Skip to comments.
Battle Over Model War Planes
cbs news ^
| 9/27/2005
Posted on 10/02/2005 3:13:50 PM PDT by tophat9000
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
This is lawyer stupidly run amuck... What interesting is where does it stop after all the plane manufacture does not make ever component on the plane so if you do a model F15 do you have to get a copywriter not just from the manufacture but also from the tire maker because you model plane has models of there tires and from the engine maker because you model shows model of the engines afterburner cans or the ejection seat maker etc
Model making is an artform like sculpting so if making a model is a copywriter violation of the image so is a photo or painting
To: tophat9000
Last time I was at he Air Force Museum the admission was FREE ! This was built with tax dollars to show what our tax dollars were used for in the history of aviation warfare .Awesome place .Recommend it to everyone of all ages .
2
posted on
10/02/2005 3:26:12 PM PDT
by
Renegade
To: tophat9000
On the legal side, it all comes down to the contact. If our representatives want to let the manufacturer keep the trademark rights, or not, they can specify it.
Of course, those morons should realize that when little boys develop enthusiasm for military planes, they will tend to support higher defense procurements in the long run.
If I were them, I'd ask for a nominal royalty, and then donate it to the Boy Scouts. That way, I'd be sure that production was limited to domestic manufacturers of models. Make the Chinese imports pay through the nose.
3
posted on
10/02/2005 3:30:10 PM PDT
by
Atlas Sneezed
(Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
To: tophat9000
so if you do a model F15 do you have to get a copywriter not just from the manufacture but also from the tire maker
It's about trademarks (e.g. "F-15") and not replicating the airplane. Of course, they need to explain how a trademark covering aircraft applies to the sale of children's models. Totally different classes of goods, and the use on different goods does not diminish the value of the trademark (it arguably increases it.)
4
posted on
10/02/2005 3:32:05 PM PDT
by
Atlas Sneezed
(Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
To: tophat9000
Union Pacific recently started a similar campaign, requiring railroad model manufacturers to pay royalties or face lawsuits, for all of their acquired railroads, including the Southern Pacific, Missouri Pacific, Denver and Rio Grande, etc. The claim was that they had to do this, otherwise they lose the right to defend their trademarks.In contrast, Burlington Northern Santa Fe has not only declined to follow suit, but actively worked with Microsoft on their Train Simulator Product.
The result has not only been a black eye for UP, but a PR boost for BNSF. Moral of the story: don't always listen to counsel...
5
posted on
10/02/2005 3:35:38 PM PDT
by
HolgerDansk
("Oh Bother", said Pooh, as he worked the bolt.)
To: tophat9000
The defense giants do hold trademarks on planes like the F-15, F-16 and the B-17, and they say if a model company uses their planes to build replicas, it should pay royalties. Then why don't car manufacturers who are not supported by taxpayers like the defense industry demanding to do the same?
6
posted on
10/02/2005 3:36:03 PM PDT
by
Bommer
To: tophat9000
Let's see
I'm going to start making mini nickel size hamburgers that taste like cardboard.
Think McDonald's will sue me???
7
posted on
10/02/2005 3:38:17 PM PDT
by
JZoback
("There's a pony in here somewhere")
To: tophat9000
Great thinking on the part of defense contractors. Model airplanes will be exclusively manufactured in Chinese knock-off shops and sold in flea markets around the country.
8
posted on
10/02/2005 3:40:42 PM PDT
by
Nachoman
To: Bommer
Defense giants are being jerks. Scale models are a free form of advertising of their companies capabilities. Interest in scale models of defense equipment increases the hobbyists interest to look up info on it. They learn the history, the capability and etc, and when they grow up they become an educated voter on defense matters. I know many servicemen who first became interested in military matters as a kid building scale models of tanks, planes and ships.
9
posted on
10/02/2005 3:42:14 PM PDT
by
Fee
(Great powers never let minor allies dictate who, where and when they must fight.)
To: Bommer
"Then why don't car manufacturers who are not supported by taxpayers like the defense industry demanding to do the same?" Because the auto manufacturers, being REAL capalists (instead of pseudo-capitalists "sucking the government tit"), understand that car and truck models are FREE ADVERTISING.
To: Beelzebubba
That way, I'd be sure that production was limited to domestic manufacturers of models. Make the Chinese imports pay through the nose.
Good idea very few American model manufacturers left. Most of what I pick up are made in China, Korea or Japan.
11
posted on
10/02/2005 3:45:24 PM PDT
by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
To: tophat9000
"This is lawyer stupidly run amuck.."
Repeat forever!
12
posted on
10/02/2005 3:47:46 PM PDT
by
litehaus
To: tophat9000
This is scary.
Further proof the bean counters are running the show instead of what we use to call in aerospace: "aircrafters".
The dumb *ast@r&s are to stupid to know the next generation of aviation professionals usually start with static models and move to control and R/C, Ergo Burt Rutan.
They are destroying the next generation of folks they will need to hire......
To: tophat9000
Is not copywrite, or copyleft, is copyRIGHT. I am series!
To: tophat9000
15
posted on
10/02/2005 3:53:57 PM PDT
by
Fiddlstix
(Tagline Repair Service. Let us fix those broken Taglines. Inquire within(Presented by TagLines R US))
To: JZoback
Let's see I'm going to start making mini nickel size hamburgers that taste like cardboard.
. Think McDonald's will sue me???
No...but White Castle might!
16
posted on
10/02/2005 3:54:09 PM PDT
by
Don Corleone
(Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
To: HolgerDansk
Union Pacific recently started a similar campaign, requiring railroad model manufacturers to pay royalties or face lawsuits... Being a model railroader, I've read about this idiocy. You would think railroads would look at models as free advertising. I guess it's a case of an oversupply of lawyers and an undersupply of public relations.
17
posted on
10/02/2005 3:54:12 PM PDT
by
6SJ7
To: tophat9000
John Long, who owns a model company, says the defense contractors don't deserve a penny, because these airplanes were developed with tax dollars. True.
18
posted on
10/02/2005 3:55:28 PM PDT
by
Tribune7
To: tophat9000
MAZDA has started the same idiocy over their little roadster the MIATA claiming foul if you form a "MIATA" club or make "MIATA" pins or the like. Definetly the work of Harvard Business School graduates who have previously demonstrated their business acumen by running the US Airline industry into the ground. IDIOTS!
19
posted on
10/02/2005 3:58:32 PM PDT
by
Don Corleone
(Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
To: Renegade
Last time I was at he Air Force Museum the admission was FREE ! This was built with tax dollars to show what our tax dollars were used for in the history of aviation warfare .Awesome place .Recommend it to everyone of all ages . The one at Wright-Patterson? NOT to be missed, if you're anywhere near the place. It's one of the most amazing museums that I have ever been in. Be sure also to visit The Annex- on the other side of the field, where you can walk through every Air Force One except the current one, which is busy, of course. GREAT museum!
20
posted on
10/02/2005 3:59:26 PM PDT
by
Riley
("Bother" said Pooh, as he fired the Claymores.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson