Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biology expert testifies. Professor: Intelligent design is creationism.
York Dispatch ^ | 9/27/05 | Christina Kauffman

Posted on 09/27/2005 9:10:31 AM PDT by Crackingham

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 701-704 next last
To: Dr. Hog

The fossil record shows that kinds appear over time, they were not present from the beginning of life on earth. Furthermore new kinds look similar to existing kinds. Cows and horses don't suddenly appear in the cambrian for example. The first mammals are primitive kinds. Horses appear after horse-like kinds already exist. Even ID proponents accept the progression of life over time (the non-creationist ones). They just disagree over the mechanisms that caused this change.


81 posted on 09/27/2005 10:48:15 AM PDT by bobdsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Hog
Do plants and animals change? Yes. Have we ever observed them changing from one kind of animal to another or one plant to another? No.

So what is the barrier that stops change at some limit?

If ID promoters actually did real science, they'd instantly win Nobel prizes if they could describe the mechanism that did this and prove it's existence.

Without any such mechanism, there's no reason to think that small changes in species populations don't accumulate forever.

IDers don't do science, they only tear down science.

82 posted on 09/27/2005 10:48:19 AM PDT by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Hog
As to prehistoric evidence about species changeover through the fossil record, I would say the evidence is not very persuasive or we wouldn't be having this discussion.

There are >150 years of fossil evidence. Scientist argue about some of the fine points, but the overall pattern is becoming pretty clear.

The reason we are having this debate is that some people with specific religious beliefs are entering the fray. They generally know little about the actual fossils, but their belief leads them to try to denigrate the scientific process in order to cast doubt on the results.

83 posted on 09/27/2005 10:48:49 AM PDT by Coyoteman (Is this a good tagline?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

Comment #84 Removed by Moderator

To: tamalejoe
"Sexual reproduction is more complicated than anything happening in the Ferrari engine. In fact the simplest one celled animal is more complicated than the Ferrari engine. "

Quite true. That one fact just goes to show that human designers, which is what ID is based on, cannot consider all possibilities in their designs consequently they miss advantages. Evolution on the other hand is built just as our human knowledge is, new knowledge is based on a foundation of prior knowledge, with a few random ideas thrown in. After humans have been designing things for as long as evolution has, I'm sure we'll be able to handle more complicated designs. Unfortunately for ID, our inability to see all possibilities means we can not currently determine what could be designed unless it happens to resemble human designs. No guarantee that aliens would design like we do or would not emulate nature in their designs.

"If a Ferrari engine couldn't just happen, how in hell are those kinds of things supposed to?"

Do what engineers do [evolution], break large jobs up into many small easily handled jobs [cells], start with the smallest jobs possible [bacteria/virii/prions], use trial and error to determine the best fit [mutation and selection], base new designs on modified old designs [common descent], and take a very long time [3.8 billion years].

85 posted on 09/27/2005 10:49:00 AM PDT by b_sharp (Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
Biology expert testifies. Professor: Intelligent design is creationism.

Another one for my "they've got to be kidding me!" file.

This is what gives academics a bad name.The latter part of this headline is clearly and unambiguously an opinion, not a fact; and just as clearly beyond the ken of a "biology expert".

86 posted on 09/27/2005 10:50:30 AM PDT by Publius6961 (Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
Except that it is naturally occurring.
87 posted on 09/27/2005 10:51:18 AM PDT by Dr. Hog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: metmom
My complaint and argument is with those evolutionists who seem unable to accept the fact that not all creationists believe in the young Earth. They accuse creationists as a whole of distorting science because of the young Earth theory.

Do you have an actual example of this happening. (ie someone on the science side of the debate conflating YEC with creationism in general) I ask because the person whose post you originally complained about, who equated creationism with YEC per se, is himself a creationist.

88 posted on 09/27/2005 10:52:33 AM PDT by Thatcherite (Conservative and Biblical Literalist are not synonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Hog
2) The Theory of Evolution presupposes life was created by natural forces.

And don't you believe that God controls "natural forces"?

Saying that species evolved by "natural forces" and saying that "God created species" in my mind is saying the same thing.

89 posted on 09/27/2005 10:52:41 AM PDT by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

People always get angry at me when I suggest this exact same possibility. Atheists don't like it and neither do Christians in general. It is a lonely position to take.


90 posted on 09/27/2005 10:53:14 AM PDT by Codeflier (Implement Loser Pays)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Junior

LOL!
Some people have both obsessions and way too much free time!


91 posted on 09/27/2005 10:53:55 AM PDT by Publius6961 (Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76
And as for the "rape and pillage" part...what other philosophical conclusions would one draw from such a warped worldview?

I hope that I don't live near you. Apparently you believe that the only thing stopping you from raping and pillaging is your religious belief and the attendant rejection of evolution. Please let us all know if you ever get a crisis of faith.

92 posted on 09/27/2005 10:55:07 AM PDT by Thatcherite (Conservative and Biblical Literalist are not synonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: sr4402
The Evolutionist believes that there is no life after death and therefore can rape and pillage as his inclination desires.

I'm an evolutionist and I don't believe that.

The believer, on the other hand, through the scripture, knows the result of this and is compelled to live virtuously since death will be done away with.

Hitler was a believer who used scripture to justify his murder and mayhem. How do you explain that?

Which do you choose?

I'll choose truth, thank you.
.
93 posted on 09/27/2005 10:55:33 AM PDT by radioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook
"So how did the Universe and all its predictability evolve? Inquiring minds want to know that first."

Check into Cosmology and Quantum physics for that one.

94 posted on 09/27/2005 10:55:51 AM PDT by b_sharp (Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76
The Evolutionist believes that there is no life after death...

Not necessarily. Many Evolutionists/Darwinists believe exactly that.

Ah, creative editing to change the meaning of one's opponent's words. Lovely.

95 posted on 09/27/2005 10:56:17 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
The latter part of this headline is clearly and unambiguously an opinion

Really?

Didn't the "Intelligent Designer" create life? ID is another way of stating that we were created, and is therefore "creationism", whether or not it includes specific references to the Bible and Genesis.

96 posted on 09/27/2005 10:56:37 AM PDT by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76
And as for the "rape and pillage" part...what other philosophical conclusions would one draw from such a warped worldview?

Why would I want to do any such thing?
97 posted on 09/27/2005 10:56:59 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

Or access to some fairly decent database and web design software.


98 posted on 09/27/2005 10:57:49 AM PDT by Junior (Some drink to silence the voices in their heads. I drink to understand them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Thatcherite
I hope that I don't live near you. Apparently you believe that the only thing stopping you from raping and pillaging is your religious belief and the attendant rejection of evolution. Please let us all know if you ever get a crisis of faith.

Actually he can kill you, rape your daughter and slay your infant son. All he needs to hear is the magic word 'Midianite' and he's off to the races.

99 posted on 09/27/2005 10:58:09 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
Miller, whose resume is several pages long and includes a stint as a professor at Harvard University

Stopped reading about there.

If youre smart enough to get into Harvard, you should be smart enough to stay out.

100 posted on 09/27/2005 10:58:23 AM PDT by Windsong (FighterPilot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 701-704 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson