Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New charges may help pot activist
http://www.theglobeandmail.com ^ | 10 1 05 | CAMILLE BAINS

Posted on 10/01/2005 1:58:35 PM PDT by freepatriot32

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
interesting legal strategy.I hope it works
1 posted on 10/01/2005 1:58:38 PM PDT by freepatriot32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: albertp; Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Americanwolf; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
2 posted on 10/01/2005 1:59:24 PM PDT by freepatriot32 (Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

ping


3 posted on 10/01/2005 1:59:52 PM PDT by freepatriot32 (Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Yeah, it should work as so.

Charge him, punish him, then extradict him to America to be charged again. Works for me.


4 posted on 10/01/2005 2:05:30 PM PDT by KingKongCobra (Trying to save the "Donner Party" from themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

I don't much care what other people smoke. I just wish they'd turn their boom boxes down when they drive past my house.


5 posted on 10/01/2005 2:06:25 PM PDT by KarinG1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KingKongCobra; freepatriot32
Charge him, punish him, then extradict him to America to be charged again. Works for me.

Sorry, tough guy, Canadian law forbids that kind of double jeopardy.

6 posted on 10/01/2005 2:37:01 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

Marc Emery won't ever enter the US again, extradition or not. The Emery case is very politically unpopular in Canada. Nothing pisses off Canadians more the Americans lording over them.


7 posted on 10/01/2005 4:35:25 PM PDT by rasblue (Vive le libre Alberta!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KingKongCobra
Charge him, punish him, then extradict him to America to be charged again. Works for me.

I say good on Canada for the legal maneuvering. If we're going to go to the expense and strained relations of an international extradition, let it be for a real crime.

8 posted on 10/01/2005 5:03:38 PM PDT by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
“We have let him operate and now we let the Americans walk into our country and charge a man who they will probably lock away for the rest of his natural life in the United States for doing something that the government of Canada condoned. And you know, I got a problem with that as a Canadian.”

I got a problem with that as a human being. Anyone who doesn't have a problem with that, has a problem.

9 posted on 10/01/2005 7:43:49 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights

One would be hard pressed to not consider the case as the US telling Canada, "Sovereignty? What sovereignty?", if one was Canadian, I suspect.


10 posted on 10/02/2005 1:38:13 AM PDT by I_dmc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
“We have let him operate and now we let the Americans walk into our country and charge a man who they will probably lock away for the rest of his natural life in the United States for doing something that the government of Canada condoned. And you know, I got a problem with that as a Canadian.”

And you know, as an American, I've got a problem with Canada refusing to enforce its own laws until the U.S. steps in to do something about this drug exporter.

NOW they file local charges. Well that's just great. Took them what -- 10 years to realize he was breaking Canadian laws?

11 posted on 10/04/2005 12:27:39 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

"There are 100,000 total marijuana smokers in the US, and most are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos, and entertainers. Their Satanic music, jazz, and swing, result from marijuana use. This marijuana causes white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers, and any others."

"...the primary reason to outlaw marijuana is its effect on the degenerate races."

"Marijuana is an addictive drug which produces in its users insanity, criminality, and death."

"You smoke a joint and you're likely to kill your brother."

"Marijuana is the most violence-causing drug in the history of mankind."

HARRY J. ANSLINGER
"The Father of the Drug War"
Commissioner of the U.S. Bureau of Narcotics 1930-1962



12 posted on 10/04/2005 12:39:41 PM PDT by pnome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Bump for later


13 posted on 10/04/2005 12:43:40 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnome

And you bring up these 70-year-old quotes because ...?


14 posted on 10/04/2005 2:57:35 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
as an American, I've got a problem with Canada refusing to enforce its own laws until the U.S. steps in

Why? As an American, I think whether Canada enforces Canada's laws is purely Canada's business.

15 posted on 10/04/2005 3:21:20 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights
"I think whether Canada enforces Canada's laws is purely Canada's business."

Then you certainly would have no problem, unlike Mr. McCann, with the U.S. enforcing theirs.

16 posted on 10/04/2005 4:07:02 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

I think they speak for themselves.

The laws against marijuana in the U.S. are founded on nothing more than racism and ignorance.


17 posted on 10/05/2005 8:05:07 AM PDT by pnome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pnome
"The laws against marijuana in the U.S. are founded on nothing more than racism and ignorance."

One can certainly argue that point.

Second request: What does that have to do with our current marijuana laws? (Unless you're saying that our current laws are still based on racism and ignorance. If so, I'd like an example of that.)

18 posted on 10/05/2005 8:49:55 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
And you bring up these 70-year-old quotes because ...?

ROTFLMAO!!!
Why does that bother you? The Constitution is two hundred years old and people still quote it!
.
19 posted on 10/05/2005 8:56:03 AM PDT by radioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: radioman
"Why does that bother you? The Constitution is two hundred years old and people still quote it!"

The original U.S. Constitution has, as has Anslinger's original reasons, been updated to eliminate racism and ignorance.

20 posted on 10/05/2005 9:09:39 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson