Skip to comments.
VANITY - Rebuild New Orleans as the City of Tomorrow!
Self
Posted on 09/21/2005 6:11:09 AM PDT by Puddleglum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 last
To: rjp2005
That's not a bad idea. But the first priority is cleaning up and housing people, most of whom have nothing right now. That's very true, and lots of good people are helping to do just that -- outside of NO. But the question remains: if the gov and private sector are going to rebuild the city, ought it simply be returned status quo? If not, why not try some innovations?
61
posted on
09/21/2005 8:07:31 AM PDT
by
Puddleglum
(Thank God the Boston blowhard lost)
To: Constitution Day
As much as I'd like one, can you imagine the chaos if the terrible drivers that are currently earthbound got turned loose in the wild blue yonder? Testify.
A lot of people have a hard enough time navigating in TWO dimensions, let alone THREE.
62
posted on
09/21/2005 9:03:39 AM PDT
by
martin_fierro
(Back from vay-kay)
To: martin_fierro
The FAA would have a hell of a budget!
How was your vacation?
To: Puddleglum
Well, if the roof of your house is missing, you dont spend your money upgrading the kitchen.
If anything, a "city of yesterday" (more agricultural land) would be more appropriate, and Katrina already has taken care of starting that. Areas will be abandoned and perhaps farmers (high-tech or not) will take advantage of the dirt cheap land.
I like your idea but perhaps it combines both elements yesterday and today. In other words, a much smaller city area, more elevated and protected, and a much larger plowed over farmland/floodable zone encouraging kelp farms or those things you suggested.
64
posted on
09/21/2005 10:13:04 AM PDT
by
rjp2005
To: TheBattman
Yep - inches per year. Does that matter?
65
posted on
09/21/2005 7:33:47 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
(When incentives are switched, patterns change. Until then, it's same old, same old.)
To: GOPJ
The "Crescent" isn't sinking. Apparantly there's a rocky outcrop down there that keeps it suspended above sea-level. However, the Mississippi River has accumulated enough silt in its bed that it has risen higher than the Crescent ~ hence, the need for massive levees along the river.
Everything else down there is sinking.
66
posted on
09/21/2005 8:15:07 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
(/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again?)
To: muawiyah
The "Crescent" isn't sinking. Apparantly there's a rocky outcrop down there that keeps it suspended above sea-level. However, the Mississippi River has accumulated enough silt in its bed that it has risen higher than the Crescent ~ hence, the need for massive levees along the river. Thanks -- interesting.
67
posted on
09/21/2005 8:25:31 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
(When incentives are switched, patterns change. Until then, it's same old, same old.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson