Skip to comments.
Webhosts for Conservative Sites, and Webhosting Experiences of Conservatives
September 24, 2005
| BIRDS
Posted on 09/24/2005 5:52:24 PM PDT by BIRDS
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
1
posted on
09/24/2005 5:52:25 PM PDT
by
BIRDS
To: BIRDS
I haven't heard anything about any of the major webhosts banning/refusing to take conservatives money. As long as your content is legal and not adult in nature all the big colos/webhosts will take you.
To: BIRDS
As conservatives, what are your experiences with webhosts? Stay away from TRIPOD at any price.
3
posted on
09/24/2005 5:58:01 PM PDT
by
martin_fierro
(|\/|4R71|\|_PH13RR0)
To: martin_fierro
Oh gawd....Angelfire...oh gawd...
4
posted on
09/24/2005 5:58:55 PM PDT
by
Dallas59
(“You love life, while we love death.” - Al-Qaeda / Democratic Party)
To: BIRDS
The biggest concern for a web host is getting paid. The politics of a web site really don't matter, short of obvious taboos.
5
posted on
09/24/2005 6:00:10 PM PDT
by
Mark was here
(How can they be called "Homeless" if their home is a field?.)
To: BIRDS
What webhosts have you had trouble with?
To: BIRDS
much of the internet is populated by liberal-to-extremely-leftwing individuals and their webhosting and service enterprises I haven't found that to be the case at all. Actually the Internet is a great gift for democracy, where many diverse ideas can be opined and debated at length. You just have to choose your websites, thats all. In no way is it dominated by views from the left nor right nor horizontal nor vertical nor 45 degree angle nor ..... nuff said.
To: SolarisRocks
Not so. PayPal, Google and AOL that I know of will severely restrict access on Second Amendment matters. You may quibble as you will.
8
posted on
09/24/2005 6:07:04 PM PDT
by
dhuffman@awod.com
(The conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense.)
To: dhuffman@awod.com
Paypal = money transfer/credit card processing service.
Google = Search engine/bunch of other things
AOL = ISP/content provider.
NONE of the above are webhosts which is they question at hand.
To: BIRDS
The political disposition of clientele shouldn't matter to a professional service provider. A business where such parameters would factor should be avoided, IMHO. Unless of course the price is just right. :-)
To: dhuffman@awod.com
Not so. PayPal, Google and AOL that I know of will severely restrict access on Second Amendment matters. You may quibble as you will. As good as Google is, and it is very good, I have stopped using it for all but the most complex searches. I refuse to put more money in the pockets of the two left wing billionaires who run it. The same two who refused to acknowledge 9/11 on their web site.
11
posted on
09/24/2005 6:14:14 PM PDT
by
Larry381
(This tagline closed for repairs until 2006)
To: BIRDS
Anyway, I recommend checking out Verio webhosting. This site is co-located with Verio
[1] and I've had nothing but a positively remarkable experience. Though I am coming from UUNET/WorldCom, where a root canal would be a positive experience, but I digress.
[1] Co-location isn't the same as webhosting, and in fact, are two separate divisions within Verio. But I figure the professionalism and courtesy I've experienced in the one would probably apply to the other as well.
To: dhuffman@awod.com
He was asking about web hosts.
None of those are web hosting companies, although AOL may provide 'personal' web pages. Not sure, but they're not a web hosting company, which is the topic of this thread.
13
posted on
09/24/2005 6:33:29 PM PDT
by
flashbunny
(Do you believe in the Constitution only until it keeps the government from doing what you want?)
To: BIRDS
All I can say - I have 20+ web sites hosted with:
http://www.forwardweb.com
for several years now - only rare problems, but ForwardWeb jumps on them and fixes everything quickly.
Not mine !
To: Larry381
Well google just left my machine.
15
posted on
09/24/2005 6:35:11 PM PDT
by
lrb111
To: lrb111
Microsoft is liberal and so is Apple. Are you going to stop using one/both of them?
To: martin_fierro
17
posted on
09/24/2005 6:44:31 PM PDT
by
MaineVoter2002
(http://jednet207.tripod.com/PoliticalLinks.html)
To: MaineVoter2002
Tripod doesn't support a lot of the more current/dynamic methods used to generate webpages.
To: SolarisRocks
Good question. Maybe we should just boycott Newsmax, Fox Websites, Rush Limbaugh...heck...LET'S JUST GIVE THE LIBS TOTAL CONTROL OF THE INTERNET
19
posted on
09/24/2005 6:46:27 PM PDT
by
MaineVoter2002
(http://jednet207.tripod.com/PoliticalLinks.html)
To: BIRDS
Dude, your second sentence is 77 words long. Stop and take a breath once in a while.
20
posted on
09/24/2005 6:51:38 PM PDT
by
No Longer Free State
(No event has just one cause, no person has just one motive, no action has just the intended effect.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson