Skip to comments.
Hillary Clinton Urges Katrina Aid for Illegal Immigrants
NewsMax ^
| 10/2/05
| NewsMax
Posted on 10/02/2005 11:51:09 AM PDT by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 141-150 next last
To: wagglebee
Attention, Freepers. We need to leave the country and re-enter it illegally, so that Presidential candidates will kowtow to us.
To: KevinDavis
Her actions here certainly do contradict her statements about immigration in CERTAIN venues...the adage, "Believe actions not words" comes to mind
To: wagglebee
In exchange for More Votes by Immigrants. The Democrats are Desperate Vote Seekers.
To: BIRDS
I'd like to wash my hands of the whole illegal alien issue, but that's just not possible because I'm too ticked off to simply give up on attempting to get the feds to enforce our laws! It is very, very frustrating.
To: R.W.Ratikal
For pete's sake, you can't even rent a video or use a credit card without an i.d., voting is SO MUCH MORE IMPORTANT!!
85
posted on
10/02/2005 1:26:42 PM PDT
by
bethtopaz
(May we preserve the unique character of our country that Providece has granted us.)
To: Types_with_Fist
This is absurd. No... it's ASININE.
No...for a Senator it's TREASONOUS!
86
posted on
10/02/2005 1:28:12 PM PDT
by
DCPatriot
("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
To: TexasCajun
Amnesty for illegals is both the policy and practice of the George Bush administration, whose eight years will see more illegals enter the USA than the eight years of Clinton.
The practice: A five-year ongoing conspiracy with Mexico, to allow millions of illegals to live openly in the USA, under the Bush-Fox "matricula-card" amnesty.
The Policy: Sneak, or slide, or shove the largest-ever overt amnesty scheme down our throats - though dishonestly call it something other than amnesty.
87
posted on
10/02/2005 1:28:38 PM PDT
by
dagnabbit
(Vincente Fox's opening line at the Mexico-USA summit meeting: "Bring out the Gimp!")
To: wagglebee
The animosity between Hillary and Chertoff goes back to the Clinton administration but I can't for the life of me remember what it was. All I remember is he opposed her on something and she lost. I guess I've tried to make myself believe that Hillary doesn't really exist; that the whole Clinton mess was one big nightmare. Whatever it was, I'm sure that she's delighted that Chertoff is now in a position where she can make his life miserable.
To: wagglebee
Hillary Clinton onto ever pandering for votes and ever calculating how to expand her voting blocs. Hillary will advocate giving voting privileges to felons and illegal immigrants. (Senator)Hillary Clinton calling for the termination of "removal proceedings against" illegal immigrants is treasonous, and shows her total lack of concern for American citizens. Legal immigrants earn their citizenship by taking a basic test proving they understand the U.S. form of government and its constitution, and their rights as legitimate citizens.
Hillary is outrageous and ruthless, and she should be thrown out of the Senate for betraying her oath of office.
89
posted on
10/02/2005 1:38:07 PM PDT
by
purpleland
(Vigilance and Valour!)
To: Revererdrv
I don't understand. The Dems and the Reps want amnesty for a larger voting base. Both parties think if they get the amnesty first, that their party will get the votes. I don't think the illegals are that loyal. Their interest still lie in Mexico. I'm probably wrong, but it makes more sense to me for one of the parties to oppose amnesty to deny votes to the other party.
To: Thank You Rush
Gosh - when memory fails, check GOOGLE. Chertoff was special counsel for the investigations into Whitewater and Hillary cast the only Senate vote against Chertoff for a federal judgeship later on. She may have had to wait awhile to put her hooks into him again but she managed it.
To: LurkedLongEnough
I heard somewhere, probably on Hannity, that there are more illegal immigrants than legal immigrants in the U.S. today.
This unsubstantiated stat should be researched. If true, it is obvious that it is far easier to be an illegal.
92
posted on
10/02/2005 1:45:36 PM PDT
by
purpleland
(Vigilance and Valour!)
To: purpleland
True. there is a post on it.
To: gubamyster; HiJinx
94
posted on
10/02/2005 1:52:30 PM PDT
by
raybbr
To: purpleland
To: wagglebee
And what do the other Jr. senators have to say about this?
96
posted on
10/02/2005 2:00:07 PM PDT
by
truthpls
To: SMM48
Hillary's Political Pander is not a synonym for nor a symptom of compassion. Her playbook is the neoMarxist manual for class warfare and dissonance. Refer to her ruthless radical mentor's (whats-his-name) writings.
97
posted on
10/02/2005 2:00:33 PM PDT
by
purpleland
(Vigilance and Valour!)
To: wagglebee
98
posted on
10/02/2005 2:04:47 PM PDT
by
purpleland
(Vigilance and Valour!)
To: wagglebee
The Democrats have thrown away a winning issue. Then again pandering to their kook fringe base is more important than keeping our country safe. Just amazing - they do step right in sh*t and they never miss an opportunity to remain stuck on stupid. And we're told Hillary is the smartest woman in America. Well - if she's so smart, what is she doing writing Homeland Security asking it to break the laws to help illegal aliens??
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
99
posted on
10/02/2005 2:05:06 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: BIRDS
Significant exerpts from article dated Jan 7 2003 by Diane Alden, at http://tysknews.com
[HILLARY CLINTON}Saul Alinsky and DNC Corruption
Diane Alden Jan. 7, 2003
[...]
Indeed, Alinsky wrote the rule book for '60s radicals like Bill and Hillary Clinton, George Miller and Nancy Pelosi. He considered Hillary Rodham to be one of his better students and asked her to join him in his efforts as an organizer of radical leftist causes. But Hillary had other fish to fry on her climb to national prominence.
Alinsky had a true genius for formulating tactical battle plans for the radical left. He wrote two books outlining his organizational principles and strategies: "Reveille for Radicals" (1946) and "Rules for Radicals" (1971).
"Rules for Radicals" begins with an unusual tribute: "From all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom Lucifer."
The devil challenged authority and got his own kingdom, and that goes to the heart of what left is really about. That of course is to get power any way you can, including lying, cheating and stealing. The ultimate rule is that the ends justify the means.
Alinsky asserted that he was more concerned with the acquisition of power than anything else: "My aim here is to suggest how to organize for power: how to get it and how to use it." This is not to be done with assistance to the poor, nor even by organizing the poor to demand assistance: "[E]ven if all the low-income parts of our population were organized ... it would not be powerful enough to get significant, basic, needed changes."
[Hillary's mentor] Alinsky advises his followers that the poor have no power and that the real target is the middle class: "Organization for action will now and in the decade ahead center upon America's white middle class. That is where the power is. ... Our rebels have contemptuously rejected the values and the way of life of the middle class. They have stigmatized it as materialistic, decadent, bourgeois, degenerate, imperialistic, war-mongering, brutalized and corrupt. They are right; but we must begin from where we are if we are to build power for change, and the power and the people are in the middle class majority."
But that didn't stop [Hillary's mentor]Alinsky and his followers from using the middle class for their own purposes. They counted on the guilt and shame of the white middle class to get what they wanted. In order to take over institutions and get power, the middle class had to be convinced that they were somehow lucky winners in "life's lottery."
Alinsky's radicals found a perfect vehicle for their destruction of the American system and more particularly for taking and maintaining power. That instrument was the Democratic Party.
Transition and Transaction
The transition of the old Democratic Party to what exists today should not surprise or confound conservatives. Nor should Alinsky's tactics seem foreign. After all, for nearly 40 years, Republicans and the conservative agenda have been getting hammered by the left through the successful use of Alinsky tactics.
Wise up, Americans.
100
posted on
10/02/2005 2:17:49 PM PDT
by
purpleland
(Vigilance and Valour!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 141-150 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson