Posted on 09/27/2005 9:16:35 PM PDT by maui_hawaii
Unlike what many people say, he's not a China basher. He just reveals whats really going on.
The truth speaks for itself.
"Beijing sees the U.S. as an inevitable foe, and is planning accordingly," warns the 60-year-old China expert.
Hmmm....are we planning accordingly?
"Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere" comes to mind.
As stated in the article he's not the king of the show. Many people oppose him and his positions (for whatever motive).
Reality's just no fun. Specially when it means you have to pay 20 bucks more for that boom box.
This same guy went to great lengths in a speech I once watched about how China watchers are split into two categories. The red team and the blue team. Either pro or con...
Then he went on to call the whole affair a load of BS...that its not so simple.
He is a very straight shooter. Thats why I like him. I might be accused of being a geek, but I am huge fan of his. I have put in 12 years of my own studying China and had many of the same opinions regarding China... then I happened across his books, tv appearances etc... WOW. Someone agreed with me...
My own various corporate bosses that I've had half the time want (but then again don't want) the whole story....
The problem with the panda huggin crowd is they can't back up their position with facts, only money.
Human nature requires us to compete over scarce resources and you cannot fault the Chinese in that regard. They want to be seen as equals in a world where they have allowed themselves to fall behind economically and culturally. Communism has isolated them and will continue to do so until they realize and accept western values as fundamental to the human condition.
Freedom, opportunity and expression can never be dictated by the state with a positive result.
CHINESE ESPIONAGE AND NATIONAL SECURITY
(from the Congressional Record, Proceedings of the U.S. House of Representatives) Monday, June 7, 1999
With that in mind, Mr. Speaker, the following two charts are now available on my web site nationally:
The first chart, Mr. Speaker, for the first time ever gives the complete linkage between those agencies and entities of the Peoples Liberation Army and the Central Military Commission of the PLA which are all indicated by the red boxes, and you cannot read them, our colleagues cannot read them, but you can get this off of our web site, and I have offered to give copies of this chart in a smaller form to
every Member of Congress regardless of party.
The two charts together reveal, among other things:
Cox Report Details Damage to U.S. National Security
By Congressman Curt WeldonThe COX REPORT: http://tinyurl.com/c3bl7
One cannot fault anyone for that, but one can definately fault them for drawing it as a win-lose zero sum proposition.
The goal of Communism has always been the defeat of the West, i.e. freedom and Capitalism.
China combines ancient Chinese tactics with modern day global politik.
We should never have befriended this country. We should have continued the Cold War mentality of not dealing with any Communist country. This Mr. Pillsbury has taken the U.S. on a journey that will lead to our defeat, most likely, even though he has belatedly learned his lesson.
I hope in that regard their long established cultural values and love of life would override such an irrational conclusion. Unfortunately the communists that run the government are power hungry and potentially indifferent to the human cost of a large exchange. We all know what fanatics can and will do to see their "vision" realized.
china, like everyone else in this world, has to realize that it will either capitulate to he demands of a CIVILIZED society or be ostracised from the world group of nations..... the minor countries are irrelevant, but china must be brought to the understanding that they will comply or cease to exist. There is no time left in history to fool around with non compliants...either join the rest of the world, or cease to exist!!!!!
Weldon Article from the RNC's Rising Tide: The China Connection -- Why Clinton-Gore Cannot Be Trusted with National Security (09/28/99)
http://web.archive.org/web/20000129022600/www.house.gov/curtweldon/oped_sum99.htm
Published in the Summer 1999
Issue of the RNC's Rising Tide
The China Connection
Why Clinton-Gore Cannot Be Trusted with National Security
By Congressman Curt Weldon
The Chinese espionage scandal and wholesale auctioning of sensitive technologies to China should erase any doubt in the minds of Americans that President Bill Clinton and Vice-President Al Gore are not to be trusted with our country's national security.
The dark legacy left by the Clinton-Gore Administration will place the lives of Americans at greater risk for generations to come. Under the Clinton-Gore watch China stole classified thermonuclear weapons information, stole electromagnetic weapons technology that it can use to attack U.S. satellites and missiles, and stole classified research that can be used to detect and threaten our previously invulnerable nuclear submarines. And that's just the tip of the iceberg.
But China did more than just steal information form the United States. Through a complex system of influence peddling and campaign contributions, China was also able to obtain relaxations on exports on a wide variety of sensitive technologies. In other words, the Clinton-Gore Administration gave away sensitive technologies to China in order to please big donors to the Democrat Party.
The relaxation of export controls, removal of national security agencies from the export approval process, and the dissolution of an international forum for controlling the transfer of military technologies under the Clinton-Gore Administration created an environment ripe for mistakes and abuse. It was the equivalent of setting out the welcome mat for the Chinese to gain access -- completely legally -- to our most sensitive technologies.
And the Chinese certainly took advantage of the situation. China -- which until 1996 had no high-performance computers to help design nuclear weapons -- had over 600 high performance computers in 1998, all originating from the United States. The Chinese have also obtained access to precision machine tools that it diverted to build military aircraft, cruise missiles, and nuclear weapons.
The seriousness of this matter is compounded by the fact that China is one of the world's worst proliferators of military technologies. It is likely that this technology will soon find its way into the hands of countries like North Korea, Iran, and Iraq.
Given the serious ramifications of the findings and recommendations of the bipartisan Cox Report, one would think that the American people could expect a serious, thoughtful response from the Clinton-Gore Administration. Instead, all we have seen are Administration attempts to "spin" the report and attempts to convince the American public that the President and Vice-President bear no responsibility for what has happened.
But they do. It was the Clinton-Gore Administration that eliminated FBI background checks at some of our most sensitive weapons laboratories. It was the Clinton-Gore Administration that eliminated color-coded employee ID badges -- denoting clearance levels -- at classified Department of Energy laboratories. It was the Clinton-Gore Administration that reinstated the security clearance of an employee being investigated for giving out sensitive and classified information. And it was the Clinton-Gore Administration that allowed the exports of these sensitive technologies.
But President Clinton and Vice President Gore have spent more energy trying to cover their butts than closing the barn door. The Administration has cracked down on the brave employees within the Departments of Defense and Energy who blew the whistle on the ineptitude of Clinton's political appointees and flawed policy toward China. Meanwhile, the people who bear the blame for the damage to our national security are walking away scott-free.
It is important to note, however, that the recent scandal does not mean that we should completely cut off relations with China or end trade. The United States can continue to engage in meaningful trade relations and the export of materials to China. But we have to be smart about it. We can't be giving China access to technologies that endanger our national security. The Clinton-Gore Administration left the flood gates wide open. There is a middle ground and we need to find it. On the issue of our political relations with China, we need to return to Ronald Reagan's principled approach to foreign policy: trust but verify.
If the Clinton-Gore Chinese espionage has taught us anything, we must learn that our military secrets and technology require constant vigilance and safeguarding. And President Clinton and Vice President Gore are not to be trusted with that oversight. XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Weldon Article from Insight Magazine: Newstand Nukes -- DOE Secretary Hazel O'Leary gave away the W-87 diagram to U.S. News and World Report; Classified design of nuclear warhead made availble to every foreign intelligence agency (8/3/99) http://web.archive.org/web/20000128233512/www.house.gov/curtweldon/oped_082399.htm
Have you read it?
Trust me, when they all talk, people listen to every word. And most of it has been discussed for months before it evr gets to Rummy.
The problem is China thinks the same thing about us- a bunch of uncivilized ignorant people who are mostly obsessed with sex, money, drugs, and power, which isn't true of course... Seriously, China is a massive threat precisely because it is a major civilization. It is also the only remaining Communist state that has the possibility of becoming a super-power, and is perhaps the only other state period that could, in the not so distant future, challenge America for world hegemony. China also has a strong undercurrent of xenophobia- they regard Han civilization as superior, and that would be true even without Communism.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.