That explains the (lack of) press reaction.


48 posted on 10/05/2005 10:41:15 AM PDT by gondramB (Conservatism is a positive doctrine. Reactionaryism is a negative doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson